HUMN 330 Week 3 Discussion
Module 3 – Topic of Choice Research Presentation: Topic Submission
Information about the Topic of Choice Research Presentation assignment was introduced in the last module. You were also provided with a list of topic suggestions as a guide to assist you in selecting a topic. Your topic is due by the last day of this module. Note: You may also request a relevant topic that is not on the list as long as it relates to values and ethics and can address the assignment requirements. In this discussion activity, submit your proposed topic for approval. Be specific in describing how you will address the issue.
Duplicate topics may not be approved so be sure to check this discussion to view the topics already selected by classmates. The earlier you post your topic, the greater the chance of it being approved.
Your topic must be approved by your instructor. Your instructor will respond with approval of your topic or suggestions for modifications. Once the topic is approved begin researching your topic and prepare accordingly for the submission of the presentation in Module 6. The class will conduct an open discussion of all issues in Module 7. Review the Information About the Topic of Choice Research Presentation for assignment details and a list of topic suggestions.
https://erau.instructure.com/courses/96266/files/18338541/download?wrap=1
HUMN 330 Week 4 Discussion 2
HUMN 330 Week 3 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle
Module 3 – Topic of Choice Research Presentation: Topic Submission
Information about the Topic of Choice Research Presentation assignment was introduced in the last module. You were also provided with a list of topic suggestions as a guide to assist you in selecting a topic. Your topic is due by the last day of this module. Note: You may also request a relevant topic that is not on the list as long as it relates to values and ethics and can address the assignment requirements. In this discussion activity, submit your proposed topic for approval. Be specific in describing how you will address the issue.
Duplicate topics may not be approved so be sure to check this discussion to view the topics already selected by classmates. The earlier you post your topic, the greater the chance of it being approved.
Your topic must be approved by your instructor. Your instructor will respond with approval of your topic or suggestions for modifications. Once the topic is approved begin researching your topic and prepare accordingly for the submission of the presentation in Module 6. The class will conduct an open discussion of all issues in Module 7. Review the Information About the Topic of Choice Research Presentation for assignment details and a list of topic suggestions.
https://erau.instructure.com/courses/96266/files/18338541/download?wrap=1
HUMN 330 Week 4 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help
HUMN 330 Week 4 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle
Module 4 – Discussion 2: Wealth and Poverty in America
Various areas across America represent all points on the spectrum between rich and poor, poverty and privilege. View one or more of the following videos related to poverty or wealth in America.
- Poverty in America Documentary 2017 (52:01)
- America’s Poor Kids (Child Poverty Documentary – Real Stories (58:51)
- 740 Park Avenue Wealth and Power (54:30)
- The rise of the Super Rich Untold Wealth of the One Percent (45:03)
After you watching the videos, post a thoughtful critique addressing the following questions:
- What were the main points of the documentary? What moral/ethical issues were addressed?
- What was your reaction to the issues? Did any aspect surprise you?
- Why do you think there is such a large gap between the richest and the poorest in our society?
- Were the issues presented in a biased or unbiased manner? Were the arguments grounded in fact or opinion? Did the presenters/producers appear to have an underlying agenda that they were pushing forward?
- What is a moral/ethical response to the identified issues? Should we intervene to “fix” the problems identified? Why or why not?
Read your peers’ posts and comment in a respectful manner to at least one classmates that you agree with and one that you disagree with. Be specific in your responses to their positions. Review the discussion guidelines and the evaluation rubric to ensure your submission meets the standard.