Post an explanation of how competing needs, such as the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients, may impact the development of policy. Then, describe any specific competing needs that may impact the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.

Post an explanation of how competing needs, such as the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients, may impact the development of policy. Then, describe any specific competing needs that may impact the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected. What are the impacts, and how might policy address these competing needs? Be specific and provide examples.


How Competing Needs Impact Policy Development

     The ability to provide widespread access to health services while raising the quality of care and managing costs is a critical problem for healthcare systems worldwide. Most medical professionals are adamant about providing high-quality care (Kelly & Porr, 2018). Various factors influence the demand for of registered nurses. The detrimental effects of the current nursing practice environment on the field’s ability to attract new students and the retention of registered nurses are particularly concerning. Companies are having to adjust the policies more often than before in order to keep current nurses and try to attract new ones. These policies are made by management teams within the company in response to the needs that are verbalized by the nursing staff.

Competing Needs that impact the Nursing Shortage

     According to research in Milliken’s paper, nurses frequently feel unprepared to handle the ethical dilemmas they encounter in practice, which may lead to moral anguish and burnout. One strategy to address this issue is to guarantee that nurses have the resources necessary to handle challenging circumstances (Milliken, 2018). In order to solve issues and meet patient requirements, nurses must first be aware of any potential ethical consequences of their activities. The healthcare sector places many pressures on healthcare providers, including the difficulties of clinical work, time restraints, competing demands, a lack of control over work procedures and scheduling, and contradictory leadership responsibilities and connections (Bridgeman et al., 2018). Healthcare leaders must recognize when their staff is burning out or need additional help. Participating in policymaking by healthcare workers is nothing new. However, only some get involved due to high-stress levels and poor work-life and personal-life balance. It is vital, however, that nurses speak up and ensure that policymakers within their company hear the issues. This would be a significant factor in developing policies that would benefit nurses and all healthcare workers, leading to decreased burnout.

How can Policies Impact Competing Needs

     The issues nurses experience are misrepresented by the widespread belief that COVID-19 is to blame for their burnout and job loss. More correctly, the epidemic has brought attention to and magnified nurses’ long-standing professional difficulties. According to scientific consensus, understaffing, unfavorable workplace conditions, and the absence of solid ethical frameworks are the leading causes of nurse burnout and moral distress. Burnout and moral distress can contribute to one another’s development, although their underlying causes and effects differ. There is a consensus that burnout and moral anguish were problems caused by unfavorable working conditions long before the pandemic began (Schlak et al., 2022). Influence is the power to compel changes in beliefs, behaviors, and outcomes. One of the most significant and rewarding traits of leadership is having influence. All leaders must exercise caution when using this gift (Broome & Marshall, 2021, p. 334). Healthcare professionals must speak out about workplace issues and other challenges in order to make a positive impact on healthcare. Our legislators may create regulations that reduce nurse burnout and boost nursing retention if they actively listen to the requirements of healthcare employees. Our current employers must be made aware of these as well. Healthcare professionals have the power to improve the nation’s healthcare system. All they have to do is raise their voices.


Competing Needs Impact Policy Development

Policy development often comes with many competing needs of the organization, patient needs, financial needs, staff needs, and ethical considerations, to name a few. Nurses are often caught in the crosshairs of implementing a policy while knowing it does not align with the best needs of each patient. One persistent theme with nursing care versus policy is that the business models often need to pay more attention to the needs of the patient and nursing judgment and education in seeking the best outcomes for the organization rather than the patient (Kelly & Porr, 2018). This can lead to conflict in care teams, personal or professional, and stimulate a decline in patient care or organizational growth.

Competing Need’s Impact on Mental Health Resources

Currently, 150 million people live in an area federally designated as having a mental health provider shortage (Weiner, 2022). Several issues impact the provider shortage seen in mental health. There need to be more residency positions available to train new psychiatrists, and business models are driving patient care to be less patient-centered and more business-centered. Rural communities face challenges in recruiting providers. Additionally, nursing burnout and turnover can be high in mental health, even before COVID-19. A factor in nursing burnout is that nurses often feel unprepared to mitigate the ethical issues they face in their day-to-day practice (Milliken, 2018).

Policy’s Impact on Competing Needs

Policies can have a significant effect on patient needs. Considering mental health populations, policies must be reviewed for ethical considerations, ensuring the policy is not infringing on patients’ rights. This population can be challenging to treat, often non-compliance with treatment regimens for a variety of reasons- homelessness, lack of financial ability to afford services, lack of understanding whether that is baseline cognitive function or impacted by current disease state, physical access to services, or simply no longer taking medications because they were feeling better. This population requires much follow-up to help reach their care goals. They may also need other services that the policies fail to acknowledge. An example comes from the unit I currently work in. It is a crisis observation unit that keeps patients in a safe setting while awaiting inpatient placement. The policies did not account for the need for a social worker. So currently, we share a social worker with several of the medical floors, which means we rarely, if ever, see a social worker. It was not accounted for. It is something highly needed to be added to our policy, and now we are changing the policy to include the social workers in unit operations.


Competing Needs and Policy Development

Policy development can be a tricky feat. There are usually many stakeholders and communities that are affected by new policies and it is important to understand everyone’s needs to ensure allotted resources are divided fairly and accordingly. Many things come into play such as, Patients, providers, insurance companies, healthcare administrators and politicians (Stone, 2022, p. 20). The needs that are competing in relation to the lack of access to healthcare are the need for healthcare infrastructure and the need for quality healthcare.

Without adequate infrastructure available for behavioral health patients emergency rooms are inundated with patients who are holding for treatment facility beds and taking up valuable resources in the emergency departments for medical complaints and emergencies. Nursing staff is becoming overwhelmed with the patient loads and new facilities or processes need to be developed for nurses to prevent burnout. Without nurses speaking up for themselves and lobbying for change, administrators will continue to push their staff for monetary profits compromising patient outcomes (Kelly & Porr, 2018). Policy can address these needs by allocating funds for psychiatric facilities and behavioral health staff. New facilities need to be constructed to support the demand in certain communities. Behavioral Health urgent cares or holdings can be developed to relieve the patient load from emergency rooms resources as well as inpatient facilities being able to apply for grants to expand existing facilities to accommodate increasing demands (Atkinson et al., 2020. p. 5-6).


Nurses constantly face the challenge of providing a high standard of nursing care to patients even though their resources can be minimal at times, which leaves them feeling frustrated and without any voice as their patient’s advocate (Kelly & Porr, 2018). A national healthcare stressor for many healthcare systems is nursing shortages and burnout. These two usually go hand in hand because the shortages of nurses create more of a workload for the nurses, which then leads to burnout.

Due to the aging population, the need for healthcare services has increased. The shortage of nurses can lead to high morbidity and mortality rates as well as errors (Haddad, et al., 2022). There has been an increase in registered nurses and advanced practice nurses over the years due to the aging population and need for healthcare however, due to the increase in demand for healthcare, this can cause turnover and burnout in the healthcare providers (Broome & Marshall, 2021). The shortages we face can hinder the development of policies aimed at creating a better working environment for nurses. If the healthcare systems do not have the appropriate resources, they require for development of policies these get set aside until the need is met. How can a healthcare system put a policy into place if it doesn’t have the workforce to carry it out?

Nursing burnout and shortages are an issue across all healthcare systems today. The healthcare systems are trying to develop strategies to combat the shortages and avoid burnout in their nursing staff. The needs to combat this national healthcare issue include the need for increased workforce and resources. Healthcare systems have already begun putting recruitment efforts in place such as the use of travel/agency nurses, sign-on bonuses, and other incentives to attract more nurses to their facilities. There is also the competing need of practice authority varying from state to state. This creates roadblocks for advanced practice RNs in some states that have restrictions (Broome & Marshall, 2021). Some professional organizations support the idea of mandating a DNP for all advanced practice RNs by the year 2025 which can create more of a problem with the shortage issue solely based on the time it takes to obtain a DNP degree (Broome & Marshall, 2021). I am not so sure that policy will address these issues in a positive way unless it moves away from this requirement. If more states were to get rid of the collaborative agreement for advanced practice nurses, this type of policy change could help the shortages of providers in some states.

When it comes to registered nurse staff in healthcare systems and the shortages they face, policy changes such as the education and experience requirements that some facilities require could assist in the hiring of nurses to help the shortages they are experiencing. Some healthcare systems require you to have so many years of experience in a certain specialty in order to work there. For example, some emergency departments or labor and delivery units require nurses to have at least one year of experience in that specialty in order to be hired. If policy could change in the way of hiring more graduate nurses and training them to the specialty, it could help the shortage. Either way, there needs to be some wiggle room with these healthcare systems so this national healthcare stressor can be managed better. The nurses that are left dealing with this firsthand are getting burned out and exhausted while working short staffed.


Needs of the workforce, resources, and patients makes an impact on the development of policies. Policies are created by upper management who are responsible for keeping up to keep with changes and activities related to policy. Nursing leaders should be aware of health policy so that they can provide input to nursing management and help with the changes that would affect reforms in health care policy (Broome and Marshall, 2021).

Changes in workforce and patient load lead to changing policies with staff to patient ratio. When I first started nursing night shift nurses only could take 4 patients at night on the cardiac floor and now that policy has changed to nurses taking 6 patients per nurse. Resource policy changes as well when supply is low for certain resources such as cleaning supplies for the floor. Different products are used, or different cleaning methods are created to help with the problem.

COVID-19 lead to many changes in policy that were related to staffing and resources. Bedside nurses experienced them the most and policies were changing daily. A Korean study focused on health care policy reform due to its population being older and changes with COVID-19 changed their whole health care system due to COVID-19 affecting the older population more. They didn’t have enough nurses for the increase in patients they were experiencing and in Korean healthcare families play a big part in caring for their loved ones in the hospital. Having more family involvement lead to increased exposure in hospitals. Bedside nurses became involved politically and lead health care policy reform through civic organizations to help resolve visiting and staffing policies during COVID-19 (NamKyung, 2020).

Resource policy changed with COVID-19 due to there not being enough resources such as PPE for staff. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention allowed an autoclave sterilization process to be used for N95s due to the reasoning of there being a crisis capacity level. This process used a 70% ethanol treatment, and it was determined that this process did comprise the filters breathability (Grinshpun et al., 2020). Methods like this were used even with limited data because it was safer than nothing at all for frontline workers.


Healthcare is a vital field that provides citizens with healthcare and medical services. Despite its vital role, healthcare is rather a stressful working environment, and proper management of healthcare facilities is a difficult task to do. The medical staff consists of various personnel, and nurses are the most underestimated part of medical facilities. Additional ethical dilemmas for nurses during their duties are rather stressful and harm their efficiency.

In the modern healthcare system, the nursing staff plays an important role by assisting patients and monitoring their health conditions. Also, nurses act as a link between medical doctors, patients, and their families. In the modern American healthcare sector, nursing staff interacts with patients even more than professional doctorate staff. In the contemporary situation, nurses are not secondary, but additional and important medical staff. According to Milliken (2018), nurses are exposed to various ethical dilemmas that affect their overall efficiency and harm healthcare services. The key ethical issues are patient autonomy, confidentiality, allocation of resources, and enormous workload. Milliken (2018) found that current educational frameworks for nursing staff ignore ethical threats, and during real-life duties, most nurses feel unprepared to manage ethical challenges. The enormous workload is a serious problem because it has a national scale, and in the long-term run leads to professional burn-out and retirement from the profession (Kelly and Porr, 2018). Healthcare managers should do their best to avoid overload and additional work shifts for nursing staff. Undoubtedly, all medical staff understands the unstable nature of this profession and the necessity of extra shifts during emergencies, but human beings are not robots and overload leads to a lack of efficiency and mistakes.

The enormous workload of medical personnel is a very dangerous issue that leads to professional burnout, retirement from the profession, and further shortages in the medical labor market. Healthcare managers should use all their skills to avoid extra shifts that reduce overall efficiency and lead to mistakes. In the healthcare sector, mistakes could be fatal and healthcare managers should eliminate all possible risks.


Organizational Policies

The healthcare issue I chose to focus on was nurse practitioner autonomy.  While many states have adopted independent practice for mid-level providers such as PAs and NPs, others require a practice agreement with a physician.  These practice agreements usually cost money and must be renewed in a specific time frame.  The NPs must follow their state license guidelines for procedures and prescribing authority. However, ethical conflicts in the workplace are commonplace in the nursing profession due to conflicting organizational logistics and policies and quality of care (Kelly & Porr, 2018). These ethical conflicts can spread to NPs when they know they can ethically improve access to healthcare and decreases costs if they were allowed to practice independently nationwide which would allow organizations to adopt different organizational policies.

Competing or Common goals

While organizational policies might require a physician agreement, changing laws nationwide would greatly impact the costs and provider burnout in individual institutions.  For example, without the physician agreement requirement, NPs would be able to practice more independently greatly reducing the strain on the healthcare staff in the organization. Likewise, nurse practitioner labor is cheaper than physician labor which would decrease healthcare costs.  This should be seen as a common goal that by allowing NPs to practice independently, healthcare costs would be reduced.  If an organization does not provide the resources to provide quality care to save money, this can lead to ethical conflicts amongst the healthcare staff (Kelly & Porr, 2018).  However, by ensuring that NPs can practice independently, it would save healthcare institutions money and improve access to quality healthcare overall.

Conclusion

            Providing the best quality care possible should be the goal of every organization that has a healthcare function.  Occasionally what is ethical sometimes conflicts with organizational needs. However, ethics is at the center of everything that nurses do (Milliken, 2018). Removing practice agreements for NPs nationwide will allow greater access for patients to access quality healthcare, would help reduce healthcare costs due to various reasons, and therefore would allow for more ethical healthcare solutions.  Specifically, APRNs are poised to address social determinants of health and provide opportunities for underserved populations to access healthcare (Heath, 2022).


Competing needs that impact policy development

            In healthcare, we must have policies to help guide nurses in their specific roles, rules, and regulations of their practice and fulfill a knowledge base for the everyday care of their patients (Annesley, 2019). Policies must be realistic and obtainable, or they will never survive the healthcare environment. When developing a policy, one must consider how it could affect the healthcare workers, patients, and resources, such as the healthcare entity being about to afford the necessities to coincide with the policy.

Nurses work daily with patients at the bedside and should be involved in policy development. They know their working environments and what resources are needed to do their job effectively and can usually anticipate patients’ needs. Part of nursing is knowing the needs of patients with various socioeconomic classes in different environments, being conscientious of ethics and what is right for patients and staff members, and providing the best care for patients (Walden University, LLC, 2012).

Competing needs that impact the nursing shortage and quality of care

            Nurses can agree that nursing shortages affect the quality of care that is provided to patients. They also can usually notice that if there were more resources for staffing, for example, it could lead to a better quality of care (Suhaimi et al., 2021). Resources, such as money, obviously play a large role in nurse staffing because they must be able to pay their staff and add more positions to care for the patient numbers they are serving. There must be an incentive to attract new nurses to the entity to fill open positions, and companies must be prepared for this. Money also plays a factor in caring for the patients and having the resources needed, such as equipment and medical supplies. Lastly, patients impact the nursing need because if a facility has been low census for some time, they will not keep the same number of nurses on duty at one time and may even let some of their staff go if they are no longer needed. There must be an anticipation of what the current patient population might need; for instance, if there are more needy, heavier care patients, the entity must be able to fulfill the needs of this by providing enough care to provide for those patients.

Impacts and how they are addressed

            The impacts of the nursing shortages are causing more stress on the current nurses, causing them to want to leave the profession, creating unsafe working environments, increased errors, and patient care quality problems. Many states have investigated ways to keep and recruit more nurses, lessening requirements for licenses, modifying laws relating to the nursing scope, and paying it forward to healthcare workers through incentives (Enlund, 2022).

The government also recognizes that the quality of care of patients is of utmost importance, and the way to do that is to provide better quality that will reduce errors.  The plan should also include the recruitment and retention of nurses in healthcare entities. The standard set for nurses is that they should only have one patient in a trauma situation in places such as an ER, one patient in surgery, up to two patients in units such as L & D, tele, peds, etc., up to three patients in units such as the ER, four patients in units such as psychiatry and med surg, for example, up to five patients in SNF units, and up to six patients in units such as post-partum (Congress.gov, 2021). As nurses, we all know this is not the case, more often than not. Facilities continue to push nurses to their max performance and expect the top-notch quality to be given to patients simultaneously. Where is the tipping point where these laws or followed by facilities, or else they are fined or held liable for not abiding by them?


According to the American Nurses Association’s Code of Ethics for Nurses (2015), “The workplace must be a morally good environment to ensure ongoing safe, quality patient care and professional satisfaction for nurses and to minimize and address moral distress, strain, and dissonance” (Provision 6, p. 25). The national healthcare issue of medical, clinical, and auxiliary staff shortages in nursing homes and long-term care facilities undermines a healthy moral environment, safe practice for nurses, and quality care for residents. Kelly and Porr (2018) noted that “RNs are constantly challenged to provide quality nursing care, while resources are chipped away,” which exacerbates “frustration, exasperation, and a sense of powerlessness to change their circumstances” (Para. 2). Thus, nursing shortages, deepened by the COVID-19 pandemic, constantly compete with other needs, such as restricted budget, patient dissatisfaction, staff burnout, scarce resources, etc., and directly impact policy development on state and federal levels. According to Enlund (2022, June 20), states endorsed a variety of legislations to alleviate the nursing shortage, including “loosening licensing requirements, changing scope of practice laws, bolstering educational programs, and offering monetary incentives” (State Action section). Most states enacted licensure compact legislature “to allow various types of health professionals to provide services to patients in other states” as virtual healthcare gained more popularity during the pandemic (State Action section). Additionally, states expanded the scope of practice (SOP) for nurse practitioners (NPs), “waiving some types of practice agreement requirements to allow increased access to providers” (State Action section). On the federal level, multiple competing needs and, consequently, inadequate nursing homes performance during the peak of the pandemic prompted a complete policy revision impacting nursing homes and long-term care facilities operations. Thus, on March 1, 2022, the Biden administration revealed a comprehensive nursing home reform to ensure sufficient staffing and funds for safe and undisrupted nursing home functions. According to Edelman (2022, March 3), the reform enables “improving nurse staffing levels and holding facilities and their corporate owners accountable for the billions of dollars they receive under the Medicare and Medicaid programs” (para. 1). The reform provisions pursue such goals as to “establish a minimum nursing home staffing requirement, reduce resident room crowding, strengthen SNF value-based purchasing, reinforce safeguards against unnecessary medications and treatments” and other quality enhancing goals (para. 6).

Additionally, competing needs of the workforce can directly impact the national healthcare issue of the nursing shortage. As facilities are short in staff and desperately seeking solutions to temporarily fill in the gap in the schedule, travel nurses became increasingly popular to provide short-term relief. According to Enlund (2022, June 20), travel nurses are “employed by an independent nursing staffing agency instead of a single hospital,” travel across the country, and “provide temporary, immediate assistance to a hospital or other facility seeking short-term nurse staffing solutions” (Travel Nurses 101 section). According to American Hospital Association (2023, February 16), “data from a forthcoming Syntellis Performance Solutions/AHA report will show that travel nurse full time equivalents (FTEs) per patient day rose over 183.4% from 2019 to 2022” (p. 3). As demand for travel nurses continues to grow, the salary of travel nurses is “three to four times that of a full-time employed nurse” (Enlund, 2022 June 20, Travel Nurses 101 section). As a result, competing needs of the workforce create an imbalance in salaries and further strain healthcare facilities’ resources by operating in the circumstances of staff shortages and paying overcharged staffing agencies’ services. The states attempt to compensate for the impact of workforce competing needs on unfair pricing by applying “price-gouging law,” which prevents an “unconscionable” increase in pricing during emergency and resource scarcity situations (Enlund, 2022 June 20, Travel Nurses 101 section). For example, Minnesota and Illinois imposed limitations on staffing agencies’ pricing with a 150% wage cap “of the median wage rate over the preceding three years” (Enlund, 2022 June 20, Travel Nurses 101 section).


Competing Needs Impacting Nurse Staffing Issues Nurse staffing issues are prevalent in the healthcare industry and significantly impact patient care outcomes. Two competing needs that impact nurse staffing issues are staffing shortages and financial constraints. Staffing shortages occur when nurses cannot meet patient care demands, leading to higher workloads, job dissatisfaction, and nurse burnout. Financial constraints refer to the limited resources that healthcare organizations have to allocate to nurse staffing, which may result in inadequate staffing levels, compromised patient care, and staff burnout (Costa & Friese, 2022).

The relevant policy in our organization that influences nurse staffing is the staffing ratio policy. The policy stipulates the minimum number of nurses required to attend to a specific number of patients. For instance, the policy may require a one-to-four nurse-patient ratio for intensive care units. The policy is intended to ensure patient safety, adequate staffing levels, and optimal patient outcomes.

The staffing ratio policy in our organization has ethical implications that require critical examination. First, the policy may be compromised if healthcare organizations prioritize profits over patient safety. If a healthcare organization understaffs, patients may be at risk of receiving suboptimal care, leading to adverse outcomes, which is against the ethical principle of patient-centered care. Secondly, the staffing ratio policy may infringe on nurses’ autonomy and professionalism, leading to job dissatisfaction, turnover, and burnout. Nurses may feel overworked and undervalued, leading to ethical dilemmas regarding their professional responsibilities ( Abhicharttibutra et al., 2017 ).

To balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients and promote ethics, the following policy or practice changes can be implemented: Increase the use of technology to support nurse staffing: Our organization can implement innovative care models, such as remote monitoring and mobile apps, that can increase nurse productivity and reduce the demand for in-person care. This approach can address the staffing shortage issue and reduce the workload on nurses, leading to improved job satisfaction, reduced burnout, and better patient outcomes.

Another practice our organization can do is to Implement a flexible staffing policy. A flexible staffing policy can allow nurses to work flexible schedules that accommodate their personal needs and preferences. This approach can reduce nurse burnout, increase job satisfaction, and improve nurse retention, leading to better patient care outcomes.

Evidence supports the effectiveness of technology and flexible staffing policies in addressing nurse staffing issues. A study by Li et al. (2021) found that remote monitoring technologies, such as telehealth and mobile apps, significantly improved patient care outcomes and reduced the workload on nurses. Another study by Yin et al. (2019) found that implementing flexible staffing policies increased nurse satisfaction and reduced job burnout, improving patient care outcomes.

Competing needs, such as staffing shortages and financial constraints, can significantly impact nurse staffing issues in healthcare organizations. To address these challenges, healthcare organizations can implement policies and practices that balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while promoting ethics. Technology and flexible staffing policies can improve nurse retention, job satisfaction, and patient care outcomes. It is essential to have evidence-based resources that support policy or practice recommendations to ensure optimal outcomes for patients, healthcare providers, and healthcare organizations.


Competing needs refer to the various demands and pressures that healthcare organizations face, including those of patients, healthcare providers, and available resources. These competing needs can significantly impact the development of policies designed to address nurse staffing issues. For example, healthcare organizations may need to balance the need for adequate staffing levels to ensure quality, effective, and safe patient care while managing limited resources and financial constraints( Goldfarb et al., 2008 ).
Specific competing needs impacting nurse staffing issues may include staffing shortages, patient demand, and limited resources, including staffing and staff training funding ( Costa & Friese, 2022 ). For instance, nurse staffing ratios may be impacted by the need to manage patient demand for care, limited staff training and development resources, and staffing shortages due to increased patient acuity and nurse burnout.
Policies can address competing needs in nurse staffing by balancing the various demands and pressures of healthcare organizations, patients, and healthcare providers. Effective policies must consider the various stakeholders’ needs and prioritize their needs to ensure patient safety and optimal health outcomes ( Abhicharttibutra et al., 2017 ). For example, policies may include a balance of staffing ratios to manage patient care demands while maintaining safe staffing levels, providing incentives for staff training and development, and addressing nurse burnout through flexible scheduling and wellness programs.
In addition, policies could address the nurse shortage issue by promoting technology and innovative care models that can increase efficiency and reduce the demand for nursing staff. For example, mobile apps and remote monitoring technologies can help reduce the need for in-person care and increase the productivity of nurses.
In conclusion, competing needs are inherent in healthcare delivery and can significantly impact the development of policies designed to address nurse staffing issues. Effective policies must balance competing needs, prioritize patient safety and health outcomes, and consider the various stakeholders’ needs, including patients, healthcare providers, and available resources. Adequate nurse staffing is critical for ensuring quality, effective, and safe patient care, and policies must address competing needs to achieve optimal outcomes.


Competing Needs Impacts on the Development of Policy

The development of policy is very complex. One must address an issue’s economic, social, and political variables. However, there are competing needs that can impact policy development. These needs include workforce, finances, competitors, or limited resources. These competing demands impact policy development by limiting or altering the resources required to develop the policy. However, these competing needs can positively impact the development of policy by forcing one to address these competing needs and form a stronger approach that will deliver more significant outcomes (Broome & Marshall, 2021; Kelly & Porr, 2018).

Competing Needs Impacts on Nursing Shortage Policy

The nursing shortages affect direct patient care, funding, and reimbursements to healthcare organizations and the general healthcare environment in America. Many competing needs impact the nursing shortage policy development. One competing need would be the nursing workload specifically related to nurse-to-patient ratios. Many states do not have mandatory regulations to limit high nurse-to-patient ratios, leading to high nurse-to-patient ratios and increasing nurse burnout. Nurse burnout leads to other competing needs of the workforce. With nurse burnout, one has nurses leaving the profession. This impacts the development of policy for the nursing shortage by limiting the available workforce. Finally, finances are a competing need that impacts policy development for the nursing shortage. Healthcare organizations must address the nursing shortage issue while improving patient care quality and minimizing or improving financial costs. Depending on the healthcare organization’s funding and reimbursements, along with their current financial status, this could hinder what the organization could offer finically for the policy (Broome & Marshall, 2021; Buerhaus, 2021; Jones & Spiva, 2023; Pittman & Scully-Russ, 2016).

Addressing Competing Needs

One may address the competing needs with the nursing shortage policy development by first setting mandatory regulations for safe nurse-to-patient ratios. This would help improve nursing workloads and decrease nursing burnout. Also, safe nurse-to-patient ratios can improve patient care by decreasing medication errors and infection rates associated with high nurse-to-patient ratios. Next, one must listen to the nurses who left the profession related to nurse burnout and make changes to bring the nurses back into the profession. This will not be a simple fix and will take altering America’s current healthcare as a whole. Finally, healthcare organizations must perform risk assessments to analyze what can be done financially to improve the nursing shortage. The development of the nursing shortage policy will be complex. However, it is vital for the healthcare system in America ( Buerhaus, 2021; Kelly & Porr, 2018; Jones & Spiva, 2023; Pittman & Scully-Russ, 2016).


Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues

            It is difficult now more than ever for hospitals to allocate resources, resources are becoming more costly and healthcare systems have budgets (Daniels, 2016). During the Covid-19 epidemic we faced a lot of shortages in supplies and resources and organizations had to allocate for that. I believe one of the deficient we have is a shortage of nurses. Due to this shortage, nurses are required to take on a larger workload and patient to nurse ratio. Policies must be development on limits to these ratios to ensure patient safety, the nurses well-being, and nurse retention. The purpose of this post is to discuss how competing needs and limited resources effect policies and how this effects high patient to nurse ratios.

           High patient to nurse ratios can decrease the survival rate for critically ill patients (Lee et al., 2017). When a nurse is assigned a workload with a high ratio, that gives the nurse less time to spend with each patient individually which can make it easy to miss errors or signs of impeding distress. Nurses carry many hats, and they need time to complete all of their tasks safely, to ensure a good patient outcome. Due to the current nursing shortage, organizations have to weigh their resources for care and one of these sacrifices is the patient to nurse ratio. But patient and nurse safety must be taken into consideration when determining how many patients a nurse can care for.

          Nurses are required to provide good quality care to their patients while working with limited resources (Kelly & Porr, 2018). Policies will address the competing needs by setting limits to patient to nurse ratios. While there are patients waiting to be cared for, this should not jeopardize the health of other patients due to unsafe workloads on nurses. There should be policies in place that put a limit on the number of patients a nurse can safely care for. There needs to be policies in place to no only increase patient safety and good outcomes, but also the safety and well-being of the nursing staff. Studies have shown that high workloads, low staffing rates, and long shifts can lead to nursing burnout (Dall’Ora et al., 2020).


Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues

Allocation of resources is something that nurse leaders can be involved in within the organization at which they work. Many resources are finite, and leaders need to weigh the pros and cons of when and where they are allocated. Nurse leaders have a responsibility to think of the greater good of all involved when making decisions like these. The purpose of this discussion assignment is to explain how competing needs impact the development of policy and then describe specific needs that impact the healthcare issue selected.

Competing Needs Impacting Policy

There are many different resources that organizations have that can be allocated to different needs. One need of the workforce is appropriate staffing. This is an important need as there are laws regarding nurse to patient ratios and when there are not enough nurses, patients may be turned away for care. Organizations do not wish to ever have to do this, so there are resources in place to ensure that appropriate staffing can be obtained. One resource is money. Extra funds may be in place in some organizations to be spent on travel or registry nurses. This being said, these extra funds can only go so far when used on a short-term or temporary fix such as using these nurses. Policies should be developed so that all of the allotted money is not used up on these quick fixes. Our book mentions that nurse leaders have the gift of influence and need to practice that quality cautiously (Broome & Marshall, 2021). Some organizations have policies in place to cap the wages of travel nurses. This creates a dilemma though, if wages are capped, will nurses be less inclined to sign travel contracts (Odom-Forren, 2022). The main issue is that these short-term contract nurses are making significantly more money than the regular staff nurses at an organization. This creates a strain between coworkers that can be carried into the workplace if not careful. Organizations have many different needs but since the pandemic, the issue of travel nurses and wages has become more talked about. There should be policies in place so that this scenario does not occur.

Specific Needs for Staffing Shortages

Nurses are required to continue to work through tough times when resources are allocated elsewhere, seemingly unfair (Kelly & Porr, 2018). I selected the national healthcare issue of appropriate staffing needs and nursing shortages. One condition that impacts this issue is the lack of funds to pay nurses fair wages. One short-term solution to the issue of staffing shortages is to utilize travel and registry nurses. The problem with this is that it is a short-term and very costly solution. These nurses are paid much higher wages than regular staff nurses and then after their contract, they are gone and the unit is once again short staffed. Organizations should be focused on other solutions that will last longer over time. Policies should be made to assist in this. One solution is to retain the staff nurses that are already working there. Most organizations do not give high or frequent increases in wages which is a big reason for high nurse turnover rates. If these organizations had access to use the resources of funds previously allocated for travel or registry nurses, they may be able to offer their regular staff a wage increase or just a bonus. This way, the funds are still being allocated to the short staffed unit but it acts as an incentive for the regular staff nurses to continue coming to work. This can be considered a gamble though and any use of money resources needs to be thoroughly thought through by nurse leaders.

Conclusion

In conclusion, resource allocation is seen in every nursing organization. Nurse leaders are responsible for determining what areas need what resources and when. As mentioned above, there are many different scenarios and needs depending on the time and place and what is appropriate for the organization at that time. Overall, it is essential for nurse leaders to be comfortable making these decisions for the greater good.


The nursing shortage is a national healthcare issue. It has become a major stressor on the healthcare system. There is a myriad of causes for the problem, but most can agree that the shortage of nurses can lead to errors that put the patients at risk (Haddad et al., 2022). The stress caused by the shortages prompts some to take short cuts that affects the nurse’s effectiveness causing ethical dilemmas.

According to Milliken (2018), every interaction between a nurse and a patient has potential ethical impact.  It further suggests that many nurses are not aware that routine nursing tasks can have ethical repercussions. Nurses need to be taught to recognize and mitigate potential ethical dilemmas (Milliken, 2018).

Haddad et al. (2022) shows us that the aging population requires more nursing care. It also reports that approximately one-third of nursing professionals are over the age of 50 and are slated to retire in the next decade.  The shortage is compounded by a lack of faculty to teach new nurses, and organizations such as The National Academy of Medicine lobbying for a policy mandating that facilities have 80% of their nurses holding a Baccalaureate degree (Straka et al., 2019).With some organizations calling for even more advanced education in order to become a Nurse, the time needed to replace the retiring nurses is lengthened (Broome & Marshall, 2021).

Some of the competing needs that impact the issue of the nursing shortage are the fact that there is an immediate increased need for nurses due to the increased patient load caused by an aging population. There is also an urgent need to train healthcare professionals to replace the retiring nurses. One study suggests that using virtual reality can speed up and enhance training making training nurses faster and less expensive (Shorey & Ng, 2021). Policies that accept the use of new teaching technologies to teach certain skills would help alleviate the backlog on nurse education. Policies that would continue to accept ADN nurses would also reduce the educational investment needed to bring new staff onboard.


Quality healthcare should be important to everyone in the healthcare profession for more than one reason: we have two jobs, one the care we provide and two improving the system in which we work. When implementing policy, it is often done with the intent to improve standards that are already in place or for standardized guidelines. According to Mozafaripour (2022), health policies are essential to establish guidelines that benefit the patient, the organization, and the healthcare system.  But should that be the only reason? One could argue that it is rather pointless not to incorporate or consider the needs of the staff who ensures the smooth operation of an organization’s daily operations; however, some see the employees as nothing more than a business relationship and taking the employees’ emotions, feelings, and suggestions into consideration is neither essential nor worthwhile.

While many may argue that nursing shortages existed before the pandemic, there is no doubt that the pandemic has amplified the number of nurses that have exited the profession.  After the pandemic, many nurses suffered from multiple mental health challenges, countless frustration, and immense reports of burnout. Amid all this, they were still expected to offer standardized quality care with unreasonable demands with limited resources. These unrealistic demands further frustrated nurses and gave them no choice but to leave the profession. It is one thing to be dealing with being abused physically, mentally, emotionally, and verbally, but having to deal with little or no resources, inadequate compensation, an increase in demand for quality care, and not having the proper infrastructures in place to do so further forced nurses to seek less demanding jobs roles.

As noted by Kelly and Porr (2018), the excessive workload is a severe issue because of its widespread nature and long-term effects on burnout and retirement from the field.

Organizations are trying everything to cut back on spending and, simultaneously, demand an improvement in the standard of service at the expense of the nurse’s mental health and well-being. In some organizations, the nurse is the phlebotomist, the clerk, the patient care technician, the janitor, etc., while still being required to offer efficient and quality services to patients. Practices of such should be halted, and the general population should be made aware so that new guidelines for safer practices can be implemented.

Without proper security for better, safer working conditions and improvement in resources, the improvement in quality services and patient care will be at further risk. Between our growing population, and people living longer due to the advancement in healthcare and technology being used to improve the quality of life for many, the demand for more nurses is in full effect; however, due to the unsafe nurse-to-patient ratio and the increasing abuse against nurses, many nurses are moving away from the bedside. In some hospitals, nurses are forced to care for up to 10 patients, increasing medication error, mortality rate, frustration, and burnout. In a Detroit hospital, nurses recently filed a wrongful termination lawsuit after they alerted state authorities of their concerns about poor nursing staffing conditions that led to unnecessary patient death (Galea & Galea, 2022). One of the roles and responsibilities of a nurse is ethically “to do no harm,” In doing no harm, it is also the nurse’s responsibility to advocate for the patient’s needs, especially when the patient’s life is endangered. Having to deal with these unsafe practices constantly has further frustrated nurses leading to rapid turnover and nurses moving away from a once-loved role. Healthcare leaders must enforce/implement regulations that will see nurses practicing safely to improve the outcome of patients.

Since the demand for care and treatment has grown significantly, the level of frustration by our patients and their families has also increased. With this increase, the attacks against nurses have also increased, and in places such as the ER, outpatient clinics, and medical-surgical units, the nurse-to-patient ratio is excessive. Healthcare administrators consistently strive to improve the quality of care for patients; however, not implementing policies and guidelines to maintain the safety of their staff will further see a depletion of nurses moving away from the bedside.

Costa and Friese (2022) recommend that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) adopt laws to promote safe nursing care and give nurses better working conditions, appropriate compensation, and benefits to enhance patient outcomes. They also recommended that Congress fund the creation of new, safer healthcare systems and expand the testing of safety measures and procedures to improve the well-being of healthcare workers. All nurses should champion these strategies to ensure that the preservation of the profession is continuously upheld to its highest standards and not dwindled down the drain at the expense of this cooperation to save money and ensure the lives of the people we commit to serving are not treated unsafely or endangered.


Competing Needs Impacting Policy Development

The administration of a healthcare institution operates similarly to that of any other business, with the significant goals of maximizing profit, increasing patient outcomes, lessening maintenance expenses, and efficient resource use. When resources and the workforce are unavailable to satisfy these expectations that arise simultaneously and strive to be satisfied together might result in conflicting demands. As a result, there are conflicts between the distribution of resources and the setting of priorities by end users, such as nurses (Kelly & Porr, 2018). To attain the quadruple aim of patient satisfaction, affordable health care, population health, and healthcare worker satisfaction, it is morally, legally, and ethically necessary to deliver the finest patient care to all patients regardless of their background. The rising cost of healthcare, arguably due to the ongoing development of life-saving medication and healthcare technology, has made it more difficult for those who cannot afford healthcare costs to access high-quality care equally. Due to the conflicting needs of employers and employees, mistakes such as medication errors have increased, and nurses’ board licenses have been affected. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 and other healthcare laws have been implemented to eliminate the healthcare disparity brought on by the high cost of healthcare (KEN, 2022).

Competing Needs Impacting Selected National Healthcare Issue/Stressor

The National Health Council (NHC) is dedicated to encouraging the development of a society where everyone has fair access to high-quality medical care. The rising healthcare costs brought on by technical and medical innovation are one of the biggest obstacles to achieving health fairness. Health services for individuals and groups based on evidence-based professional knowledge are considered to provide quality treatment because they are more likely to result in desired health outcomes. Health services must be prompt, egalitarian, integrated, and efficient to have the desired effects of excellent healthcare (WHO, n.d.). According to the NHC (2021), dental treatment is the most common form of care individuals report delaying because of cost, with just half of US adults reporting being able to pay healthcare expenditures. Many facets of healthcare, including hearing treatments, dental work, and prescription medication expenditures, are reported to be challenging to pay for by sizable percentages of persons 65 and older. Adults without insurance, individuals of color, and people who fall below the poverty line are disproportionately impacted by healthcare expenditures. A third of persons with health insurance are concerned about paying their monthly premium, and 44% are concerned about meeting their deductible before their insurance begins to pay benefits (Montero et al., 2022). A significant portion of Americans is burdened by healthcare debt, with 41% of individuals reporting that they owe money for medical or dental expenses, including obligations to credit cards, collection agencies, family members, friends, banks, and other lenders (Montero et al., 2022). The number one concern for Americans today is how to pay for petrol and transportation expenses, which is followed by unforeseen medical expenses (NHC, 2021). Other barriers to accessing high-quality care include the inability of healthcare providers to exchange medical information due to a lack of interoperability, the staffing shortage caused by burnout, the need to hire and retain employees, and the requirement that clinicians receive training in the newest medical technology. Patient safety is crucial for the healthcare system, with increased hospital-acquired infections in 2020. These are competing needs that attract healthcare expenditures before they can be achieved. Also, healthcare inequalities the disadvantaged patient population encounters, such as racial and gender bias inequities, must be addressed (Wolters Kluwer, 2022).

The Impacts and Ways Policy Address Competing Needs

The impacts of these conflicting needs are evident when hospitals have an influx of patients in the ER with easily manageable conditions that have been exacerbated due to healthcare inaccessibility. Also, the poll shows a racial disparity where high quality is less accessible to Blacks and Hispanics, low-income earners, and underserved communities (Montero et al., 2022). The NHC Reducing HCC Initiative evaluates various suggestions for legislation to bring down healthcare prices. The NHC has recognized four major policy priority areas, and its Board of Directors, with input from its members, are reducing barriers to the development of generic and biosimilar products, expediting approval of specific generic applications, improving coverage and reimbursement requirements to expand patient access and promote value, and promoting meaningful transparency on price and cost-sharing. The NHC is dedicated to expanding access to long-term, reasonably priced, high-value care across its programs and policy initiatives. Any savings realized from reforming policies should be immediately invested in ways that would help patients and the systems that support them. Promoting value as defined by the patient must be the foundation of all initiatives to lower healthcare expenditures (NHC, 2021).


Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues

In theory, a problem or a need can easily be identified and addressed with a simple solution and implementation of a policy or procedure; however, it rarely if ever works this simply, especially in health care. Competing needs of patients such as safe care and of those involved in the decision-making process as well as resources available, including money and workforce, have varying influence on what issues are addressed and how. All these needs are important to consider to ensure organizational success overall as well as success of the policy or policy change. Parkhurst et al. (2021) discuss competing interests on a much larger scale and in regard to malaria, but makes great points about how formulating health policy is not only about evaluating the evidence of what needs (i.e., patient needs and care team needs) are to be met but that many factors need to be considered in this formulation including stakeholders, power dynamics and interests, and the context of the organization itself. The formulation of policy is therefore multifaceted and complex.

Competing Needs, Policy, and APRN Practice Authority

Regarding the issue of limited scope of practice for nurse practitioners (NPs) and other APRNs, competing needs need to be considered as well. State laws and regulations determine whether NPs and other advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) have full, reduced, or restricted scope of practice; however, facilities and organizations can further restrict scope of practice even further with their own policies (Winter et al., 2021).  In addition to policy restrictions, additional barriers to APRN full practice include lack of resources, poor relations with administration and physicians, and the profession being misunderstood and unrecognized – these barriers can also be considerations for competing needs affecting policy (Schirle et al., 2020). For instance, if the stakeholders do not value nor fully understand the skillset of APRNs and lack the additional resources to promote full practice authority of APRNs within the parameters of the law when resources are already allocated to physicians, policy change in favor of full practice authority is less likely to happen. Also competing needs to be considered, patient safety is a concern for some in relation to allowing APRNs to have full, autonomous practice authority as well as the possibility of increased costs and health care system strain (American Medical Association, AMA, n.d.; Robeznieks, 2020). These competing needs can lead to further miscommunication regarding APRN professions, the value they can bring to healthcare in general and to each specific organization, and consequently negatively impact future efforts to expand APRN practice authority. To address these competing needs, policy can make steps to expand APRN practice authority but with parameters and detailed explanations of roles of each member of the healthcare team to sponsor understanding of their role. Regarding practice authority, like Assembly Bill AB 890 that promotes full practice authority of NPs in California and was signed into law in 2020, organizational policy can make supervisory requirements for NPs and other APRNs, leading to eligibility to qualify for more autonomous practice over time and with more experience (California Board of Registered Nursing, n.d.). These changes can help build APRN relations with other organizational team members, promote patient safety, justify the use of additional resources or the reallocation of resources, and exhibit that no additional strain on the organization will result but that APRNs can be positive health care team members.


How Competing Need Impact Policy Development

Healthcare policies work within the healthcare system to shape and protect everyone and everything within the walls of the hospital. Healthcare policies address healthcare access, delivery of care, cost of care, and privacy and patients and healthcare employees. Policies within healthcare are essential as they assist with the placement of guidelines to benefit everyone within the healthcare system. Policies work to prevent error and poor communication when it comes to decisions of medicine. Examples of healthcare policies could include patient care, drugs, safety and security, and employee health (University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, 2021). All of these compete for the need of policy development as they are all essential to a functional and safe space in healthcare.

Competing Needs that Impact the Nursing Shortage

As discussed last week, the nursing shortage is a big issue with many factors at hand. With the nursing shortage comes a lack of educators, an increased turnover rate, and unequal distribution of work. Most units are working understaffed and with high acuity patients. This causes nurses to feel unsafe in caring for patients and unsatisfied as they are doing the best they can, yet it is not enough. Nursing staff shortages lead to an increase in human errors, patient and nursing dissatisfaction, and higher mortality rates. This leads to nursing burnout, increased stress levels, and the health of the nurse is now being jeopardized (Haddad et al., 2022).

How can Policies Impact Competing Needs

Ensuring that the workload of nurses is adequate when caring for higher acuity patients will not only ensure that patient’s are safer and happier, but also assist with nursing burnout. As mentioned previously unsafe and high workloads lead to nursing job dissatisfaction and therefore nurses are more likely to leave. This increases nursing turnover and another nurse is gone. Implementing policy of patient staffing and patient acuity will assist in keeping nurses happy and patient’s safer. Adequate staffing levels can result in a decrease of mortality rates, shorter hospital stays, and improved patient and nursing outcomes (Zhavoronkov et al., 2022).


Competing Needs Impacting Policy Development

Forming and implementing new policies in healthcare can be a lengthy and arduous process. When writing policies, we must ensure that we are doing so with ethical practice in mind. Additionally, we must also consider patient care, billing, and data security (Writing Policies and Procedures in Healthcare, 2020). Policy making in healthcare is an involved process that should not be taken lightly.

Competing Needs Impacting the Nursing Shortage

The slow trickle of nurses leaving the profession or retiring has quickly become a hemorrhage that has led to the nursing shortage. Nurses are leaving the bedside or leaving nursing all together. Burnout is a strong contributor to this loss of nurses (Yang & Mason, 2022). As stated in the required media for this week, nurses and nurse practitioners are having to work double shifts to cover the gaps left by the nursing shortage (Walden University, LLC. (Producer), 2009b). This can lead to and worsen burnout. One could say that a competing need impacting the nursing shortage is the nurse’s own well-being. However, we can combat this by providing resources to nurses who are struggling with burnout.

Policy to Address Needs

Facilities should provide nurses with support during trying times. This can be in the form of EAPs (Employee Assistance Programs) run through their insurance. There should be policies in place for nurses to understand how to access these programs. The promotion of self-care for nurses is crucial. As the saying goes, “you can’t pour from an empty cup.”


Several variables contribute to the complex situation of the nursing shortage. These variables include low salaries, poor working conditions, an increasingly aging population, and a lack of nursing faculty to educate new nurses. Broome & Marshall 2021 discuss the nursing shortage and address that one of the biggest threats of having understaffed faculty is the inability to prepare new nurses in school. In 2014/15, 68,936 qualified students were turned away due to these shortages. Although increasing student enrollment will help in alleviating the shortage, other essential factors such as long-term nurse workforce growth and retention can be done by giving nurses access to a secure and encouraging work environment. Even if we fix the problem with increased faculty, we still need to retain these nurses with a better working environment.

There are several policies in place that primarily protect the health and well-being of our staff and patients. These policies are a set of rules and guidelines that help ensure that we are providing our patients with the best care possible. Unfortunately, these policies are not always followed when it comes to our staff. The development of policies regarding safe patient ratios and proper PPE hasn’t always been followed. When these policies aren’t being followed it may cause an ethical dilemma for nurses when providing the best care possible. In Walden University’s video about ethical, moral, and legal leadership, Terry Mahan Buttaro, FAANP states “The moral, legal and ethical implications of practice are all back to the value of providing the best patient care for the community and the individual patient. That is what being a healthcare provider is all about”. According to Milliken, 2018, “Ethical awareness involves recognizing the risk that nursing actions could fail to adhere to the goals of nursing, thereby violating an ethical principle”.

The nursing shortage is a global issue and will continue to be this way until several areas are improved. New policies regarding incentives and bonuses to help acquire and retain nursing faculty can help with this issue. Increasing faculty staff will help with the recruitment of new nurses, however, policymakers should have other considerations regarding pay and workforce environments. This can include tuition reimbursement, sign-on bonuses, and the ability to offer a proper work-life balance. Travel nursing has taken a lot of our core staff away due to the higher pay and more flexible schedule. Policy regarding safe patient ratios really needs to be enforced as well to help retain our nursing staff and prevent burnout.


When developing a policy, various factors and needs must be considered, including workforce needs, resources, and patients. These competing needs can impact the development of a policy in several ways.

For example, the workforce’s needs, such as ensuring adequate staffing levels and maintaining a safe working environment, may conflict with the requirements of patients, such as providing timely and efficient care. If a policy is developed to reduce staffing costs, it might increase workload and stress for the remaining staff, negatively impacting patient care and outcomes (Jun et al., 2021).

As COVID-19 cases surged in the US, healthcare systems became overwhelmed, leading to hospital beds, medical supplies, and healthcare worker shortages. This created a difficult balance between allocating resources to COVID-19 patients and those with other health conditions. It also led to many nurses and healthcare workers facing burnout. In a study completed with over 50,000 nurses, “For nurses who had considered leaving their position (n = 676 122), 43.4% identified burnout as a reason that would contribute to their decision to leave their current job (Shah et al., 2021).” 

Not only were nurses overworked and understaffed, but travel contracts for nurses soared throughout the pandemic, and many nurses were often leaving their primary jobs to join traveling agencies to make more money. That then caused some hospitals to need more nurses regarding their staffing ratios. Nurses that were required to care for more patients than they could handle safely caused increased workload and stress, which led to many of them quitting their job in healthcare altogether.

 Adequate staffing levels are necessary to meet patient needs and prevent nursing burnout, but budget constraints may limit staffing levels (Bielickj et al., 2020). It is essential to recognize that policies may have unintended consequences and that ongoing evaluation and feedback from stakeholders are necessary to ensure policies remain effective and responsive to changing needs.


Competing needs within the healthcare system happen on a daily basis. When we look at competing needs and how they may impact the development of new policies, we need to remember that balancing healthcare issues and the competing needs is an act that leaders and management cannot take lightly. Some competing needs within the healthcare setting are budgeting restraints, aging work field nurses, nurse to patient ratios and the common shortage of nurses. When healthcare facilities create new policies such as those surrounding ethics, the healthcare issue of nursing shortages and burnout come up and can cause issues with fully practicing by that new policy. The code of ethics plays a huge role in healthcare and nursing. When there is an increase in nursing shortages such as recently due to Covid-19, ethics become an issue. According to Kelly & Porr (2018), nurses have become accustomed to not speaking up when they have been told what or how to do something that they know is unethical because of possible policies and or working short staffed. When nurses or providers cut corners to get things done because they are short staffed or facilities tell them to do these things, they are put in ethical situations that can cause an increase in burnout. Milliken, (2018) referenced the same and that often times providers and nurses are prepared due to training, education or management to deal with ethical considerations and this can increase the risk of burnout and create more moral distress.

One way that healthcare facilities can help with the issues such as staff burnout and shortages is creating a policy that designates a nurse to patient ratio. While most facilities state they have ratios, these ratios are not always upheld due to staffing issues. By implementing a policy stating for instance one Registered Nurse may not have more than 5 patients per shift with the following stipulations of acuity of the patient, if there are special needs for the patient such a sitter or devices in which aid the patient with ADL’s. When the acuity of the patient is higher, having a load of 5 patients still places the patient and the staff at risk for injury, burnout, ethical dilemmas.  Congress introduced the bill S.1567 in 2021 which is the Nurse Staffing Standards for Hospital Patient Safety and Quality Care Act. This bill states that hospitals must create and submit to the Department of Health and Human Services a minimum nurse to patient ratio. This bill was introduced to help nurses maintain safe and adequate patient staff ratios. In this bill, nurses may refuse the assignment if it is above the minimum ratio. Congress (2021). This type of bill I feel is a must and while staffing is an issue, staffing may get better when nurses hear about specific policies and or bills such as staff to patient ratios. The decrease in burnout, moral distress and unethical decision making will happen because staff are finally being heard.


The physician shortage issue affects the workplace and is also a national problem. A report by the Association of American Medical Colleges highlighted a need for approximately 122,000 physicians by 2032 in the United States (Ahmed & Carmody, 2020). An organization’s policy must address the issue and guarantee quality and safe patient care. However, the organization’s resources must meet all the needs to ensure smooth operation and realization of distinct patient needs. Currently, healthcare facilities in the United States are pressured to simultaneously lower expenses and maintain quality outcomes (Akinleye et al., 2019). Therefore, various organizational needs are competing for financial resources. This discussion post outlines the competing need for drug availability and its effect on developing an organizational policy addressing physician shortage. Furthermore, the post will identify the impacts and how the policy may address the competing needs with examples.

There are various needs in the healthcare organization competing for the available financial resources. The issue of physician policy requires an organizational policy that will ensure the recruitment of an adequate workforce. Such a policy needs funding, leading to increased organizational costs (Terregino et al., 2021). The process of ensuring adequate physicians entails recruitment, training, and retaining. A new physician’s onboarding and recruitment fee is approximated at $500 000 and above annually (Terregino et al., 2021). From this perspective, the organizational policy will compete with other necessities, such as the availability of enough healthcare provisions, such as drugs. The healthcare organization must ensure that sufficient prescription drugs are in stock to enhance patient care. The facility requires much money to buy prescription medicines sold at a high price because of limited competition in the drug market (Vincent Rajkumar, 2020). At this point, the evidence confirms that drugs are a competing need for an organizational policy requiring the hiring of adequate physicians.

The purchase of drugs is vital to successful patient care. However, the high cost of prescription drugs and the need for more physicians increase the demand for financial resources. A lack of adequate funds increases the risk of compromised patient care (Kelly & Porr, 2018). A shortage of prescription drugs raises safety and patient care issues. Therefore, the healthcare organization must prioritize its procurement. On the other hand, hiring an adequate physician staff is a prerequisite. At this juncture, the healthcare organization needs a policy directing the distribution of resources to ensure all the competing needs are met to promote efficiency and quality of care. For instance, the organization may adopt a financing policy establishing the funds available for physician recruitment and prescription medicine (Tikkanen et al., 2020). Identifying money allocated for each need will reduce competition and ensure the healthcare organization has enough medicine and physicians. The physician shortage problem can be solved through an organizational policy advocating recruiting more healthcare professionals.

Healthcare organizations need to pay more attention to the problem of physician shortage. Developing an effective organizational policy depends on finding a balance between competing needs. From this discussion, it can be established that a financing policy has the potential to eliminate unnecessary competition for funding for drugs and the hiring of more physicians, and ensure all services are available to patients.


How competing needs may impact the development of a policy

In the nursing arena it appears that there are frequent times of loss of focus being on the patient, their care, and why the staff and medical facility exist and their role of the care of the patient population.   When policies are being addressed, the financial cost aspect is oftentimes the driving force behind the development of policies.  Healthcare organizations look deeply into ways to minimalize financial cost and burden, while assuring an adequate nurse staffing ratio is met. Finding the means to balance both the needs of the patient and the nurse alike has a direct impact on national healthcare issues and policy development (Patricio, 2020).

Failed policy leads directly to shortages or overages of nursing and clinical staff.  These failures not only have a fiscal effect, but the failures also have a direct impact on quality and quantity of patient care.

Specific competing needs that may impact workload

Specific competing needs that largely impact workload are the needs of both nurses and patient populations. These needs are on the forefront of national healthcare issues.  Healthcare facilities and organizations frequently seek out change and look at exploring creative ways of balancing staffing and patient ratio needs.

Again, the balance that all organizations are seeking to rectify is the balance between quality care in a safe care environment and employing qualify nursing staff that all associated costs with these servic3s are the most cost effective (Holland, 2019). Equal distribution of workload and manageability of the workload requires a balance between patient needs and nursing staff ratios.

 

The impacts and how policy might address these competing needs

Burnout levels are on the rise here in the U.S. and many career nurses are leaving the field for good.  These past three years in particular have been very taxing and difficult on nurses across the globe.  While many policies and procedures were brought into existence during the COVID-19 pandemic, they were simply not able to compete with the patient care crisis.

Overworked nursing staff during the pandemic, fueled by lack of policy in place to cover such a medical crisis, assisted by the daily changing needs of the COVID positive patient population, led directly to high rates of job dissatisfaction, burnout, and widespread errors. Post Covid, there have been many changes in policy in an attempt to be more prepared should another pandemic like COVID arise unexpectedly in the future.  While these policies look at the future ahead, they cannot make up for what has happened due to the fallout of COVID.

Nursing ratios must be kept in a strict guideline format and policy needs to reflect the ratio guidelines.


How Completing Needs Impact Policy Development

Competing needs are an inherent part of the policy development process, and they can significantly impact the development of healthcare policies. These competing needs can include the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients. The workforce’s needs are significant and can impact policy development as healthcare professionals require adequate resources, support, and incentives to provide high-quality patient care (Kelly & Porr, 2018). If healthcare policies fail to address the workforce’s needs, it can result in healthcare providers being overworked, stressed, and underpaid, leading to burnout and a shortage of healthcare providers. Therefore, policymakers must consider the workforce’s needs when developing healthcare policies.

The availability of resources, such as funding, technology, and infrastructure, is another critical factor impacting policy development. Healthcare policies need to be developed in a way that ensures that there is an equitable distribution of resources across different healthcare facilities and regions (Kelly & Porr, 2018). Policies that fail to consider the needs of resources can result in healthcare disparities, with some communities being underserved and lacking access to essential healthcare services.

Finally, the needs of patients are also a critical consideration when developing healthcare policies. Policies must ensure patients receive high-quality, safe, and affordable healthcare services. Policies should also address issues like access to healthcare services, patient rights, and privacy. Healthcare policies that do not prioritize the needs of patients can result in poor health outcomes, patient dissatisfaction, and increased healthcare costs.

 

Competing Needs that impact Access to Healthcare for Low-Income Population

Access to healthcare is a fundamental human right, yet it still needs to be discovered for many low-income populations. Several competing needs can significantly impact access to care for this vulnerable group. First and foremost, the needs of the healthcare workforce can create a shortage of healthcare providers in low-income areas. Low-income communities may need more providers as healthcare providers may prefer to work in higher-income areas with better resources and higher salaries (Khullar & Chokshi, 2018). Additionally, the need for help, such as funding and technology, can impact access to care for low-income populations. Limited financing for healthcare facilities in low-income areas can result in a lack of resources, outdated technology, and limited infrastructure, all of which can affect access to care.

Furthermore, the needs of patients can also impact access to care for low-income populations. Many low-income individuals face multiple barriers to care, including lack of transportation, limited availability of appointments, and inability to pay for necessary treatments. Policies that do not prioritize the needs of low-income patients can result in healthcare disparities and further limit access to care.

Competing needs can significantly impact access to care for low-income populations. Policymakers need to consider the needs of the healthcare workforce, resources, and patients when developing policies to address this issue. Failure to do so can lead to unintended consequences, such as increased healthcare disparities and limited access to care (Khullar & Chokshi, 2018). Policymakers must prioritize equitable access to care for all populations, regardless of socioeconomic status.

 

How can Policies Impact Competing Needs

Policies can have a significant impact on competing needs to access for low-income populations. Policies that prioritize equitable access to resources and services can help to reduce barriers and ensure that low-income populations have access to the resources they need. For example, policies that provide funding for affordable housing can help to address the competing needs of low-income populations by making housing more affordable and accessible (Kreuter et al., 2020). Similarly, policies that provide access to healthcare, education, and job training can help to address competing needs by providing resources and support to individuals who may otherwise struggle to access these services.

On the other hand, policies that prioritize the interests of wealthy individuals and corporations may exacerbate competing needs for low-income populations. For example, policies that prioritize tax cuts for the wealthy may reduce funding for social programs and public services, making it more difficult for low-income populations to access the resources they need (Kreuter et al., 2020).

Overall, policies that prioritize equitable access to resources and services are more likely to have a positive impact on competing needs for low-income populations, while policies that prioritize the interests of the wealthy may exacerbate these needs.

 

ConclusionTop of Form

In summary, policymakers need to carefully consider the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients when developing healthcare policies to promote equitable access to healthcare services. Failure to address any of these needs can have unintended consequences such as healthcare disparities, shortage of healthcare providers, and poor health outcomes. Policies that prioritize equitable access to care can help reduce these disparities and improve health outcomes for all populations, regardless of their socioeconomic status. Therefore, policymakers must balance the competing needs and develop policies that can address them to promote equitable access to healthcare services.


How Competing Needs Impact Development Policy

The aging of the baby boomer population has increased the demand for nurses in healthcare.  We also have the impact of COVID-19 on top of the demand.  Often, I read that nurses make up the largest population of the healthcare industry, yet there seems to be a problem retaining nurses (AACN, 2022).  Nursing schools are still in business and turning out new graduates continuously, but little focus is put towards keeping the new nurses employed or even in the field at all.   Policies are usually driven by a need therefore it is reasonable to say competing needs of healthcare do lead to policy development,

Competing Needs Impacting Nurse Retention

Nurses are faced with the strain of being forced to follow the business model of healthcare when we were taught to follow the treat-heal-care model in nursing school (Kelly & Porr, 2018).  The stress of trying to care for our patients in a holistic, patient-centered manor along with trying to follow the business centered policy is causing nurses to have inward resentment that causing nurses to strike out towards other coworkers and patients.  This hostility creates a negative work environment causing a problem with nursing retention organization-wide as well as profession-wide.  Pay is another competing need that is impacting nurse retention.  Nurses are finding themselves working alongside other nurses who are from a travel agency making more than double their wages.  Again, this is leading to a negative work environment as well as a negative attitude towards the nursing profession all together.  Unfortunately, the world is always going to have sickness and need for healthcare providers, that need isn’t going to change.  The focus now is how do we address the needs and develop policies to address the competing needs that seem to influence nurse retention rates.

How Policy Might Address Nurse Retention

The Nurse Practice Act (Provision 6), talks about the work environment and how nurses have an obligation to create a good work environment and how work environmental factors can lead to ethical and professional fulfillment or it can hinder ethical and professional environment (ANA, 2015).  In regards to nurses facing the strain from trying to follow the business model of the organization and their desire to provide patient-centered care, executive nursing staff has the ability to create a more positive work environment by including nurses in decision policy decisions.  Develop committees from each department within the organization and have meetings to discuss concerns and try to reach compromise that will not financially harm the organization and still allow nurses to put patient care first.  In terms of nurses harboring resentment towards outside agency staff, nursing executives can implement a policy stating before utilizing outside sources, the shifts should be offered to organization staff nurses at an incentive pay.  This will cut down on hostility towards each other and promote a better work environment.  There is no way to ever create an environment pleasing to all but it is our duty to try to be fair and reasonable.   As nurses we must remember how it feels to work short and how we need nurses, therefore, we should try to make all efforts to work together not against one another.   After all, our Nurse practice Act states “the workplace must be a morally good environment to ensure ongoing safe, quality patient care and professional satisfaction for nurses and to minimize and address moral distress, strain, and dissonance” (ANA, 2015).  This is a must if the profession wants to retain nurses.


Competing needs can be a huge stressor in the workforce. To be able to provide the best care for patient’s proper resources are a necessity. The healthcare issue/stressor that I picked was that of the opioid epidemic and overdoses that occur due to opiate dependency. Resources that would be needed for this subject would be proper educational material for patient’s and providers that help address signs and symptoms of dependency, which can hopefully lead to a decrease in overdoses and addiction rates. Education on different forms of pain management that steer away from opioids.” The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has developed tools, as part of its NIDAMED initiative, to educate health care professionals about how to identify and treat patients with opioid use disorders. The materials include continuing medical education (CME), screening and assessment tools, and opioid prescribing resources” (“Improving opioid prescribing,” 2022). By providing these educational materials and additional resources providers and patients can look at different avenues for pain management, become more aware of when opioid dependency is starting to occur and can address what pain levels require opiates and which would be better managed with other medications. The issue with making a policy regarding this topic would be determining how you can label pain in a universal manner in which all patients can benefit from the policy being made. We never want to under treat pain and we want to make sure that the medication being given is appropriate for the type of pain a patient is feeling. Pain tends to be a person dependent which can make it more difficult to create a policy that would apply to all patients. The competing needs can be difficult for many reasons but lack of resources would be the main factor. The facility you work for may not have the budget or ability to allow for extra staff to provide these resources. Which can lead to patient’s falling through the cracks and being provided opiates to address pain when something else may be better suited for the patient. If a policy is created showing that additional resources are needed for the overall benefit and better outcome for the patient, additional funds may be allocated, allowing for safer medication practices.


Healthcare is an evolving field. Aging workforces and populations, technological advances, growing demands for care, and regulatory constraints are all barriers to adequate treatment being provided (McNally 2018). Providing high quality healthcare is influenced majorly by the workforce so policies and procedures in place are key to delivering efficient healthcare, rather than attempting to make policies in crisis situations (McNally 2018).

When psychiatric nurses are exposed to workplace violence repeatedly with inadequate debriefing and follow-up, nurses can experience PTSD, burnout, turnover, decreased quality of care, and higher nurse-patient ratios related to short staffing (Dean et al. 2021).

Healthcare has accepted that there is a risk for violence in the workplace, especially working with high-risk populations, but that doesn’t mean it should be expected. A zero-tolerance policy should be in place, meaning that administrators will react to any complaints of verbal, physical, and sexual abuse promptly (Emergency Nurses Association). Although a zero-tolerance policy can’t stop every threat, special training should be offered to staff on how to handle aggressive situations, crisis teams should be present at facilities to immediately intervene in dangerous situations, and facilities should be inspected frequently to minimize risk factors of violence (Emergency Nurses Association). Evidence-based practice is the best way to implement policies to help avoid situations from arising.

Develop a 2 to 3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

To Prepare:

  • Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.
  • Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
  • Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

The Assignment (2-3 Pages):

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Develop a 2 to 3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
  • Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
  • Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting.| Which social determinant(s) most affects this health issue? 

Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Which social determinant(s) most affects this health issue? Then, describe how your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.


Nursing Retention

In the field of nursing we often face heavy workloads, mentally exhausting, physically exhausting, long hours, high stress,  and working short staffed on a frequent basis.  Now add a national pandemic to intensify the highly stressful occupation in the last 3 years and one can see how nursing retention is an even bigger problem.  Nursing retention focuses on preventing turnover and keeping nurses in the field (Tang & Hudson, 2019).  Nursing burnout and shortage are two of the biggest factors that lead to nursing retention problems.  One factor to be considered in retaining nurses is that the profession and organizational leaders place emphasis on employee well-being.  Employee well-being can be broken down in five areas: Purpose, financial, social, physical, and community well-being (Jacobs et al., 2018).  I’ve recently started a new job working for the federal government at a VA hospital, this has been a big change from the private sector hospital I worked at for 16 years.  The private sector hospital faced major issues with nurse retention.  Nurses who had worked there for years such as myself were leaving due to working stressful jobs with inadequate staffing, poor benefits, lower pay than other hospitals or healthcare sectors, and generally not feeling valued.  Now, I’m working in a federal employment sector where the pay is the well above average, benefits are superb, respect for staff is required, workload is divided fairly in a manor relevant to your level of education, and you are paid based on your years of experience.  With all of those perks to working a federal job, there is still a big problem with nurse retention at the VA.

Social Determinants

One common social determinant that leads to nurses wanting to leave the profession is the mental and physical strain on a nurse.  COVID-19 increased the physical and mental demand of the nursing profession.  In an article written by Butler & Johnson (2020), four social determinants were narrowed down to: Family concerns (childcare, moving, non-job illness, and others); Economic (pay and benefits); Stress (job stress, job illness, other job dissatisfaction, nurse job dissatisfaction, and lay-off concerns); and Other (travel, another occupation, and school).  After COVID hit in early 2020, all of these social determinants were even more affected and caused an even higher rate of nursing job turnover and a mass exodus in the nursing profession.  A survey released by Elsevier in 2022 reveals a prediction that 75% of healthcare workers will leave the healthcare profession by 2025 (Bruisie, 2022).  Nurses make up the biggest population of healthcare workers so if this prediction comes true, healthcare will be in for another transformation and crisis.

My Workplace Retention Strategies

The VA has done some restructuring to improve nurse retention.  The organization has adapted to the Theory of Complex Adaptive Systems which recognizes the need for an organization to adapt to change which leads to new and creative solutions to problems within the system (Broome & Marshall, 2021).  The VA recently owned up to the fact that they were one of the lowest paying organizations in healthcare, nurses received a huge raise in salary as high as 24%.  Registered nurses are given an $8000 sign on bonus to be distributed in 4 payments over a year.  After 1 year of employment, the VA offers the Education Debt Reduction Program (EDRP) which pays up to $200,000 of  student loans.  The benefits such as medical, dental, and vision insurances are offered at great rates and provide excellent coverage with a variety of choices.  Retirement is one of the best on the market matching 5% of employee contribution and paying $.50 on the dollar after 5%.  Paid time for 13 federal holidays as well as earning 12 hours of leave time every 2 weeks.  Last but not least,  nurses get 5 weeks of paid vacation from the start of their career at the VA.  Just to show how good this is to me, my former employer I gave 16 years of my career to matched 3% max on retirement, after 16 years working I was up to 4 weeks vacation I had to pay for using my PTO which I also had to use to cover sick time and days we were closed for holidays.  Progress is being maJade but the VA along with all other healthcare sectors have a long way to go and must stay current with benefit and pay incentives to improve nurse retention rates.  Along with pay and benefits, employee well-being must be given high regard as well to promote a healthy work environment.


One huge healthcare issue that we are all facing today is nursing burnout and shortages. There has been an increase in registered nurses and advanced practice nurses over the years due to the aging population and need for healthcare however, due to the increase in demand for healthcare, this can cause turnover and burnout in the healthcare providers (Broome & Marshall, 2021). One study has shown that physicians and nurse practitioners working together to meet the increased demand of patient care is aimed at preventing burnout  and improving access to and quality of care (Norful, de Jacq, & Carlino, 2018). The supply of physicians over the years has decreased which has not helped the demand of healthcare services needed. The longer medical education needed for physicians contributes to the shorter supply which is where advanced practice nurses can alleviate this constraint since their training is shorter (Auerbach, Staiger, & Buerhaus, 2018).

The shortages and staff burnout has caused many issues within healthcare. Just in the emergency department that I work for, the shortage of nurses we experience is causing us work fatigue and burnout. This has a direct impact on nurse retention. Nurses are leaving the high stress setting of the emergency department to work for a lower stress job. There are times I am taking care of intensive care patients plus emergency care, such as cardiac arrests. This causes nurses to question the care they provide and if is high quality because of the needs of these patients. It also makes them question if their license is at risk.

Social determinants of health such as underserved areas is impacted by the shortage of nurses and providers. A culturally diverse nursing staff can help with more competent care of minorities. However, this cannot be accomplished if there is a shortage of staff. We currently have four nurses on staff in the community emergency department that I work for who are Spanish. The Spanish population in this particular area is high so it is important to have staff that know the culture and language for better patient care. Patients with this ethnic background would be more trusting of healthcare staff that have this culture knowledge and experience (Broome & Marshall, 2021).

The healthcare system I work for is attempting to respond to the shortage to end nursing burnout and turnover. They have hired a nursing recruitment agency that is offering sign-on bonuses in order to attract more nurses. They also have offered overtime bonuses to help with the day-to-day operations and have travel nurses working as well. When it comes to the shortage of providers like physicians and advanced practice nurses, they have been using locum tenens (temporary providers) and float providers within the healthcare system. The float providers bounce from hospital to hospital within the healthcare system. Although there are a couple ways they are trying to assist with the shortage to avoid burnout in staff, it seems these measures aren’t really helping. Some staff work the overtime to help however, we are still losing nurses because they are tired and want a lower stress job.


Lack of Mental Health Resources

Lack of access to mental health resources is a problem that is getting worse. The Covid-19 pandemic put a significant strain on an already strained healthcare system, making providers and organizations do more with less, some even having to close their doors permanently. In April 2020, of the surveyed community mental health facilities, two-thirds stated that due to the current financial climate, they believed they could only keep operating for a maximum of three months (Majlessi, 2020). Organizations had to make significant staff cuts, decreasing their revenue while trying to curtail overhead costs. While it did help decrease the costs associated with daily operations, it also decreased the organization’s capability to service more patients and therefore bring in more income.

The pandemic did bring some innovation to providing healthcare for the medical community. Telehealth was more widely accessible, allowing for expanded services in rural and urban areas. Currently, 150 million Americans live in a federally designated mental health provider shortage area (Weiner, 2022). This problem has been a persistent issue even before the pandemic. Telehealth services can cover these areas, but that is not always an accessible or appropriate solution for all patients.

In Iowa, a state ranked dead last in the country in access to mental health, only two beds are available for every 100,000 people (Carpenter, 2023). This creates backlogs in ER and outlying facilities holding patients waiting for an inpatient bed. Access is impacted by social determinants of race, ability to pay, insurance, and location.

Workplace Response

The unit I currently work in came about as a response to many mental health patients waiting in the Emergency Room (ER) for days, waiting for a bed. This decreased our ER’s ability to see and treat patients as rooms were full of holding patients. As a result, one of our nurse leaders created a crisis observation unit to hold medically cleared psychiatric patients awaiting an inpatient bed. This unit is for adults only, with the possibility of opening a pediatric hold unit. This unit is staffed by psychiatric nurses that can adequately meet these patients’ needs. It also provides the patients more freedom- they have their own room and bathroom, and have access to a common room and complimentary therapy, if desired, rather than waiting in one room for however long it takes to find placement for them. Our psychiatric providers oversee these patients and coordinate care with outside facilities. We have a liaison on-site during the week from a local inpatient hospital to assist with placement in their facility and a telehealth service over the weekend that assists with placement. This unit is open to five beds currently, with plans to expand to twelve beds.


Nurse Practitioner Autonomy

One major healthcare issue we are facing today is a provider shortage. With an ever-aging population, many estimates show that in order to meet the demand for primary care providers there will need to be an additional 52,00 primary care physicians by 2025 (Poghosyan et al., 2018). Primary care provider shortages have caused many states to remove the need for practice agreements between NPs and physicians.  One such state is NY after passing the Nurse Practitioner Modernization Act which would enable NPs to practice without written agreements after 3,600 hours of experience (Poghosyan et al., 2018). Getting society, organizations, and physicians to realize that NPs can be valuable independent providers, especially in primary care, is a national healthcare issue. Likewise, another possible model to decrease strain on primary care is the co-management of patients between NPs and physicians (Norful et al., 2018).  One study showed that this model can alleviate burnout, improve patient quality, and decrease individual workload (Norful et al., 2018).

Current Workplace

            Currently, I work in a correctional setting that hires FNPs, Adult NPs, and PAs as mid-level providers.  Working in a correctional setting we are constantly short-staffed in the medical department including providers and nurses. In my place of work, mid-level providers can treat and provide autonomous care however require a physician to cosign on some prescriptions such as opiates and some psychiatric medications.  Nurse practitioners can also perform simple bedside procedures such as I&Ds, suturing, stapling, and toenail removals.  Recently, the agency I work for also started to hire PMHNPs at medical centers due to the psychiatric provider shortage.  In order to attempt to recruit and retain more providers, the agency I work for has also offered generous 25% recruitment and retention bonuses along with paid moves. While there is room for improvement, the agency I work for has gone through great strides to improve mid-level provider autonomy.

Conclusion

            A study was performed at the VA comparing patient outcomes between patients assigned to an NP versus M.D. in various clinical settings (Liu et al., 2020). The study found that patients assigned to NPs were less likely to use primary care and specialty care services and incurred fewer hospitalizations (Liu et al., 2020).  Likewise, the clinical outcomes, diagnostic workups, and costs were not a significant difference between NPs and MDs (Liu et al., 2020). This shows that NPs can and should be trusted to provide patient care independently since they provide the same or better outcomes compared to MDs in some circumstances.  While some states have allowed NPs to practice autonomously, others still require physician collaboration which puts unnecessary strain on an already strained healthcare system.


Workplace violence can occur physically, sexually, mentally, and through neglect. Violence can include beatings, shootings, rapes, threats, intimidation, harassment, and being cursed at/shouted at (Baker and Alshdefat 2020). Although workplace violence in healthcare is a largely arising issue, nurses working in psychiatric facilities are 20 times more likely to be assaulted than any other field (Baker and Alshdefat 2020). It’s reported that approximately 68/1000 psychiatric nurses are assaulted by patients whereas approximately 21/1000 nurses in other fields report workplace violence (Baker and Alshdefat 2020).

Long term complications of being a victim of workplace violence includes anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), decreased productivity, increased burnout, death, and fear of returning to career but the continuous exposure to violence tends to lead nurses to feel that it’s just an accepted part of their job (Baker and Alshdefat 2020). Short staffing, lack of security, inadequate training, and uncoordinated treatment interventions play a huge role in increasing the risk of workplace violence occurring (Baker and Alshdefat 2020).

Social determinates of workplace violence include patients suffering with untreated mental health disorders, active substance abuse issues, inability to cope with situational crises, access to weapons (such a scissors or metal cans), and their own PTSD from history of violence. Worker risk factors include age, years of experience, gender (women are most likely affected), and absence of training in violent situations (Gillespie et al.).

A couple of months ago I left my job of nearly 3 years at a psychiatric hospital. I loved my job and what I did but the lack of support from management and lack of training for new hires was being physically dangerous. Within a one-year span I was held at gunpoint in the parking lot, spit on, punched, had a printer and desk chair thrown at me, almost received stitches from being hit and scratched, and was kicked in the face due to a new employee not being educated on proper hold techniques. Our facility had no security and an outdated security camera system that never worked, and they had no intentions on changing any of the flaws. During our handle with care training for new hires to learn how to safely do holds, seclusion, and restraints since covid the training was verbal and not hands on. It’s important to understand the steps of things you’re doing to prevent injury to staff and patients before a situation arises.


One of the most in-demand professions nowadays is registered nursing. They offer care in every area associated with health care, including hospitals, doctor’s offices, outpatient care facilities, skilled nursing facilities, behavioral health settings, the home, schools, universities, jails, and workplaces owned and operated by private parties. In addition to being essential patient care providers, nurses play a significant part in addressing health outcomes disparities and enhancing the general well-being of the population (Zhavoronkova et al., 2022).

Nurses have started leaving the healthcare setting in droves, especially since the increased demands placed on them during the pandemic. Nurses have to take on increased patient loads which can adversely affect the rest of the patients they are caring for. These high staffing ratios are a surefire prescription for failure, as anyone who has worked at the bedside can attest. If nurses are given too many patients, they cannot give the best care. Some patients might not get all the required components of evidence-based care, and some requirements might need to be met. It is a system failure, not the nurse’s responsibility that this circumstance exists (Bourgault, 2022).

Some of the social determinants affecting our nursing shortage and burn out are the aging nursing workforce population, increased health demands due to an older population requiring increased care, higher hospital censuses, and greater acuity of the patients. Another major factor is the lack of nursing students that are graduating. Several nursing programs in the United States struggle to build facilities to accommodate qualified nursing candidates. Over 90,000 suitable undergraduate and graduate nursing students were turned away from schools in 2021, according to the AACN’s report 2021-2022 Enrollment and Graduations in Bachelor and Graduate Programs in Nursing. These rejections were due to a need for clinical education sites, classroom space restrictions, and staff (Tamata & Mohammadnezhad, 2022).

Academic Progression in Nursing supported initiatives on two fronts: initiatives that remove barriers that prevent nursing students from earning their BSN, such as support for collaborations between universities and community colleges to enable smooth progression from the associate’s degree (AD) to the baccalaureate; and employment-focused collaborations between schools and healthcare facilities that give students practical experience, encourage greater use of the BSN and create employment opportunities (Gerardi et al., 2018, p. 43).

I currently work in Hospice. We do not have a standard patient-to-nurse ratio. As a whole corporation, they have seen the increased demands on nursing staff and have allotted more nurses to be hired. However, appropriate candidates are hard to find, and few apply. A way our main branch is handling the nursing shortage that we are going through right now is that our director of operations has started to assist with patient admissions and on-call schedules. Our office is working together and being transparent about our difficulties and burnout. This was discussed in Pittman’s article. It was noted how important this was to establish this change (Pittman & Scully-Russ, 2016). Our director of operations is a great leader and checks with the staff daily to see how she can help.

Another significant concern that our director has noticed is taking on new patients that it would take longer than an hour for a nurse to get to. She is looking at how far the patient lives from our main office, and if it is not feasible to provide the proper care to the patient, we send that patient to a different hospice company and ensure they can provide the adequate care required for this patient. Our director is putting her staff first and not the financial bottom line.

In conclusion, the nursing shortage is not a new issue. However, it is now more pronounced as nurses put boundaries into place and expect more from their employers. As healthcare evolves and demands increase, nurses will continue to speak up and advocate for themselves and their patients. The best way to positively affect the nursing shortage and burnout is to listen to what the nurses and health care professionals are saying.  There is not one fix all for this solution. It is gonna have to be tackled company by company throughout the world.


Despite nursing shortages being an issue for many decades in many countries, the global health crisis has impacted the profession significantly. Since the Pandemic, nurses have been exacerbated by its impact. Many nurses were left suffering from mental and psychological exhaustion, frustration, and loss of passion for the love of patient care; these symptoms left many nurses that were highly qualified, skilled, and with years of experience in the profession exiting their roles to venture into different opportunities that were less demanding and stressful. Haines (2022) reported that the proportion of nurses in the profession that are between the ages of 25 and 34 is the largest, but between May 2020 and May 2021, their numbers plummeted by 5.2%, while the second largest proportion of nurses in the age group between 35 and 44 plunged by an even greater 7.4%. Also, the aging population and the need for healthcare have increased the demand for registered and advanced practice nurses over the years; however, the increased demand for healthcare has led to caregiver burnout and turnover (Broome & Marshall, 2021). While many may have theorized that the current problem lies with the number of staff enrolled in the profession being on the frontline, it can be quickly concluded that the actual problem is simply the number of qualified nurses that no longer have the zeal and passion for providing patient care.

I work in the ICU, where my current state and concern for my license are at an all-time high. The impact of nurse shortages has seen nurses practicing unsafely as the nurse-to-patient ratio in a critical setting is unsafe and has caused poor patient outcomes and increased patient stay due to poor nursing practices. Due to the nurse shortages, nurses having to work longer hours further distort their nursing judgment, leading to an increased medication error, increased workplace hostility among staff, and an unsafe working environment. Decreased patient satisfaction is also a significant concern in my work setting because patients have to wait longer for services, e.g., pain medication, thus increasing their suffering. The healthcare setting I am affiliated with was once a magnet institution, which meant the level of nursing services provided was second to none; however, since the satisfaction rate has plummeted drastically due to nursing staff shortages, they no longer hold that status. Hospital-acquired infection such as Catheters-associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) has also increased due to poor management, e.g., Foley cares every 8hrs not being done, Central line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) is also on the rise because of nurse shortages.

According to Haddad et al., 2022, nursing continues to face shortages due to a lack of potential educators, high turnover, and inequitable workforce distribution. Some of the social determinants that have been impacting the nursing shortages are burnout; this is so due to nurses having to work longer working hours to help cushion staff shortages in some facilities, e.g., in some institution, after working a 12hr shift, nurses are mandated to work an extra 4hrs because the facility is short-staffed. Technological advancement has seen people live longer due to new and improved ways to treat many illnesses.  Haddad et al. (2022) postulated that as the population ages, the need for health services increases, and currently, the United States has the highest number of Americans over the age of 65 than any other time in history, with statistics indicating that for 2029, the last of the baby boomer generation will reach retirement age, resulting in a 73% increase in Americans 65 years of age and older, 41 million in 2011 compared to 71 million in 2019. As the baby boom generation reaches retirement age, the population is aging, resulting in a greater need for health services. Another social determinant that has affected nurse shortages is violence in healthcare.  Verbal, physical, and psychological abuse are some of the hostility nurses face daily at the bedside leading to many nurses resigning as caregivers.  According to the World Health Organization (WHO), “between 8 and 38% of nurses suffer from healthcare violence at some point in their career” (Kafle et al., 2022). Because of how common violence and abuse against nurses have become, it has not only led nurses to exit their role in the profession, but its impact has decreased productivity and patient outcomes.

Dr. Brenda Freshman has alluded to the notion that to address future challenges in healthcare, the most crucial thing leaders can do is develop cultural competency, the ability to take multiple perspectives, and a greater understanding of the whole system of the organization (Walden University, 2015).  To help alleviate this issue, my healthcare facility has tried to hire outside recruiters with attractive and competitive pay packages that attract travel nurses to sign a contract for 13-26 weeks and work a 48hr work week. The organization has also hosted job fairs to lure in recent graduates and nurses interested in working for an attractive compensation package with an enormous sign-on bonus for up to three years. Further measures taken by the facility to combat nurse shortages include the implementation of up staffing and mandatory on-calls. To retain their current staff, they have been considering retention bonuses that will help to prevent their highly trained and qualified nurses from resigning. Another effort by the organization to address nurse shortages is the impending introduction of remote nurses, who will support bedside nurses and give them greater flexibility in providing better care for all patients. Finally, more grants and scholarships are introduced for nurses to continue their education, which has seen many nurses capitalize on this opportunity to help boost their morale, which benefits the organization in the long run.

The Healthcare system has suffered immensely since covid, and the aftermath has left many healthcare workers struggling to continue their work at the bedside. The demand for healthcare services has caused more stress to nurses, and as such, despite measures implemented, nurses are still abandoning their roles for jobs that have less stress and demands.


Review of Current Healthcare Issues

Depending on who you ask, answers will vary significantly on what is thought to be the most significant issue facing healthcare today. As nurses, it is important to stay up to date on these national issues so that understanding and implementation can be translated into the workplace. The purpose of this discussion post is to select one current national healthcare issue to reflect on and to think about how it is addressed in the workplace setting.

Nursing Shortages and/or Appropriate Staffing

In America, the total number of working registered nurses is about four million (Baker, 2022). Historically, there have rarely ever been enough nurses to act as a supply for the demand of services needed. Recently, with the COVID-19 pandemic, the supply of registered nurses has decreased while the demand has significantly increased. This is due to many reasons. Some nurses have gotten ill from the pandemic and have not been able to return to work while others have chosen to retire to avoid being surrounded by COVID. Another reason includes burnout and turnover from this increased demand (Broome & Marshall, 2021). When there are not enough nurses available to be scheduled on a unit, organizations are forced to use short-term solutions to provide appropriate care. Some of these short-term solutions include the use of agencies to supply travel nurses as well as bonuses for those already on the payroll (Chervoni-Knapp, 2022). These are considered short-term solutions as they ultimately are not sustainable for organizations to be involved in for a long period of time (Chervoni-Knapp, 2022). Organizations are faced with this tough choice as the alternative of not enough nursing staff would mean that fewer patients are cared for and less money is made for the company. This could result in entire organizations having to shut down which then would lead to significantly fewer beds available for those who are sick. As you can see, there is no perfect solution for this problem and most organizations are trying their best just to get by.

Workplace Impact

I have worked at an inpatient psychiatric facility since 2019. It has been an interesting experience to work before COVID, during COVID, and now, while COVID is decreasing. Before COVID, the unit where I worked was always appropriately staffed, if not overstaffed, on each shift. I remember being canceled every so often as we consistently had more than enough nurses to care for the patients. During COVID, there seemed to never be a day that enough nurses were working. My workplace utilized travel nurses and registry agencies to maintain adequate license-to-patient ratios. A downside to this short-term solution is that for one, these nurses cost a greater amount of money than regular staff nurses do due to the demand as well as these nurses are not familiar with the unit or the company procedures and need time to learn. These downsides created an upset in the unit where I worked. Now, since COVID has been decreasing, my unit has not needed to use travel nurses or agencies to staff it appropriately. We still are not always fully staffed, but accommodations have been made. One is that the organization offers bonuses to staff to come in on their day off if the unit is short. Another is that if another unit has extra staff, they will be floated to my unit for the day to help out. This has been working enough for the past few months. I hope to see soon where the unit starts becoming adequately staffed again.

Conclusion

In conclusion, national nursing and healthcare issues are prevalent throughout America. Every nurse and organization will have an opinion on what they believe is the most significant issue. This being said, the issue of nursing shortages and struggles with appropriate staffing has been endured by most due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, nurses should be educated and aware of these issues so that complete understanding and change can occur.


As many of us pursuing degrees as advanced practiced registered nurses (APRNs) know, despite receiving an expansive education to provide care to patients, the state that we choose to practice in, its laws and regulations, will affect to what capacity we are allowed to practice and utilize the skills we have learned (American Association of Nurse Practitioners, AANP, 2022). Although strides to expand scope of practice for APRNs have evolved over the years, there are still limitations. These limitations are problematic because of shortages in healthcare professionals, particularly advanced practitioners. As Poghosyan et al. (2018) discusses, for example, that more than 50,000 physicians will be needed by 2025 to meet the demand for primary care but the number of physicians are decreasing while the number of nurse practitioners (NPs) that could potentially fill these gaps are increasing. Health care disparities and inequalities are not new topics, but in this world of Covid-19, these disparities and inequalities, the social determinants affecting them, and the resulting patient outcomes have been highlighted and emphasized (Heath, 2020). Heath (2020) continues to state that health inequalities are rooted in the social determinants of health because they can limit an individual’s ability to achieve optimal health and wellness.

For this issue, the social determinant most involved in this topic is health care access and quality, specifically access to time effective and “high-quality health care services,” because limiting the nurse practitioner’s ability to practice to the full extent of their education and knowledge limits how they can be adequately used in every community to contribute to the availability of health care services to the members of those communities (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HHS, n.d.). Nurse practitioners can play an important role in addressing this issue not only because of the increased numbers of nurse practitioners in the workforce but also because of the nursing approach founded in holistic patient care, building a connection with patients, and practicing with compassion and empathy (Heath, 2020). Expanding nurse practitioner scope of practice regulations can allow them to work to their full potential, fill in gaps in care that physicians are unable to, and provide care to the millions in communities with limited access to primary care or other care. For example, the ten states with the most flexible nurse practitioner scope of practice laws and regulations have some of the best overall health outcomes while the ten states with the worst overall health outcomes have the strictest laws and regulations regarding nurse practitioner scope of practice (Heath, 2020). Broome and Marshall (2021) also discuss how APRNs are a resource that should be utilized fully by referencing a study in which “the addition of nurse practitioners (NPs) to an inpatient care team at a single site demonstrated enhanced revenue through gross collections and cost efficiency, reduced overall lengths of stay, and standardized practices to improve quality of care” (p. 71).

As a travel nurse, I see the workings of many different facilities and how functioning with limited staffing versus adequate staffing can affect team communication, timely patient care, and patient outcomes. The lack of more autonomous APRNs in the inpatient setting, from my experience, leads to longer wait times for patients and bedside nurses to hear from the care team about issues that arise and to participate in care team rounds that require the physician to be present. Of course, bedside nurses can call, page, or message the physician, resident, intern, or even the physician assistant if applicable but typically nurse practitioners are not utilized as a functioning, decision-making part of the team which would be valuable. For example, I have had patients complain about feeling neglected by their physician because no one was able to round with them for a day/a few days or that no one from the care team came to see them until late in the day because the physician and team of residents and physician assistants were busy with other patients and tasks. A nurse practitioner may have been helpful to fill these gaps. Also, because nursing education is grounded in a holistic approach at every level, their input may provide a different perspective to the care approach and decision-making that may improve patient-provider relations and patient outcomes. Again, as a travel nurse, I do not have much insight into organizational changes or initiatives because of the limited amount of time I spend at each facility, however, at the current facility I work at in California I can honestly say that I have not heard of any initiatives to alleviate this issue during huddles or unit meetings. I cannot recall interacting with a nurse practitioner at this facility at all. From what I have heard from staff members, this Kaiser facility does not utilize nurse practitioners at all or very rarely. This may be a consequence of California state law and/or specific Kaiser policies in this region. This facility could greatly benefit from utilizing nurse practitioners from my experience as I have had the pleasure of working with APRNs in my home state of Pennsylvania; they serve as an invaluable resource and bedside nurses and physicians alike relied on their expertise greatly. As Poghosyan et al. (2018) reports, many physicians believe that nurse practitioners are competent members of the care team that can expand the capacities of health care practices and help meet the increased demand for quality patient care.


National Healthcare Issue/Stressor – The High Cost of Health Care

Healthcare expense in the United States is among the highest in the world compared to other developed nations. The US spent 4.3 trillion dollars on healthcare in 2021, or around $12,900 per person, according to Peter G. Peterson Foundation (2023), compared to other first-world countries that only charge around half as much for healthcare per person. Healthcare expenses have risen over the past several decades relative to the size of the economy, from 5% of GDP in 1960 to 18% in 2021 (Peter G. Peterson Foundation, 2023). The rising aging population and healthcare costs are the two most significant drivers. The proportion of Americans aged 65 and older has increased considerably (Broome & Marshall, 2021). Americans over 65 spend more on healthcare than any other age group because of age-acquired illnesses. The cost of healthcare services frequently increases more quickly than the cost of other goods and services. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for medical care has increased by 3.4 percent annually.
The introduction of cutting-edge, innovative healthcare technology that results in better but more expensive services and products; organizational waste in the insurer and provider payment systems may be brought on by the complexity of the American healthcare system; and hospital mergers may bring about a lack of competition and a monopoly that attracts high prices are a few additional potential causes for the rise in healthcare costs (Peter G. Peterson Foundation, 2023). One-fourth of people report delaying or skipping care due to cost, making costs a significant barrier to access. High healthcare costs sometimes prevent people from getting essential care or finishing their medications. They have missed doses, cut pills in half, or not finished prescriptions in the last year, with more significant percentages among those with lower incomes (Montero et al., 2022).

Impact on Work Setting

The hospital had noted a tendency in some patients who could not pay for care when they first sought medical attention and later learned they had severe illnesses due to delaying or skipping medical visits for routine checkups, therapy, or rehabilitation following surgery or a treatment, aftercare, or an inpatient stay. As a result, of the high cost of medical treatment, patients’ health deteriorated, and undiagnosed or untreated medical conditions developed worsening symptoms, necessitating additional, more expensive therapies that would only worsen the initial problem causing these patients to be admitted to the hospital (Experian Health, 2022). There are more patients with serious issues who, if appropriately managed as outpatients, may have avoided admissions to emergency room (ER) services for medication-related diseases that escalated because they missed doctor appointments. It often results in a needless ER admission, which raises medical expenses since ER treatments are generally expensive (Rakshit et al., 2023). As a result of unpaid medical bills, calls to patients to inform them about outstanding debts for at least 120 days before pursuing extreme steps have increased. Invoices are subsequently forwarded to a collection agency when all available payment alternatives have been offered to the patients and have yet to be taken advantage of have been seen. Patients with medical debt hospitalized for stress and high blood pressure are becoming more common in this hospital (Rakshit et al., 2023). Due to the high cost, it is found that some patients are thinking about switching providers and moving to a location with lower costs. When patients fail to appear for their appointments, it jeopardizes the quality of medical services. It affects resource efficiency, resulting in a loss of projected income in services, interfering with medical processes, and wasting time and resources.

Social Determinant

The effects of high healthcare costs are felt most acutely by those without insurance, those of color, and those with lower or no incomes who lack healthcare resources to obtain health insurance or pay for expensive procedures and prescription drugs. Some people claim that they cannot afford specific forms of therapy and delay or skip receiving medical care due to the cost (Montero et al., 2022). Individuals who reside in rural areas, belong to specific racial and ethnic groups, are physically disabled, or are members of specific communities are more likely to struggle financially to pay for expensive healthcare. Institutional racism and discrimination lead to disparities in social and economic opportunities and resources. The resources necessary to ensure a high quality of life, such as healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid, are typically inaccessible to those in disadvantaged areas. Unfulfilled social needs, environmental factors, and barriers to seeking medical care, such as high expenses, all contribute to worse health outcomes. Poverty can limit access to educational and career opportunities and widen the wealth gap, creating a vicious cycle of poverty and the inability to pay for adequate healthcare. The risk that an individual would experience poverty as an adult rises due to childhood poverty, which feeds poor generational cycles (H HS, n.d.). People without access to quality education throughout their lives are more likely to find themselves in difficult financial situations, making it more challenging to afford quality healthcare. The likelihood of finding higher-paying occupations with fewer safety dangers increases with education. More educated people ultimately have more significant financial resources to pay for and receive high-quality healthcare.

Health System Work Setting Response

Being a non-profit hospital, the healthcare system where I work provides treatment for those in need, regardless of their financial situation or state of health. No matter what medical challenges a patient may encounter, they can obtain the best care possible because of their financial support and other measures they have put in place to help pay for medical bills. The hospital’s billing office telephone number allows patients with financial difficulties to call and discuss options like a payment plan or financial aid. These services for financial support consist of fair and standardized billing and collection procedures, such as Charity Care, financial aid policies, and a standardized application procedure. Once a patient is eligible, their Charity Care programs are utilized to pay all or a portion of the hospital charge. There is also a payment arrangement with zero interest and extended payment plan choices for patients who owe medical bills to pay off their debt affordably. This hospital provides a minimum monthly payment of $25 for 36 months. This enables people with high medical costs to stay compliant with their medical care and has a positive societal impact (Parkview Health, n.d.). This hospital prevents surprise medical expenditures by providing patients with realistic pricing projections. Clear and precise estimates are provided to equip patients better to arrange their finances and make treatment decisions. The estimates are provided to patients through an easy-to-use self-service website (Parkview Health, n.d.). Despite budgetary limitations, this hospital also provides emergency care. It is one of 12 grant recipients countrywide who must get money to develop its Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) clinic program, with aims to treat drug addiction disorders, notably opioid misuse disorder, by offering free medicine, counseling, and behavior therapy to patients who would not otherwise be able to pay for their prescription medications (Parkview Health, n.d.). Employee discount offers a variety of healthcare goods and services to its employees and beneficiaries. Also, this hospital employs social workers and medical professionals who inform patients of outside resources they might use for assistance. With case management, patients may set up Medicare and Medicaid programs. They have pharmacy discount cards available and provide information about healthcare facilities like Matthew 25 Health and Care, a gospel-inspired medical facility. They offer high-quality medical and psychiatric services free of cost to low-income, uninsured adults, bringing joy to the most vulnerable in the neighborhood by treating them with kindness and dignity despite their socioeconomic status or religious views (Matthew 25 Health and Care, n.d.).


Healthcare Issue/Stressor-Nursing Shortages and Quality of Care

            Every day, nurses are expected to do their job and do it to the best of their ability. I currently work in a clinic setting, and we are adding more and more clinics. Each nurse has clinics they are specifically assigned to. But what happens when they keep adding more and more, and we only are allowed a certain number of employees? Well, I can tell you that we will have to work those clinics and care for those patients. The biggest question that comes to mind, though with that, is how thin can staff be stretched? We run into issues such as insufficient time to room patients and get a full health history appropriately. So then, what are we missing that we should be aware of. That, for example, leads to quality-of-care issues. As a patient, I know I’m not the only critical patient that day of my visit, but I know I’d like to feel like they are dedicated enough to learn and know my whole story, problems, etc., to develop a plan of care. The example listed above is only one example of how nurses are shorted and overworked many times, and in turn it lacks on the patient care end and providing quality care simply because they do not have the time.

Many reasons have caused staff shortages, but today, one can think that the COVID-19 pandemic did not help the situation. Any nurse that worked through it probably wanted to run away from it. Most healthcare entities had difficulty staffing their facilities during the pandemic, especially in rural communities. Nurses being short staffed causes increased mortality rates, length of stays and hospital readmissions, patient safety problems, errors, lack of quality of care, and wait times (Norwich University Online, 2020). The nursing field continues to experience exhaustion and burnout. The nursing turnover nationally ranges from 8.8-37%  (Haddad et al., 2022).

Social Determinants

            Social determinants of healthcare are the patient’s financial situation, their level of education, employment status, work and home conditions, ability to get food, age-appropriate development, social situation, and affordability and accessibility to quality of care (World Health Organization, 2018). When speaking of quality care, all the social determinants of care can be quality factors. Specifically in our clinic, financials are a bit problem, especially when it comes to getting medications that are prescribed. Thinking back to a specific example of a patient not being able to afford simple over the counter medications for a colonoscopy. We then had to send in the MiraLAX and Bisacodyl through insurance because they could not pay for them through food stamps. Many of the patients with low socio-economic status’ do not receive the preventative care they need until major health problems arise, and that is when we see them more in the clinic in one or more department. This is, in turn increases patient loads because of the many appointments that they have in the clinic or even some patients we have come in for daily or even twice daily antibiotic infusions, which we must work our other patients around. Again, going back to only so many staff nurses, being shorthanded, affecting the quality of care, and needing time to care for each patient appropriately.

Response

            Our clinic setting has taken a team approach in this staffing issues. We stay central to our clinics to maintain continuum of care, a positive aspect of quality of care. We have had to learn new clinics to ensure their patient load is appropriately cared for. In our downtime, we get into the inbox and promptly respond to patient calls, refills, and results notes. Hopefully, we will also add a specific nurse that can take care of prior authorizations, med refills, result notes, patient notification, etc,. That way the rest of the nurses can focus on patient care. We also have a manager that genuinely cares about quality care and how the clinic runs. She also assists in getting PRN help when needed as well. Many aspects make up quality patient care, and just because we are short staffed and they are adding more and more clinics does not mean that we cannot provide the best care around. I would compare our approach to the core competencies of teamwork, values, responsibility, knowing our clear roles, and communicating with one another (Broome & Marshall, 2021).


National Healthcare Issue/Stressor

The national healthcare issue/stressor I have chosen is COVID-19 and personal protective equipment. Any change in a work setting comes with pushback. In healthcare, change is inevitable and learning how to cope with change while delivering effective care is necessary for healthcare professionals (Broome & Marshall, 2021). COVID-19 was a change that was unexpected and led to massive changes in a short amount of time. Hospitals and healthcare facilities were not prepared for a pandemic and PPE was in high demand. COVID-19 caused stress for healthcare workers due to lack of resources, unsafe working conditions, long working hours, stress of exposure, and PPE that was uncomfortable and hard to work with (Evcili & Demirel, 2022).

Impact on Work Setting

I currently work in a peri-op setting and before COVID we were only required to wear PPE when the patient had a known respiratory illness or if was required due to a different isolation reason such as C-Diff. Due to COVID, we now always wear masks in pre-op and PACU. When COVID was at its peak, we had to always wear N95s and protective eyewear. Our healthcare system still requires staff and patients to wear a mask. Many people have pushed back and have left to other systems in the state who do not require staff to wear masks.

Social Determinants

Social determinants that have been affected due to COVID and PPE are working conditions and medical care. COVID has made working conditions stressful for healthcare workers and being in PPE 12 plus hours a day is very uncomfortable. PPE and COVID at its peak, affected the care patients received because nurses had to learn how to reprioritize their work and provide tasks for many patients at a time. COVID-19 has led to missed nursing care and leads to longer lengths of stay for patients and higher rates of readmission (Khrais et al., 2023).

Health System Work Setting Response

COVID has affected all healthcare workers in some way. Healthcare is still recovering from it. There has been recent talk in my healthcare system that masks will not be required anymore due to pushback from patients/staff. Our organization currently does not require them in a non-clinical setting. I will be interested to read if other healthcare systems still require them in other states from all of you!


Staff Shortage in Long-Term Care Facilities

The national issue of nursing and primary care provider shortages constantly impacts work in my healthcare settings of long-term care and rehabilitation facility within the ProMedica healthcare organization. Ricketts and Fraher (2013) noted that the nursing shortages pattern resembles a sinewave prompting policy development that “stimulates rapid growth leading to surpluses” (p. 1876). Periera and Bowers (2021) confirmed that “the nursing supply between 2014 and 2030 is expected to exceed demand, with a projected surplus of 293,800 RNs by 2030” (p. 83). Despite these projections, the skilled nursing facility (SNF) where I work constantly experiences workforce shortages in nursing assistants, nurses, and primary care providers. The nurse-patient ratio of one-to-thirty instead of one-to-twenty became the new normal, inevitably resulting in diminished quality of patient care, patient dissatisfaction, and staff burnout. The continuous effort of Human Resources to hire new employees does not have much effect on adequate staffing either due to high turnover rates. According to Periera and Bowers (2021), “turnover of nurses within healthcare organizations is common, with 20% of nurses leaving their job within the first year of employment” (p. 84). Therefore, to maintain sufficient staffing and uninterrupted work of the facility, reorganizational strategies should be implemented beyond simply hiring new employees.

According to Walden University (2018), the Triple Aim of healthcare, which is increasing access to healthcare, improving clinical outcomes, and reducing the cost of healthcare delivery, was converted to Quadruple Aim with added focus on environmental effects that include work life and provider experience improvement (Walden University, 2018, 1:15; Periera & Bowers, 2021, p. 69). Hence, one of the reorganizational strategies and health system work setting response to the healthcare issue of staff shortages would be enhancing employees’ well-being and experience. Jacobs et al. (2018) noted that “making well-being an organizational strategy could be a way to improve employees’ lives while achieving organizational outcomes” (p. 232). The authors overviewed Anne Arundel Medical Center’s approach to enhancing employees’ well-being, including educational opportunities, career development, social, financial, and physical expansion, and assuring community support (pp. 236-237). ProMedica healthcare organization also provides diverse programs to support employees in their daily work life, particularly during hardship times. Thus, ProMedica launched Employee Assistance Program (EAP) that offers mental health counseling, stress management, substance abuse consultation, solution support, and is open for employees 24 hours via telehealth, phone, or in-person counseling (ProMedica, 2023). Additionally, ProMedica ensures employees’ wellness via 24/7 telehealth support for adverse health conditions, unemployment protection, and family/parental support.

Another reorganizational strategy and health system work setting response to staff shortages would be engaging the nurse practitioners (NP) workforce to support primary care providers. Norful et al. (2018) noted that one of the reorganizational models “includes having more than one primary care professional comanaging the same patient and sharing the workload responsibilities or care management tasks” (p. 250). The authors noted, however, that current legislation and organizational policy restrict nurse practitioners’ authority leading to a “physician-led hierarchical infrastructure in which the physician has the final decision-making authority” (p. 252). The authors further collaborated that perceived NP lack of authority can be mitigated by NP-physician shared philosophy of care, mutual respect and trust, and effective communication, which, in turn, will be beneficial “to meet demand of patient care” and alleviate “individual provider workload” (p. 253). Lovink et al. (2017) confirmed that the collaborative work model of NPs and physicians and even the substitution of elderly care physicians (ECPs) by NPs, physician assistants (PA), or registered nurses (RN) is possible if NPs, PAs, and RNs are supported by management and physicians, “collaborating with the ECP based on trust, [and] sharing the same views with the ECP on good resident care” (p. 9). The SNF where I work is at the beginning of adopting this model. With only four primary care physicians for a 200-bed facility, organizational management attempts to assign certain patients to third-party organization nurse practitioners who work discordantly with the facility’s permanent physicians and nursing staff. More efforts should be made to advance the education of already employed RNs to NPs and promote collaborative work with primary care physicians in the facility.

Finally, working synergistically with educational underprices and providing a launching base for new nursing assistances and nurses can serve as an additional reorganizational strategy and health system work setting response to the healthcare issue of staff shortages. According to Jean (2022), such innovative approaches as “training new technologies, […] providing a ‘flexible workforce,’ [ensuring] personalized educational opportunities, […] or providing tailored educational opportunities” are effective ways to address healthcare personnel shortages (Using Innovation to Address the Nursing Shortage section). The author pointed out that the nurse residency programs effectively combine learning opportunities for nurse novices and fill in the gap of nursing staff shortage (Using Innovation to Address the Nursing Shortage section). For example, the SNF where I work effectively uses its settings as an educational platform to prepare nurses and nursing assistances. Many students who graduated from local community colleges decide to apply for a job and continue working in an already familiar environment.

Therefore, searching for working model reorganizational strategies, such as enhancing workforce well-being, promoting a collaborative approach of NPs, RNs, and physicians to centered patient care, and enhancing educational opportunities in both ways offering tuition reimbursement programs and serving as an educational practice site, is an effective way to recruit new healthcare team members and retain the already existing workforce.


The challenge of training nurses has been a national healthcare issue in the healthcare industry. Having well-trained nurses is essential to ensuring patients’ highest quality of care. It contributes to ensuring that nurses have the information and abilities needed to effectively carry out their tasks and care for patients in line with accepted standards of practice. Efficient and effective clinical training for nurses is required to ensure that healthcare is provided efficiently (Will et al., 2019). Although the lack of enough skills for nurses is particularly pertinent in the rapidly changing technology environment and increasing complexity of care delivery, this issue must be addressed (Ricketts et al., 2013). This issue can potentially impact my work setting as it could lead to making mistakes in delivering medical care, resulting in poor patient outcomes, incorrect diagnoses, incorrect medications, or even missed symptoms that can have serious health consequences.

In my work setting, we have responded to this issue in several ways. First, our organization has provided ongoing training and workshops for nurses. This training focuses on the role of nurses and the importance of collaboration and communication. We have also implemented an electronic health record (EHR) system to help streamline the workflow and reduce the burden on nurses. The (EHR) system has improved the quality of care, lowered costs, and improved productivity by making care more efficient and effective (Negro-Calduch et al., 2021). Finally, we have implemented several initiatives to increase nurses’ satisfaction, such as flexible scheduling, mentoring programs, and educational opportunities. In conclusion, this challenge of training nurses must include regular workshops and conferences, implementing an EHR system, and improving nurses’ satisfaction. Our firm is working to guarantee that healthcare is delivered effectively and efficiently through these ways.


Review of Current Healthcare Issues

             Nurses make up the largest section of healthcare professionals and according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the need for nurses is expected to grow from 2020-2030 (Haddad et al., 2022). Possible causes of the current nursing shortage include, lack of educators and high turnover rate. With the aging of the baby boomer generation, there will be an increase need of care for the elderly, as their health progresses. Another factor that lead to our current nursing shortage is the Covid-19 virus, this virus increased the demands for nurses and the volume of patients being seen (Turale & Nantsupawat, 2021). The purpose of this discussion post is to discuss the national nursing shortage and how it affects my workplace.

Nursing Shortage Impact on Emergency Department

             In the emergency department we see critically ill patients every day, and it is our job to triage and appropriately place the patient where they need to go. This can be challenging when there is an increase in volume of patients in the department and a shortage of nurses to care for them. Nursing shortages in the emergency room increase the door to discharge length of stay and increase the number of patients that leave before being seen (Ramsey et al., 2018). Some social determinants affecting the nursing shortage are stress from increased workload, and negative effects on mental health. Another determinant is the Covid-19 virus and nurses fear of infection and possibly death (Turale & Nantsupawat, 2021).

Workplace Response to Nursing Shortage

             My workplace has made many efforts to increase nurse retention, hire more nurses, and decrease nurse workload. My workplace is offering nurses a ten thousand dollar sign on bonus in exchange the nurse has to stay at my organization for two years. The first half of the bonus is given after their first ninety days and the other half after one year. For their current employees they are giving them yearly raises, annual incentive bonuses, and a bonus for extra shifts worked. To help decrease the nurses work load the emergency department has hired medics to help with tasks like, IV insertion and triage. Lastly, to eliminate unsafe nurse to patient ratios, they hired travel nurses to fill in holes in the schedule. In conclusion, with my employer taking these steps to improve the nursing shortage, we have already seen an improvement in the department.


The national healthcare issue and stressor I selected for analysis is the nursing shortage. When we dissect the healthcare team in the hospital setting, the majority of these professionals are nurses, who play a crucial role in healthcare. Since the pandemic hit in 2020, the nursing shortage has been growing and continues to be a huge concern. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that more than 275,000 additional nurses are needed from 2020 to 2030 (Haddad et al., 2022).

I currently work in the emergency department of a small rural hospital and the nursing shortage has affected us tremendously. We have a total of 22 beds which includes two code/trauma/treatment rooms. One of these rooms is designated for the providers, and two are for storage. So, we technically have 17 rooms for patients in total. As of last August, our MOSU unit closed due to the nursing shortage, so the ER also rooms observation and admitted patients. The staffing for our shifts is one charge nurse, two nurses, one provider, and three days a week one HUC. To give a better idea of how stressful this can be I will provide an example. Last week we had a total of nine admits which left us with eight beds total for ER patients. Keep in mind, this means each nurse has three holds and must also take care of the patients that come into the ER.

With that being said, we have recently been informed that all but two of our doctors will be leaving. The number of patients the providers had to see was already high and the fact that we have to house the holds makes it even worse. These providers are stressed out and could have had some relief with a midlevel provider.  The number of NPs and PAs is growing rapidly, in part because of shorter training times for such providers as compared with physicians and fewer institutional constraints on expanding educational capacity (Auerbach et al., 2018). The nurses in the emergency department are burned out and really need more help too. You would think the hospital would offer some kind of incentive for working under these conditions, but they don’t.  Cecilia K. Wooden from the Walden University (2015) video states that velocity and vitality are important aspects of balancing work-life balance. She states that the workload we encounter causes stress, and we need to balance that with utilizing employee wellness programs to avoid burnout.

Social determinants that affect this healthcare issue are nursing burnout, location, and the low pay offered at this hospital. In this hospital, ER nurses are also practicing as floor nurses and most have never done that which can be stressful and pose a risk for the patient. This hospital is also over an hour away from the city and most people don’t want to make the drive there. The company needs to increase the pay to make up for the drive these nurses would have to make, and they don’t. As stated above, they also don’t have any kind of employee incentive programs for anything. Nursing burnout is very high here due to all of this. According to Jacobs et al., 2018 “Engaged employees who feel cared for by their employer through initiatives like our WellBeing programs positively influence an organization’s performance”.

The admin and nursing director haven’t done much to try and help alleviate these problems. The most they have done is place an ad online to their facebook page to advertise job openings. They haven’t even offered anything to the providers that are leaving. The quadruple-aim study includes provider satisfaction, and this hospital does not follow this aim at all.  In an effort to address these aims, healthcare leaders must identify new priorities not only for healthcare delivery but to improve the work life of the members of the healthcare team (Broom & Marshall, 2021).


Healthcare Issue/Stressor and Impact on Work Setting

Lack of access to healthcare has always been an issue healthcare organizations have been combatting for years. Before the pandemic, there was a multitude of social determinants that created barriers to access to health care. The pandemic, however, was clearly the most significant determinant that destroyed access to healthcare exponentially compared to the determinants that were already an issue previously. This impacted the work setting because there was an increased demand for emergency services since many patients needed help to follow up with primary care providers or specialists. My hospital stopped elective procedures from having rooms for critical patients with life-or-death necessities. Staffing shortages became an issue, and we began to notice decreased patient and worker satisfaction due to higher nurse-to-patient ratios and increasing demand for nurses and doctors. Despite the significant increase in demand for medical services, the supply of medical professionals is not growing fast enough to keep up with the demand. Physicians need to outsource their work, new technologies are being developed and more duties are falling on APRNs and clinicians that are not physicians (Auerbach et al., 2018, p.2358-2360).

Social Determinants Affecting this Healthcare Issue

Covid-19 was the primary determinant preventing access to healthcare, and facilities had to pivot with their technology to remain current and competitive. However, before covid-19, there were other determinants facilities were already taking actions to reorganize processes to improve outreach and services to the sickest patients. . Income and poverty restricted access to those individuals who were struggling to afford services or medication and could also limit access to transportation to healthcare facilities. Low education levels affected access due to illiteracy which sometimes delayed seeking healthcare services until problems progressed. Location and proximity to services hamper access and have always been an issue if patients travel 1-2 hours to see their providers. As you can see, the Roe vs. Wade situation currently limits access to reproductive services for women. There have always been social determinants that need to be combatted to improve access for our population with a focus on minority groups and the underserved long before covid-19 turned off all the lights. Systems need to be altered at times which sometimes means certain tasks need to be outsourced and loosely controlled or remain in house and tightly controlled by the faculty. Creativity and flexibility in new processes is key to be able to adapt effectively (Pittman & Scully-Russ, 2016, p. 2-3).

How Work Setting has Responded to this Healthcare Issue

In combatting these social determinants leadership needs to get creative and evolve with the times to ensure their business will continue to grow through the difficult times. New systems need to be developed to meet ever changing needs of the community in challenging times of change (Broome & Marshall, 2021, p. 35-36). My facility has increased access to telehealth services after discharge to monitor patients and ensure they remain proactive in their mental health and stay engaged in their care. Low-cost or free services are sometimes granted to low-income individuals and families who have difficulty paying for assistance but have critical needs for access to remaining focused and stable in the community. Telehealth has become the forefront of the next generation of healthcare, improving access to millions of people living in rural areas or hours away from the nearest provider.


Nursing Shortage

National healthcare issues directly affect how a healthcare organization functions. One national healthcare issue directly impacting the healthcare organization where I work is nursing shortages. Nurses are a vital part of healthcare. From 2020 to 2021, the supply of registered nurses (RNs) decreased by more than 100,000, creating an additional strain on an already suffering healthcare system following the COVID-19 pandemic. Factors that contribute to the nursing shortages are nurse burnout, an aging workforce reaching retirement age, family obligations, a lack of nursing educators, and an aging population with chronic diseases. Nurse shortages affect direct patient care by creating high nurse-to-patient ratios, thus leading to increased medication errors, infection rates, higher morbidity and mortality rates, and increased nurse burnout. Also, nurse shortages affect direct patient care by limiting the number of hospital beds available to care for patients. A healthcare organization needs a nurse to care for its patients. The nursing shortage will leave hospitals with empty rooms due to limited nursing staff available. This causes hospitals to diverge patients to other hospitals and can decrease funding and reimbursements (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, n.d.; Broome & Marshall, 2021; Buerhaus, 2021; Jones & Spiva, 2023).

Impact of Nursing Shortage

The healthcare issue of the nursing shortage directly impacts my workplace healthcare organization by decreasing the beds available in the emergency department. Currently, I work in a rural healthcare organization. The closest level-one trauma center is over one hour, with limited ambulance services available. My healthcare organization is a critical access point for this rural area. The nursing shortages have decreased half the emergency department’s nursing staff, causing the healthcare organization to close over half the number of beds available. Thus, causing a delay in patient care and limiting the services available to the community (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, n.d.).

Social Determinants of Health

The social determinants of health most affected by the healthcare issue of nursing shortage are Health Care Access and Quality. The limited number of nurses available to care for patients and the financial strain that the nursing shortages had applied to healthcare organizations have decreased patient access to healthcare, especially in rural and low-income areas. Also, nursing shortages have affected the quality of patient care by causing higher nurse-to-patient ratios, thus leading to increased medication errors, infection rates, and morbidity and mortality rates (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, n.d.; Broome & Marshall, 2021; Buerhaus, 2021).

Responding to the Nursing Shortage

My healthcare organization has yet to succeed in responding to the nursing shortage. The only action they had implemented was a sign-on bonus with a one-year contract. However, their pay does not compete with other larger healthcare organizations in the surrounding areas. The administration is currently discussing and holding meetings with nursing staff and providers to form an action plan to retain and recruit nurses.


The national healthcare stressor I’ve selected is the growing nursing shortage. I think it’s safe to say that we all feel the weight of this stressor daily in our working lives. Many facilities, including my own, are constantly working short-staffed. We have an aging population with increasing complexities in healthcare needs and a decreasing supply of current and future nurses (Morris, 2022). In my state of Virginia, there’s only 10-12 nurses per 1,000 residents (Nurse Journal, 2020). This is dangerous for our patients and for us as nurses. Patients may not receive adequate care and nurses are at risk of losing their licenses due to unsafe practices and high ratios.

The main social determinant affecting this issue is geographic location. Many nurses are moving to hiring paying areas, leaving lower paying areas without adequate staff. Thus, leading to the rise in reliance on travel nurses and per diem staff. Contract hires are wonderful resources to use in times of need, however, it is so important to have a strong core staff to keep units up and running efficiently.

My facility has tried to combat this by hiring new graduates to practice in high levels of care and by taking advantage of travel and per diem employees. The practice of using travel and per diem employees is expected to rise to combat the nursing shortage overall (Green, 2023). New graduates can do well in higher levels of care IF they have adequate orientation. Unfortunately, due to the nursing shortage, many new graduates are being pressured to come off of orientation early. This can be detrimental to both the nurse and their patients. I would like to see my facility offer incentives for new hires and for current staff, as this is something that is currently lacking.


War on Women’s Health:

On June 24, 2022, Rowe v. Wade was overturned by the Supreme Court, leaving it up to each state to decide whether the practice of abortions would be legal or not in their condition. This impacted our healthcare system, especially regarding women’s health, nationwide.

Restrictive abortion regulations in states can limit access to safe and legal abortion services. This can increase unsafe abortions, resulting in serious health complications and even death. Abortion regulations can also impact reproductive health outcomes, including unintended pregnancies, maternal mortality, and morbidity. This makes healthcare providers uneasy when it comes to providing care for these patients without being put at risk for legal and regulatory barriers to providing abortion services, which can limit their ability to provide the full range of reproductive healthcare services (Harris, 2022).

In the state of Ohio, which is the state I reside and practice as a Registered Nurse, abortion laws are more strict. According to (Field et al., 2022), “Ohio abortion regulations limit ob-gyns’ ability to provide comprehensive reproductive health care, creating ethical dilemmas for these physicians as they attempt to care for their patients. As Ohio’s abortion laws increase in number and restrictiveness, they further undermine obstetric and gynecologic ethical practice guidelines.” This can also impact the ability of healthcare providers to provide evidence-based care, which can impact health outcomes. The healthcare organization where I currently work often has to refer patients to other clinics in states where access to safe abortions is available to them when they need one.

Abortion regulations can also impact social determinants of health, such as access to education and employment opportunities, and can perpetuate social and economic inequalities (Carroll, 2022). These regulations can disproportionately affect low-income women, women of color, and those living in rural areas, who may have limited access to healthcare services and may be more vulnerable to the negative impacts of restrictive abortion policies (Redd et al., 2022). Women unable to obtain abortions may be forced to continue pregnancies unprepared, impacting their ability to work, attend school, and care for their families.


How can the health profession address the needs of the many where there are only a few? The healthcare profession has faced a multitude of factors keeping up with the demand of the census. Ranging from meeting the population’s medical needs in rural areas or providing primary care to the overall census due to the shortage of physicians. Physician shortage may be due to extended training time vs. acute need for primary care and a lack of medical school capacity. In addition, the limited accredited residency position(Auerbach et al., 2018). In addition, the aging population of physicians shows that within the next decade, more than 2 out of every five practicing physicians will be over 65(Jubbal, 2022). The Association of American Medical Colleges projects the physician population will only increase by 0.5%-1% per year between 2016 and 2030(Auerbach et al., 2018, para. 2). However, researchers believe in offsetting the slow growth of the physician population, the number of physician assistants and nurse practitioners will continue to sour in development by 6.8% and 4.3% annually. Therefore, Nps and PAs contribute more than two-thirds (67.3%) of all practitioners between 2016 and 2030(Auerbach et al., 2018, para. 6).

Nurse practitioners are equipped with the education and capability to fulfill the gap between the need for clinicians and providing high-quality cost-affected care to the population in need. Some of the duties of a nurse practitioner are to assess and perform physical examinations, order and analyze cost-efficient diagnostic tests, consult fellow health professionals to aid in the treatment of the patient, prescribe the appropriate medications, and follow up on the individual’s status to reduce readmission and improve the patient outcome.

NPs consistently demonstrate similar or better outcomes than their physician colleagues across various health indicators(Buerhaus et al., 2015). However, “the increasing number of Nps alone will not address the deficiencies in primary care delivery because many policy and practice setting barriers affect Nps’ ability to offer services at the full range of their educational preparation and competencies” (Broone & Marshall, 2021, p. 77). Currently, 28 states out of 50 have limitations on the scope of practice for nurse practitioners mandating signatures for care to be signed by physicians.

Currently, I reside in Virginia. Virginia has a limited scope of practice for nurse practitioners. However, nurse practitioners and physicians provide comanagement upon treatment to patients, but the physicians have the final say in the direction of care management. I like this format from a new nurse practitioner aspect, but after becoming comfortable in my role. I want more autonomy.


Nursing shortages and staffing concerns have been and continue to be major issues in healthcare. There are myriad reasons for staffing shortages in the nursing field. The aging workforce is seeing many more nurses retire than become new nurses. The nurses that remain want more time with their families. An increase in violence in the workplace, job dissatisfaction, and burnout are also some of the factors that lead to the lack of a nursing force worldwide (Haddad et al., 2022). One study suggests that by 2035 there will be a shortage of over twelve million nurses (Marć et al., 2018). More nurses are working in non-hospital settings such as Home Care, community health, and outpatient settings (Palumbo et al., 2017). This shift in locations of medical care is one of the contributing factors in the decline of hospital staff.

Nursing shortages are affecting all nursing fields, even the areas where the above study indicated the shift is helping. In my particular home care agency, we are currently looking for nursing staff for patient care. Despite offering more than the national average salary (Marć et al., 2018) we are unable to find qualified candidates. Due to the lack of appropriately qualified applicants, we are forced to make decisions between overextending our staff or curtailing patient interactions. Our agency has attempted to mitigate the stressors involved with nursing by implementing set hours of operation, focusing on employee wellbeing, increased training, and placing our nurses in the community where they live (Jacobs et al., 2018).

As I said earlier, there are many factors that play into the nursing shortage. Some of the determinants are a lack of educators to teach nurses, the regionality of the field, nurses retiring, more people needing care as the population ages, and an uptick in violence against healthcare workers (Haddad et al., 2022).


Nurses are critical to the makeup of healthcare. As times continue to change the profession of nursing continues to face shortages as a result of a lack of education, an increasingly high turnover rate, and an unequal workforce distribution. Nurse burn out rates are increasing tremendously. Many times, nurses are finding that once they start their profession in healthcare, they then decide the career is not for them. The national average rates in the United States for turnover have increased from 8.8% to 37.0% (Haddad, et al., 2022).

I work as a labor and delivery nurse in a small community hospital. It is incredibly evident within my hospital; nursing burn out is real. Being that I work in a small hospital, it seems that more and more hats get added to our heads. Overtime, this creates hardships for nurses. Nurses feel they cannot care for the patient the way the patient should be cared for because of all the extra jobs being added to their already overflowing plate.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are what impacts individuals’ health and well-being. Included within SDOH are economic stability, good quality and access to education, access to quality healthcare, access to opportunity of physical activity and nutritious foods, and safe housing (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, n.d.).

The social determinants that most affect this health issue would be the determinants of physical and mental health. Healthcare professionals experience emotional exhaustion and a lack of confidence when physical and mental health is at stake. Addressing these social determinants of health can help by combating the healthcare burnout issue. (Heath, 2019).

My hospital has recently implemented sign on bonuses and retention bonuses to help with nursing burnout and nursing shortages amongst the hospital. The has helped because those who decided to sign must commit to a two-year contract. The hospital also worked to put together a serenity room for staff to use. These things have helped, but there is still a lot of other changes that need to be made in order to assist with this healthcare issue.


Burnout and work-related stress

One national healthcare issue/stressor affecting my work setting is the nursing shortage, lack of supporting staff, and sudden changes that have led to burnout and work-related stress. Nurse burnout impacts patient healthcare outcomes and contributes to a poor work environment (Lajiness, 2022). I work at a military medical center, and most of the time, changes come down the pipe without the opinions of the staff involved. In 2020, when covid pandemic hit the world and affected the healthcare system, my ward was changed to be the designated covid unit. The ward was a locked unit, with no warnings and no training on the expectations of things to come. In 2022, when the war in Afghanistan was over, and the military base was closed, the injured Afghanis when brought to our hospital, and the unit was shot down again. Once more, we cared for patients who spoke no English, did not want women to touch them, and seemed hostile toward us. These two events created a lot of workplace-related stress and burnout. Leadership made all the decisions, and we had no say in whether we could support this mission. At the same time, most of the military staff were deployed to different states where the covid numbers were rising. So we were short-staffed and dealing with these changes. According to Hetzel-Riggin et al. (2020), one factor that affects the nursing shortage is an unfavorable and declining work environment which leads to job dissatisfaction. Nurses started looking for jobs in the outpatient environment where changes are predictable. According to Hetzel-Riggin et al. (2020), five different types of burnout symptoms can be observed: physical (such as sleep disturbances, headaches, and gastrointestinal problems), emotional (such as irritability, depression), behavioral (such as poor work performance, increased absenteeism), interpersonal (such as withdrawal from others), and attitudinal (such as callousness, dehumanization of clients/patients). One staff member retired, and two others left. Losing staff members with the skills set and experience is devastating and often leads to low-quality care and poor patient satisfaction.

Social Determinant

The social determinant mostly affecting this health issue is employee well-being. Jacobs et al. (2018) suggested that the work environment significantly impacts employee well-being, and employees with poor well-being were less engaged and more pessimistic about the workplace. The morale was very low amongst the staff. There was no trust in leadership, especially after we lost a staff member during the pandemic.

After our concerns were brought to the leadership and we had a unit meeting, the following changes were made;

  • Our ward was removed from the list for any sudden changes without conversing with the staff.
  • A quiet room with a massage chair was provided for us where we could go there to center ourselves.
  • The lunchroom always had healthy snacks and fruits.
  • Hospital-wide for civilians with at least one year with the federal government tuition assistance from $6000 to $8000 annually.
  • Staff is allowed to use the gym and swimming environment during working hours if staffing is appropriate.

There is still work to do, but employee satisfaction has improved for now, and we celebrate each other. Patient satisfaction has improved; our unit has won the daisy ward twice.


Health Insurance and Low-Income Population

One national healthcare issue that can affect family clinics is the lack of access to affordable healthcare services for low-income families. Many families who cannot afford private health insurance or out-of-pocket medical expenses rely on public healthcare programs like Medicaid and CHIP (Cha & Cohen, 2022). However, these programs may have limited coverage or may not cover certain services, leaving families with limited options for healthcare. This can strain family clinics, which often serve low-income populations and may be reimbursed at lower rates for Medicaid and other public insurance programs. Family clinics may need help providing the necessary care and services to these patients while balancing their financial needs.

The shortage of primary care physicians in certain areas can also affect family clinics, as they may need help to recruit and retain qualified healthcare providers. This can limit the availability of healthcare services for families in those areas and strain existing staff. Addressing these healthcare issues and improving access to affordable, quality care is crucial for supporting family clinics and ensuring all families have access to the care they need (Cha & Cohen, 2022).

Social Determinants

A lack of access to affordable healthcare services can affect several social determinants. To name a few,

  • Health outcomes: Lack of access to affordable healthcare services can lead to poor health outcomes, including increased rates of preventable diseases, chronic conditions, and premature death.
  • Economic stability: When individuals cannot access affordable healthcare services, they may face high medical bills, leading to financial instability and bankruptcy.
  • Education: Lack of access to affordable healthcare services can impact education, leading to increased absenteeism and decreased academic performance.
  • Employment: When individuals cannot access affordable healthcare services, they may miss work due to illness or injury, leading to decreased job productivity and loss of income.
  • Social and community context: Lack of access to affordable healthcare services can impact social and community context by leading to increased stress and decreased social support, which can negatively impact mental health.
  • Physical environment: Lack of access to affordable healthcare services can impact the physical environment by increasing exposure to environmental hazards and decreasing access to safe and healthy living conditions.
  • (Artiga & Hinton, 2018).

The lack of access to affordable healthcare services can significantly negatively impact individual health and social and economic well-being.

 

Affected Workplace

Limited access to healthcare for low-income individuals can affect family health clinics in several ways. Family health clinics that serve low-income populations may experience an increase in demand for services as individuals who lack access to other healthcare options seek care. This can put a strain on clinic resources, including staff and funding. Many clinics need financial stability because of providing care to low-income patients who are uninsured or underinsured. These patients may need help paying for services or may be covered by public insurance programs that reimburse at lower rates, resulting in financial challenges for the clinic. Not only does it affect the clinic, but limited access to healthcare in low-income communities can also lead to challenges in recruiting and retaining qualified healthcare providers. Family health clinics may struggle to attract providers due to lower salaries or lack of resources, making it difficult to provide consistent patient care. Lastly, when low-income individuals cannot access necessary healthcare services, it can lead to adverse health outcomes for individuals and families. Family health clinics may see patients with more advanced or chronic health conditions because of delayed care, which can be more difficult and expensive to treat.

Healthcare for low-income individuals can significantly impact family health clinics, affecting demand, financial stability, staffing, and health outcomes. It is essential to address healthcare disparities and improve access to care to support the health and well-being of families and communities.


The scope of healthcare delivery extends beyond disease treatment to include preventative care, routine checkups, and emergency care. Accessibility, shortages of medical professionals, antiquated equipment, and other problems all contribute to our country’s trouble in providing medical care to its citizens. Low quality of service and poor health outcomes, longer wait times to obtain care, harm to the institution’s image, a loss of patient trust, and a lack of accreditation are all direct results of healthcare delivery problems. (Broome & Marshall, 2021).

The organization has hired several APRNs to enhance service delivery in the face of physician shortages in primary care outpatient settings (APRNs). In Maryland, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) have the authority to conduct patient assessments, order and interpret diagnostic tests, make medical diagnoses, and launch and oversee treatment plans independently. They can also write prescriptions for drugs and treatments. These rules provide APRNs complete independence in the workplace and serve as a means of speeding up healthcare delivery. Healthcare delivery may be enhanced by resolving the problem of patient access to services. Integration of telemedicine services is one way to achieve this goal. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous healthcare facilities have used telemedicine, which has helped APRNs with triage services and improved high-risk patients’ access to regular treatment. Moreover, it has assisted persons with mental health conditions to maintain access to the necessary therapy services. Most importantly, it has allowed people with mental health issues to keep accessing the treatment they need via therapy (Smith et al., 2020).

Hence, the organization has hired nurse informaticists who have developed tools to improve healthcare delivery. According to Darvish et al. (2014), the new wave of technology has allowed new communication channels between doctors and their patients. Nurse informaticists utilize their knowledge to improve patients’ health, develop better healthcare systems, and make their jobs easier. A nurse informaticist develops software that facilitates electronic communication between nurses and other care team members, as well as between nurses and patients.


Across the United States, there are many different healthcare issues that can affect workplace settings. One workplace setting issue or stressor that many are facing is nursing shortages and burnout. There has always been a need for nurses and a shortage, however since Covid-19 has come into play, the shortage/burnout has become more of an issue. With Covid-19 nurses are expected to work more days, longer hours and patient/nurse ratio has gone up. There are not enough nursing students that are passing school and able to join the workforce. Another part of this is nurses are leaving the field all together due to the constant stressors. I work in the clinic, however we see a shortage in nursing in the clinical setting as well. Within my rural facility, nurses are being pushed to do the job of 2-3 nurses during clinic hours while also maintaining patient safety. “The nursing profession continues to face shortages due to a lack of potential educators, high turnover, and inequitable workforce distribution” (Haddad, et al, 2022).

With a nursing shortage/burnout there is no one social determinate that is affected. All of healthcare and patients are affected by nursing shortages. With that said, one social determinate that is affected are psych/mental health patients. This field is already a low retention rate area to work and since the pandemic this number has increased. According to the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 2019, “More than 75 percent of all U.S. counties have a shortage of any type of mental health worker and 96 percent of all counties have an unmet need for mental health prescribers.” Since this, it has continued to become more of an issue.

Within my facility, they have had multiple different attempts in helping with nursing burnout/shortages. One of which is large retention bonuses. These bonuses are given in payments across two years. Our current largest bonus is $25,000 spread across the 2 years and I believe to be twice a year. The longer the staff is with the more money they receive. While this is a nice thing to have, it is hard to still work through the hard times of working shorthanded. Floor nurses are being called in on their days off and end up working 4+ 12 hour days instead of working their scheduled 3 days. Another way the facility is attempting to keep nurses is offering tuition assistance to go back to school. Once staff sign up for tuition assistance, they are signed in for one year after graduation or they must pay all the money back. Nurses are encouraged more and more to continue on with their education and more facilities are wanting BSN nurses vs RN’s. My current facility has specific colleges they help pay for and according to Gerardi, Farmer & Hoffman, 2018, “…employment-focused partnerships between schools and health care facilities that provide students with practice experience, promote greater use of the BSN, and create employment opportunities.” This is a great way to encourage nurses to continue on in their education and retain employees as well.

The nursing shortage is real and it is here to stay. With the increase in demand for nurses, nurses being unable to pass schooling or finding qualified schools to attend, the nursing shortage is here to stay. Because of nursing shortages, nurses are being put in unsafe situations not only physically and mentally for them but also the patients in which they see/treat. “Patient outcomes are affected by staffing shortages. High nurse-to-patient ratios can lead to medication errors and higher morbidity and mortality rates” (Morris, 2022).


The national healthcare issue I chose to analyze was that of opioid addiction. This issue directly impacts the care of every single patient I see. Throughout the pandemic we started using more opioids to treat pain in our patients whether covid positive or just being seen for every day issues. Not only is dependency a huge issue with opioids but the number of overdoses has increased rapidly throughout the years.” More than 932,000 people have died since 1999 from a drug overdose.1 Nearly 75% of drug overdose deaths in 2020 involved an opioidLinks to an external site.”  (“Data overview,” 2022). This directly affects my work setting for many reasons, we must make sure that the proper medications are being given to patients, in proper doses and that we don’t overmedicate or use medications the patient may not truly need. Social determinants that are seen with opioid use include but are not limited to, a person’s income, a person’s housing stability or living situations in general, education regarding the use and addictive properties of opioids (“Social Determinants of Opioid Use among Patients in Rural Primary Care Settings,” n.d.). As far as addressing this crisis in the healthcare setting, more physicians are less likely to prescribe opioids for generalized pain and prefer to use a multimodality form of pain control. This includes using heat and ice, using creams to address pain, lidocaine patches, alternating Tylenol and ibuprofen. While there are certainly situations in which opioids are needed a deeper look is being taken before just prescribing and giving these medications especially with patients who have previous abuse histories.


In the field of Women’s Health, particularly Labor & Delivery, Antepartum and Postpartum care, the national standards of care and patient ratios are provided by AWHONN, Association of Women’s Health, Obstetrics and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN, 2022).  These standards of care, which include safe practice guidelines for patient to nurse ratio, are updated on a frequent basis.

Most large hospitals and teaching facilities adhere very well with patient:nurse ratios as set forth in the AWHONN guidelines, however there are exceptions when acuity and lack of staffing require the ratios to be tilted and the patient/nurse ratio to be overextended.  The Women’s Health Departments in smaller, more rural hospitals tend to not adhere to these guidelines, oftentimes causing very unsafe staffing ratios and place an overbearing load on nurses within their Women’s Health units.

Unit policies are created within each facility, sometimes policies are set forth by upper management that have never staffed the unit or understand how these guidelines are there to protect both patient and caregiver.  However on the other end of the spectrum there are hospitals that have policy makers that are all clinical staff.  The policies set forth by both nurse managers, attending physicians, and nursing staff are most often policies that are easy to follow, understand and provide the best patient care guidelines (ACOG, 2022).

Within each of the departments making up the Women’s Health Unit, both management and nurses often times participate in the leadership role and participate closely with policy and procedure.  Both in writing policy and preparing the procedural flow, nurses transition into a leadership role. According to Boome, “leadership is the ability to guide others, whether they are colleagues, peers, clients, or patients, toward desired outcomes” (Broome, 2021).  The role of the nurse is multifaceted, as with the policy and proceedure at different hospitals and facilities across the country,  As participants in the policy and procedure arena nurses take on the role as a transformational leader, where as nurse leaders one can influence others by changing the understanding of others, to what is important in the care of patients, family, staff (Broome, 2021).

Changing policy and procedure is a process. It is not just one thing, it consists of many characteristics and is an evolving process.  As nurse leaders we can participate in these changes, use our knowledge of national guidelines and governances to assist in exceptional results within our hospitals and facilities.

 


 

Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan

Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how including patient preferences and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.


Personal experience with patient impact

I recently worked with an African female patient experiencing catatonia. She was not overly responsive to medications, so our next action plan was to incorporate electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The patient could not make her own decisions, so we included her family members and husband as decision-makers. Her husband was informed of multiple options and provided education on ECT, ultimately deciding ECT was her best option, but due to cultural reasons, he was hesitant. She later had numerous family members visiting, encouraging her not to participate in the therapy or take medications because of their cultural beliefs. As a treatment team with her husband, we ultimately had to refrain family members from visiting because they impacted the patient. She eventually received ECT treatments and improved significantly from her catatonic state. It was a difficult decision for her husband to make, and it was difficult to keep family from visiting because of how important family is to her culture. While the family is an essential aspect of her life, we could provide quality, effective care the patient needs for recovery by restricting visitation.

Patient values and preference

Evidence-based medicine should be reflective of shared decision-making to improve the quality of healthcare. Decisions should reflect the patient’s values and circumstances (Hoffmann et al., 2014). While we provided opportunity for shared decision-making, her cultural beliefs became an obstacle when her family told her not to comply. We ultimately improved her healthcare outcome by improving her compliance with the treatment. It was important to incorporate her husband’s preference. ECT was ended early because the patient had exhibited improvement, and the patient could provide some insight. The treatment team provided care through patient-centeredness, which took into consideration the preference and values of this patient once she was more coherent in providing her opinion (Melnyk & Fineout-Overhold, 2018).

Decision aid inventory

The decision aid I decided to use was the Continue, adjust, or stop antipsychotic medications: Developing and user testing an encounter decision aid for people with first-episode and long-term psychosis. This patient suffered from chronic mental health issues, including psychosis. She had multiple life stressors and was noncompliant with medication. Through education efforts, we were able to provide the ECT treatments this patient needed for improvement. Her husband was very skeptical and unsure, but after proper medication and collaboration with healthcare staff, he identified her best interests and pursued treatment, despite her family’s beliefs. This encounter decision aid (EDA) provides patients and family members with information associated with their chronic psychosis about the importance of medication adherence and the potential side effects of abruptly discontinuing (Zisman-Ilani et al., 2018).


Introduction 

Shared decision making is when the clinician and the patient work together by discussing options, the benefits and harms while considering the patient’s values. SDM is what links effective communications skills with the patient and EBM. (Hoffman et al 2014). 

In this discussion, I am going to present a hypothetical patient having some similarities with the patients I encounter daily at work and how patients’ preferences might or might not affect their treatment. 

Patient Experience encountered 

Working in an inpatient psychiatry unit, we encounter patients in crisis and some having a psychotic breakdown. Some months back, we had a 59-year-old lady, Mrs. Maposa, (not her real name nor actual age), who had recently lost her husband of 30 years. Mrs. Maposa was grieving and did not want to eat or take care of herself, she lost weight, stopped taking her anxiety and depression medications, neglected her pets and her house became a mess. Family members and friends tried to encourage her to resume her medications and she simply could not hence the psychotic breakdown. Finally, the family and friends called the crisis center due to the patients’ deterioration and an involuntary commitment was initiated (302) due to patient being a danger to herself, poor self-care and endangering her own pets. (Parker et al 2020) 

The first few days after admission into the behavioral health unit, Mrs. Maposa declined any kind of assessment, declined to talk to the doctors or anyone in the treatment team. Mrs. Maposa did not shower or perform hygiene, and her body odor worsened. She refused any offer for meals and only drank one packet of milk and 2 small juices a day. 

At the end of the 302-involuntary commitment, which is the 5th day (120 hours), Mrs. Maposa had a Psychiatric Mental Health Hearing and was committed to a period not exceeding 20 days. (303-involuntary commitment). The attending Psychiatrist, Mrs. Maposa’s eldest Son and daughter both who lived out of state testified and confirmed that their mom needed treatment. 

The attending doctor ordered inpatient psychiatric consultation, (second opinion), for medication over objection. On the same day, another psychiatrist reviewed Mrs. Maposa and a determination was made to restart Mrs. Maposa’s antidepressants and antianxiety medications with an alternative to get an injection if Mrs. Maposa refused to take her oral medication. 

Within 3 days of restating her medication, Mrs. Maposa showed improvement, showered, and even ate a decent meal. Mrs. Maposa started attending therapeutic groups, and even talked to a few peers in the unit. By the end of the week, she had regained her insight and was visited by her family and plans were started on when to discharge her back home with helpful resources. 

Incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values and the Impact on the outcome of patient’s treatment plan. 

On admission, Mrs. Maposa was not cooperating with the treatment options she was being provided with and was not in the mental capacity to make a rational decision. The death of her beloved husband made her stop caring for herself and it took the intervention of her loved ones and friends to seek help even if she did not want it herself. 

Fortunately, her children were on board with the treatment plan, and this made it possible for the proper intervention to be implemented and as much as it might have been against the patient’s preference, the result was acceptable. 

Patient preferences and values and how they might impact the trajectory of the situation. 

The patient was in a helpless, hopeless state and had given up as evidenced by poor self-care and no regard for her wellbeing and that of her pets. Had she been left like that; her state would have deteriorated further with worst case scenarios including being suicidal and or attempting suicide. This is why her loved ones and the treatment team intervened to give her the help she needed. This is why it is important for clinicians and patients/surrogates to use a shared decision-making process that is well defined with overall goals of care for the patient. (Kon et al 2016). 

Decision Aid 

Antipsychotic Medication Decision Aid. 

I selected this Decision Aid because it aligns with the patient’s significant others decision for their loved one, who in this case is their mother. (Zisman-Ilani et al 2018). 

This decision aid identifies the fact that not all patients need to be on antipsychotics forever, for someone having acute psychotic breakdown like Mrs. Maposa, started adjusting and even stopping some antipsychotics like the injectables for Mrs. Maposa is a wonderful way to get patient adherence to treatment. 

All these years I have been working in the inpatient psychiatry unit, we have been using this model and I did not even know that it existed. I am glad and ready to embrace it in my daily work and disseminate it to my colleagues. 

In conclusion, the quick and collaborative response of the family, friends and the treatment team helped restore Mrs. Maposa back to her normal state and she was discharged stable enough to resume her usual activities in the community.


Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples.

In our assisted living we have a resident who was at high risk for falls due to diagnosis, medication, and use of a walker. She had 6 falls in three months. As her nurse, I looked at each fall, the time it took place, what she was doing, and what fall interventions we had put in place. Out of the 6 falls, five of the falls took place right before dinner and she was getting ready to ambulate down for dinner.  A meeting was set up with her primary physician, her POA, (her niece), and myself. We discussed the falls and asked the resident what she thought she needed from us to be safe. The resident explained that she was feeling weak, and not as strong as she had been. It was discussed that her four-wheeled walker often rolled away from her and that a fall intervention had been put in place for education regarding the walker and keeping it close, however, the walker rolling ahead of the resident while ambulating and had been the cause of two falls. The resident was asked about using a front-wheeled walker instead. She did not like this idea. Her primary physician educated her on the risks and benefits of the front-wheeled walker and her overall safety. Her primary physician asked her if she would try it and work with PT on ambulation and exercises to strengthen her muscles. The resident thought that this could help and was open to trying it. Her primary physician put in a referral for PT to evaluate and treat the resident. The resident was asked how she felt about having staff walk with her to meals at the dinner hour until she felt stronger. The resident liked this idea. The resident’s niece brought a front-wheeled walker in for the resident and took the four-wheeled walker home. Nursing coordinated her appointments, updated her care plans, and educated staff on new interventions for the resident.

Then, explain how including patient preferences and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan.

In this situation, the resident was identified to be at risk. The resident needed to be in control of her treatment plan, but she also needed the knowledge and evidence-based practice to make informed decisions for herself. By incorporating the patient and her primary care provider along with the people in her life who took care of her, the team was able to apply knowledge and visit with her about her personal preferences, to provide the best possible care (Melnyk-Overholt, 2018). By including the primary care physician and family, the nurse was able to have an impact on the treatment plan, with the resident’s response enhancing her own outcome (Kon et al., 2016). The risk of the resident not being educated could result in a fall causing significant harm or even death. A fall could also result in a hospitalization, but with her care team looking at her care and her safety, this helped in possibly reducing hospital admission (Schroy et al., 2014).

Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision-making in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision-aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.

A decision aid that I found useful was the Ottawa Personal/Family Decision Guides. This tool helps guide the nurse and the resident to make health decisions (Melynk & Overholt, 2018). This tool will help with my professional practice by using the evaluation tool kit to help guide decision-making and provide any barriers that may need to be looked at.


Importance of Shared Decision Making (SDM)

Shared decision making (SDM) is an important aspect of planning and coordinating patient care. Through SDM, patients and families have the opportunity to obtain and process information regarding their diagnosis and treatment. Patient involvement in the decision-making process is a critical component of patient centered care. As stated by Hoffman, Montor and Del Mar (2014), even if providers attempt to incorporate patient preferences into the decision-making process, they sometimes guess them wrong. Therefore, SDM should occur as often as possible when making critical care decisions.

Personal experience with SDM

One personal experience that comes to mind when I think about SDM occurred in the ICU. We had a young individual with a poor prognosis after cardiac arrest. The nurses, myself included, tried our best to educate and comfort the family. We held multiple family meetings in which we discussed the family’s wishes, the patient’s prognosis, and the (limited) treatment options. After months of weekly or biweekly family meetings and discussions regarding the patients care, the family came to a consensus, and we proceeded as they wished. The whole situation was honestly very sad.

In cases such as this, I always wish that everyone had an advanced directive so that we could know how to proceed and what their wishes are. Of course, that’s not always the case, especially with younger individuals. I believe that in this scenario, we respected the family’s wishes, and the plan of care was carried out per their request.

Decision Aid

The decision aid I chose was an ICD decision aid. Whether or not to get an ICD is a big decision to make for heart failure patients. The ICD decision aid chosen is available in video or booklet form, in both English and Spanish. It contains really great information about what an ICD is, why it has been recommended, and statistics on post implantation complications (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator [ICD] – Colorado Program for Patient Centered Decisions, 2019). This is valuable because it gives the patient something to keep and review during the decision-making process. They may want to share it with their family, so that everyone is on the same page.

In summary, SDM should be part of all critical care decisions. Including patients and families in the decision-making process can lead to more optimal health outcomes including less anxiety, quicker recovery, and increased compliance with recommended treatment (Shared Decision-Making, 2012). Resources such as decision aids should also be used whenever possible, as it gives patients and families something to review and use during the decision-making process.


As a registered nurse working with the younger population in behavioral health, there are instances where they are too young to make their own decision, one was a five-year-old kid who was normally aggressive to staff without reason due to being idle on the unit, he usually would tear up the unit because he was bored. I was able to talk with the doctors to enable the child to have some kind of incentive on the unit, this might allow the child something to do and be less aggressive to staff members. The incentives were agreed by the doctor, and this made a different in the patient life. One of the incentives was to allow patient extra sleep time in the morning to prevent aggression in the morning, also allow the use of coloring and games extra time for the kid as well. As nurses, our focus is on improving the well-being and comfort of our patients, including decreasing patient length of stay, decreasing risk of infections, and preventing pressure ulcers. As NPD practitioners, calculating the financial impact of educational interventions by measuring the outcomes can change the perspective of organizational leaders toward education from one of activities to meaningful accomplishments with great benefit to the organization (Opperman et al., 2016).

The patient treatment plan was impacted because within a two -week period of using the incentives for the five-year-old kid. We were able to see less aggression on the unit and better behavior by the kid. Evidence shows user-centered design approaches lead to higher-quality interventions, increased user acceptance, and improved efficiencies due to the early identification and rectification of usability problems before the launch of the intervention (Hussain et al.,2022).

The use of educational literature plays a role in patient decision making. I have seen this method effectively inform and encourage patient to making decisions that affect their lifetime. I love reading educational literature and have used it in many personal areas of my life. By building a realistic, collaborative maintenance plan with patients, goals can be reached with confidence and control. For the practitioner, utilizing appointment times for a better purpose ensures a holistic approach alongside patient compliance with every encounter. For the service, waste is reduced, variation considered, and non-attendance appointments reduced (Lawrence,2022).


Patient-centered care concept emphasizes the importance of including patient preferences, beliefs, and values when providing care. Notably, some patients today already understand their role in their care when they visit a healthcare facility. Some know they have the right to refuse treatment (Bombard et al., 2018). In this respect, healthcare providers should always involve patients in decision-making regarding their care to achieve the desired treatment outcomes.

A once-experienced situation involved a 78-year-old white male with Alzheimer’s disease. After evaluating the patient, it was established that his symptoms could best be managed using a combination of pharmacological and psychotherapy interventions. The choice of therapeutic interventions must always be supported by research evidence, and published literature supports the use of pharmacological and psychological interventions in managing symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (Blackman et al., 2021; Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). However, the patient did not want to use medications, indicating that they are associated with adverse side effects. While incorporating the patient’s preferences, I helped him understand the benefits of medications and psychotherapy. I even guided him on what to do if he experiences side effects after using drugs (Hoffmann et al., 2014). Incorporating patient preferences and values positively affected the treatment plan and the trajectory of the situation. For example, the patient agreed to use medication, which was reflected in the treatment plan.

The use of patient decision aid enhances clinical decision-making and leads to positive health outcomes for patients. The chosen patient decision aid is “Alzheimer’s disease: should I take medicine?” This decision aid might contribute to effective decision-making in general and in the scenario described by guiding the clinician to treat Alzheimer’s disease using medicine when they are considered helpful. The clinician can also use other interventions to reduce confusion and improve memory (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2022). The nurse will use this decision-aid inventory in professional practice when treating Alzheimer’s disease patients whose symptoms are interfering with daily living.


Providing patient-centered care entails interventions aimed at restoring a patient’s health by empowering him as a self-managing person and enabling him to take responsibility for his wellbeing (Lipovetski and Cojocaru, 2019). It is essential that patients are involved in their treatment plan. Including patients in their treatment plans gives them the opportunity to contribute to their own health care decisions. A patient’s involvement in the treatment decision-making process enhances health outcomes, improves compliance with the treatment regimen, and improves the quality of life of the patient.

The psychiatric facility where I work encourages patient participation in the treatment plan and allows them to participate in the decision-making process regarding their healthcare. The treatment team consists of multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals who are responsible for developing comprehensive treatment plans for each patient. Among the members of the treatment team, you will find a psychiatrist, a medical doctor, nurses, social workers, dieticians, advanced practice psychiatric nurses, psychologists, and patient advocates. Every morning, the team meets in collaboration with patients to evaluate their treatment progress and to make clinical decisions aimed at improving their health outcomes.

One of the experiences I had, involved a patient with bipolar disorder who refused to comply with his medications and unit activities despite extensive counseling by the nurses. The patient remained selectively mute and was always found in his room, not interacting with those around him. During the treatment team meeting, the patient alleged that he was sexually abused by one of his peers and was threatened never to speak out. As a result, the patient suggested that he should be moved to another unit where he would feel more comfortable. An investigation was conducted in order to find out what had truly happened. As a result, the perpetrator was returned to jail, and the patient (victim) was transferred to a different unit. This issue was appropriately addressed, and the patient was satisfied with the outcome. The patient felt safe once again and was more compliant with his medications as well as the daily activities of the unit.

By taking into consideration the patient’s preference for being transferred to a different unit, he felt more safe, which subsequently led to a better health outcome. Involving patients in their treatment plan allows healthcare professionals to identify their mental health needs and develop collaborative clinical decisions to meet their needs. Identifying patients’ mental health problems early facilitates the provision of early support services to prevent psychological deterioration (Wu, 2019).

According to the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2019, patient decision aids are tools that help individuals become involved in decision-making by providing information about options and outcomes and clarifying personal values. Decision aids help the patient identify his needs in order for him to be able to determine the treatment options that are available to him, the questions that he may wish to ask his health care providers, and how he will make informed decisions that will serve his interests.

I will incorporate the decision aid inventory into my clinical practice in order to empower my patients to make informed healthcare choices. The decision aid tool will give patients an increased sense of control and provide a sense of satisfaction in being part of their own treatment. The decision aid tool will be included in their treatment plan, and I will provide the support necessary for them to successfully use it.


Patient Preferences and Decision-Making

I once worked as an ICU nurse. There is one instance involving an 84-year-old patient who was brought into the unit complaining about severe pain having developed gallbladder issues, and needing an urgent surgical procedure. Up until 12 months ago, the patient would walk up to 10 miles. Following the doctor’s assessment and judgment, it was decided that the patient was bound to benefit immensely from the procedure since the patient was still active.

I often experienced cases like that requiring the use of values and patient reference, which significantly influenced the treatment plan. Alfahmi (2022) observed that nurses do everything to save their patient’s lives, and ensure everyone is healthy. Following years of experience, nurses have learned to act realistically, and cognitively when such patients are brought to the unit. Thus, the treatment plan would benefit from incorporating preferences and outcomes.

Patient preferences and values would impact the situation trajectory, which is also reflected in the treatment plan. For instance, patient preferences and values, when combined with clinical guidelines, provide the needed direction to select viable treatment options, and tailor interventions for use in the treatment plan (Gruß & McMullen, 2019). These preferences and values can also be used to inform clinical decisions for healthcare problems plaguing the patient.

The value of the patient decision aid selected (palliative care aid) was one of the palliative care options, which included the option for euthanasia. The decision to allow end-of-life care or continue with the treatment ultimately rests on the patient and the surrogate. Making such a decision would be difficult for everyone, including the clinicians, and may require intense training for effective communication (Tringale et al., 2022). This facilitates treatment decisions.

I might use such a decision-aid inventory in my personal life or professional practice by considering values, goals, and preferences as part of the evidence-based decision and treatment. I would also use it to complement the clinicians’ approach to increase knowledge and experience.


MAIN POST

Description

The best story I know would be of an end-of-life/hospice care patient who chose to forego their ER visit/trip. Knowing that they had chosen hospice and that the ER visit could kick them off of hospice, they do not want strenuous life-saving measures anymore. This is such a difficult decision for the patient, their family, and even the staff because they know the ultimate cost of the decision. I feel it is vital that we involve patients in their care and, ultimately, their decision about their care. After all, do we want to be able to make our own decisions and be involved in our care?

Explanation

            Research shows that involving patients in their care and allowing them in the decision-making process increases patient satisfaction levels, educates the patients on their disease process/prognosis, reduces anxiety, have a better view of what is necessary for their care, and in some cases increases outcome levels (Krist et al., 2017). Ultimately, this left the care decision in that patient’s hands, and they could choose. I feel it set their mind at ease that they were in control of their destiny and had limited time left here on earth. Not choosing to go to the ER and extending life-saving measures speeds up the transition process. Often, I feel like people forget that most of these patients have lived good, long lives and have come to terms with that when it is their time, it is their time. Coming from a long stretch of working in long-term care, patient-centered care is vital, and I am so grateful for the time I spent there to adopt that way of thinking into my practice.

Explanation of Trajectory

            It is different in many settings, but in long-term care; the patients are fully engaged in their care plan/plan of care. They attended meetings and mostly had a decision in their care and what they did/didn’t want. The trajectory of the situation described above was ultimately a quicker death which can be difficult for the patient and family member. So, even though it may be hard for the family and what they may not be prepared for, the care we provide for patients should be patient-centered. Patient-centered care can be defined as providing respectful care to patients, specific to what the patient needs and wants, and ultimately, honoring what the patient holds the most important (MeInyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

Decision Aid

            A decision aid is a helpful way for patients to be involved in their care and make choices for their future and care. The tool shows what will happen if you forego one route vs. the other. The specific one I found was titled: “Advance Care Planning: Should I stop treatment that prolongs my life?”  (The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2019). I had never heard of this service, but I suppose it could help a patient see both views of what it could be if they chose one route over the other. For example, a patient could reflect on if I choose hospice, choose not to go to the hospital, and could experience worsened symptoms of this disease process. But ultimately, I am at peace and choose quality over quantity in my last days.  Or the patient could choose to continue treating the disease process and use the ER for life-saving measures to extend their life. The patient must be somewhat tech-savvy or have assistance accessing this website. I feel this could be helpful in my practice in the future with helping a patient deal with anticipated grief related to death and dying. This could be a way to show a patient the cause and effect of their choices as well. I would describe this aid as cause and effect and could be used in anyone’s personal or professional life for many health problems or scenarios.


Incorporating Patient Preferences

I had a scenario once in which a patient was faced with the decision to have a pacemaker/ICD placed. This patient had poor quality of life at baseline, with several comorbidities including kidney failure requiring hemodialysis. The patient’s ejection fraction (EF) was around 20-25%, which is the reason for considering a pacemaker/ICD. Patients who have a low EF are at risk for sudden cardiac arrhythmias, and an ICD is one way to prevent cardiac death from lethal arrhythmias. This patient discussed with their family and decided not to have the pacemaker/ICD placed. They felt that the addition of an ICD would lead to more hospitalizations, more issues, and prolong suffering.

Physicians and nurses felt this would’ve been an easy decision to make; having an ICD placed would prevent this patient’s death from a cardiac arrhythmia, however they did not take into consideration quality of life. They tried counseling the patient that the procedure would not take long and is not complicated. Physicians struggled when the patient and family asked for a consult with our Palliative Care Team. The patient ultimately decided not to have the ICD placed, and code status was changed to DNR/DNI – do not resuscitate/do not intubate. Our Palliative Care Team is wonderful and helped the patient to understand that the ICD would not change current health state, it would only prevent sudden cardiac death.

Patient Decision Aid and Shared Decision Making

The patient decision aid I chose in this situation that I feel would be most helpful is “Heart Failure: Should I Get an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)? This decision aid is a very straightforward and informative guide. I feel that physicians are not always as honest with patients as they should be, and this decision aid puts information into simple and honest terms that patients and their families can easily understand.

Shared decision making is also an important aspect of treatment plans. SDM is when physicians and patients/families work collaboratively to make healthcare decisions based on evidence-based practice, while incorporating the patient/families’ values, opinions, and views (Kon, Davidson, Morrison, Danis & White, 2016).

Decision Aids in Everyday Life

I feel that the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide would be helpful to incorporate into complex life decisions. This decision aid is like a fancy pros and cons list. I often make pro/con lists whether it be mentally or writing out a list when I’m faced with difficult decisions in life. Sometimes physically seeing the decision at hand, written out makes it better than just thinking about things in your head. This decision aid also incorporates the values of others, like family and friends if you choose to include them when making decisions.


MAIN POST:

Introduction. 

Patient decision aids assist patients in becoming more active participants in making healthcare choices by providing up-to-date information that helps them communicate or seek clarification on treatment options to make more informed decisions (Li et al., 2021). Decision aids include information on the clinical problem as well as outcome probabilities. However, to deliver patient-centered care, it is essential to understand the type of patient that has the disease so that evidence-based practices and treatments can be integrated into the patient’s care only after congruency between decision and personal values and preferences has been clarified and accepted by the patient (Melnyk& Fineout-Overholt, 2019; Stacy et al.,2017).

Situation I experienced.

When admitting a patient into the older adult behavioral health unit, they are to be offered a voluntary admission if they are cognitively able to make that decision. Suppose the patient cannot; this decision is given to their power of attorney (POA). The patient or PAO acknowledges how the unit works, agrees to treatment, and understands their rights. Understanding the life of the patient helps in many ways in behavioral health. Therefore, we lean on the patient and their power of attorney to provide us with information about them so that the healthcare team can help care for and understand the patient. Although POAs make decisions for the patient, regardless of their cognitive impairment, the patients keep all their rights except to bear arms. Constant communication and reminder of the set goal and clarifying their priorities helps guide the treatment plan. Older adults with dementia have trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions. Therefore, utilizing their priorities helps patients and PAO make decisions to achieve the outcome goal.

An example is a patient referred to us who was originally from home with combative behavior, a family member who is the POA wanted the patient to be placed into a facility because it was too much for her without admitting to inpatient psych. She was educated on the purpose of admitting her mother and accepted to admit. However, she did not want to give consent for any antipsychotic medication. It was explained to her that her loved one would not be accepted by a facility with combative behavior and refusing care because it would be a risk to herself and others. Education was given on the signing-in process, resources available, her and her loved one’s rights, the follow-up call to get psychosocial information, her decision of preferences on emergency interventions, medications use, side effects, and how it related to her mother’s conditions. Our common goal was to stabilize her mother’s behavior so that we could place her in a facility close to home. During the patient’s stay, we found common ground where we could get consent for some medications and try alternative treatments that honored her values and preference. We also identified patterns associated with her behavior so that the new facility could better care for her at discharge. In the end, the patient was cooperative and pleasant, and the family was grateful and satisfied with the decisions made as a collaborative team.

Decision Aid.

The decision aid I chose was the Ottawa’s hospital research institute “mild problems with thinking or memory: options to maintain mental skills in older adults.” This decisional aid allows individuals to clarify their priorities and choose from different options to maintain their mental skills and develop mechanisms to compensate for them that match their values and preferences. Identifying what is important to each patient is essential to help them stay focused during a frantic time and understand how their decision affects their priorities. In the future, I will implement this decision aid with families and patients to help them identify their priorities and what is important to them. Therefore, they can see how their decisions, values, and preferences are reflected in their care plans to help them reach their goals.


Personal experience with the patient 

I am an Emergency Department nurse with 3+ experience, and I recently I started a travel contract as an Urgent Care Nurse. As much as I don’t see critical patients in urgent care, I do see patients needing further evaluation and treatment. Last week, I had a 67-year-old Hispanic female patient who came in c/o of recurrent fevers. After drawing basic blood work and obtaining her urine, it was significant that she was either septic or at risk of developing sepsis as artificial intelligence helped to flag potential risks in our system. Due to limited resources at Urgent Care, it was our duty to offer and encourage transport to the emergency department for further evaluation because as the provider stated, “She might be septic and should go to the hospital”. Unfortunately, the Patient seemed to be in denial and declined transport to the hospital and requested take-home treatment which the physician agreed to after having the patient sign the leave against medical advice (AMA) form.  I witnessed a lot of patients being in denial of their own condition, and I was very aware that patients in denial should be approached in a different way as they are not thinking clearly. I, unfortunately, witnessed many providers unemphatically approach the shared decision-making process leading to minimal effort in helping the patient understand the severity of their condition, and giving up on care if the AMA form is signed.

Instead of getting the AMA form signed, I printed the blood work and urine results and went inside the patient’s room to once again speak to her about her decision. I presented the definition of Sepsis, its signs, and symptoms, as well as its rapid progression and potentially lethal threat. As I was giving her information little by little, I stopped and made sure that she understands. The more information I shared, the quieter and more anxious the patient got. Finally, I asked if the patient is still declining transport for further evaluation, and thankfully the patient said NO and agreed to be transferred to the main Emergency Department (same organization as Urgent Care).

 

Patient values and preference

The provider’s brief statement that she “might be septic and needs to go to the hospital” wasn’t enough for the patient to fully understand the severity of the situation. Because of that, the patient preferred to be discharged home with medications instead of being further evaluated. The patient’s values and preferences were initially valid as the patient was under the wrong impression of her own condition. Therefore, the patient is a good candidate to provide shared decision-making, the obstacle in this situation lies within the provider and his inability and lack of motivation to ensure the patient is aware of her condition (Shared Decision-Making, 2012). After providing adequate education, patients’ preferences and values changed accordingly, where health was a priority.

 

Decision aid inventory

The decision aid I chose is adequate patient education about the patient’s condition to allow the patient to make a conscious decision about transfer for further treatment at an Emergency Room. As an Emergency Room nurse, I am fully aware of how lethal sepsis can be, and how early treatment is crucial. It is my obligation to ensure that patients have the same knowledge and understanding so they can make their own conscious decision about their health (Funnell, 2014). In this case, the patient ended up being transferred to the hospital for further testing, including lactic acid levels, which were abnormal. Appropriate antibiotics and fluid replacement protocol were initiated, and the patient was admitted to the intermediate care unit. Had the proper education and understanding of Sepsis not been properly transmitted, the patient would’ve gone home just to further develop sepsis at home, which could’ve resulted in patient’s death.


Main Post

Situation experienced

            Throughout my working experiences as a registered nurse, I had an opportunity to work in different specialties of my choice, including pediatric burn trauma center, extensive metropolitan emergency department, neurology/orthopedics floor, and general medical surgical units. Of these experiences, one patient encounter I had in Emergency Room stands out. The hospital I worked at was a designated trauma center for ophthalmology in the city. On this particular day, I was the assigned nurse for the area coverage for the ophthalmology room. I had a 50 -year old male patient who came in via ophthalmology referral for bleeding in his retina. The immigrant gentleman with limited English as a second language with no insurance and access to healthcare sensed that his vision was blurred, and he saw spots of redness around his sclera lately. He assumed his vision was worsening due to age and didn’t think much of the fact. He went to an optometrist for a new glasses prescription. The optometrist found something abnormal about his eyes and immediately referred him to an ophthalmologist. When the patient visited the ophthalmologist, he found significant pools of blood sitting on the back of his retina and asked him to go to the Emergency Room. The emergency department doctor saw the patient, and soon, a retina specialist consult was placed. The patient had uncontrolled diabetes and never had access to healthcare, so the diabetes was poorly managed, which affected vessels in his eyes. The on-call retinal specialist came, and the patient received emergent surgery to remove the blood in his eye and was able to regain his vision. The emergency department doctor set him an appointment with the primary care doctor.

Patient preferences and values

           The patient was afraid of the medical bills and refused treatment. The doctor and I had to explain to the patient that he might lose eyesight if he avoided the procedure. Then as a team, we had placed a consult for a social worker who came and explained to the patient his options to get coverage for his medical bills. The patient’s preferences and values were validated at this time. The patient was concerned about paying medical bills, so the team addressed this issue by consulting a social worker, who could find a solution for him. “In evidence-based practice, integrating patient preferences and values, clinical expertise and …research to make decisions lead to improved outcomes for patients and families.” (Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). 

Decision aid Inventory

           Hoffmann et al. state that evidence-based practice starts and ends with the patient. It shares that clinicians’ decisions should reflect patients’ values and consider their circumstances. The decision aid inventory I chose for this patient was Type 2 diabetes in adults: controlling your blood glucose by taking a second medicine-what are your options? As the patient follows up with a primary care doctor, he will address the target HbA1c level with him and discuss medicines that they might try to achieve this target. Following up with a primary care doctor will help keep his blood glucose under control and prevent future chronic diagnoses. 


Culture and technology are two areas of healthcare that makes healthcare to be constantly changing. Culture is defined as learned patterns of behavior and values ​​practiced through social interaction, shared by members of a particular group, and transmitted from generation to generation (Baker, 2020). Cultures are diverse, and healthcare professionals must be open to the values ​​and beliefs of others in order to provide the best possible care for each patient. A person’s culture influences their life experiences and, therefore, their perceptions of health, illness, and treatment (Baker, 2020). One of the things I have learned during my long career as a nurse is that as a nurse, you need to learn and understand the cultural contexts of others which helps to facilitate communication and helps create an effective nurse-patient relationship (Baker, 2020). We learn about cultures through education and training, but the best way to learn is from patients as we work with them to determine the best course of treatment and care.

Along with culture, the technology significantly impacts the healthcare sector, increasing opportunities to provide the best possible care to patients. Not only does it help patients learn more about their health, but it also facilitates care collaboration between providers and medical professionals. Increasing culture and technology in everyday life, along with evidence-based medicine, has put the patient in the treatment plan; because the treatment plan is about the patient and must continue after discharge, it makes sense to let them participate. Optimal patient care requires a combination of evidence-based medicine and patient communication (Hoffman et al., 2014).

           At my current job, we seek to incorporate all patients’ values and beliefs into treatment plans by asking for their input, making it difficult to describe an experience. I work in a crisis stabilization center. Many patients are in a mental health crisis when they come to the hospital, and many of them are not at a level where they can decide on a treatment policy at the time of their visit, so the staff begins to develop a treatment plan themselves. It is best not to include the patient in the treatment plan because they are mentally unstable at this time. When the patient is more stable, we bring them in and include them in the planning process. Research shows that patients who participate in health care decisions are more likely to continue to make those decisions after they leave the hospital, which is our facility’s belief. A Nurse Practitioner sees each patient on the care team daily to review the patient’s medications, general condition, and post-discharge care plan. They involve patients in discussions about medication regimens that help or may help improve their mental health, which is reasonable to follow. Ask the patient to create a safety plan to refer to if they are in crisis again. We do not decide for the patient but let them choose the best for their life. Another part of the treatment plan that includes them is the treatment follow-up plan. We assisted them in looking for the phone number of providers in their local area, but they chose which provider to call and book a follow-up. I have seen that this brings better results. Their participation helps us understand their values ​​and beliefs along the way. Patients have the right to be involved in their treatment plans, and we, as providers, try to involve them in all decisions as much as possible.

           Incorporating patient preferences and values ​​does not always lead to the best results. What the provider feels is the right course of action to treat someone, together with clinical expertise, has been effective (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). A patient may disagree with this course of treatment. For example, schizophrenia patients do not believe in drugs for some reason, which may lead to frequent readmission due to the return of symptoms. When discharged, they stop taking medication, against medical advice, thus ending up in another hospitalization. Therefore, when planning a treatment plan, we need to think outside the box and find ways for patients to seek help before they are hospitalized, like symptoms or clues to watch out for. I chose Patient Decision Support for Panic Attacks (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2019). Besides schizophrenia, there are often patients who do not want to take medicine. This help provides information about the disease and the medicines needed to treat it. It explains what to expect and what will happen if you do not take medication to treat it. It also explains why healthcare provider recommends medications, what medications are available, and what medications are used as treatments, and shares other patient personal stories about their thoughts and decisions on medication. Patients’ thoughts and decisions about taking these aids give you a complete view of all aspects of the disease so that you can make an informed decision about any issue. 

As nurses, we know and are taught that patient education is one of the most important things we do as nurses. These aids can be used as educational tools to present facts to patients. This helps patients to be informed about their care and make confident decisions. This tool can be used in our personal life to deal with our health care and the problems of loved ones. The website provided by The Ottawa Hospital Decision Support Resources has a lot of valuable and educational information to share with others.


I experienced quite a few situations where patient preferences played a huge role in their treatment plan. One situation while working in the ICU there was a patient that was a Jehovah’s witness and did not want to receive blood products for their gastrointestinal bleed. The patient has a hemoglobin of 6 and blood was ordered STAT. Time after time physicians and nurse practitioners entered the room trying to explain to the patient that receiving the blood products would help in saving their life and the patient adamantly refused the blood because it was against their religion. Although frustrating and a highly challenging situation, the doctors respected the patient’s wishes and tried to aid in saving their life in other ways (DeLoughery, 2020). The patient accepted scopes and procedures to try to find the source of the bleeding and hoped their body would regenerate the blood cells once the source was discovered. The patients’ plan of care took many different turns and as providers we were biting our nails in hopes they would make a full recovery, but their treatment plan was based on their values and not ours. After much debate it remains true that evidence-based medicine begins and ends with the patient and their wishes come before ours (Hoffman et, 2014). 

Decision Aid 

As I began to watch the patient decline and the family ask for help, the decision aid I chose was patient and family education. I used material printed from our facility which provided information on GI bleeds and treatment options, giving this to the patient and their family allows them to make an evidence-based informed decision (Schroy et.al, 2014). I am fully aware that the decision was made not to receive blood due to religious reasons but after getting to know the family and speaking to them about the disease process, a lack of understanding regarding the benefits of blood products was apparent. I provided education on GI bleeds and what are the options. We went over the options and all the ones we have attempted. I assured them I fully support their decision and realize it is going against their religious beliefs, but it is the only option to save the patient’s life. Once the patient realized they were rapidly declining and I provided the education to the family, I was asked to leave the room while the family discussed options. It is imperative during these times that the burden of decision making is equal amongst family members (Kon et al., 2016). After time passed and the family discussed their decision, much to the provider and my surprise, they decided to accept the blood transfusions that were needed to help save their life. We all made sure the family was clear that all other options had been exhausted and we were extremely hopeful for a positive outcome. Thankfully, the patient did well after a few units of blood, the family was hesitant but thanked us for the understanding and education that was given to them during this challenging time. As providers, we saw just how much education is imperative during these times and a there was a positive outcome for this patient. 


Patient Preferences and Decision Making

Healthcare has developed and changed in many ways, including shifting its focus from clinicians to patients. Melynk and Fineout-Overholt (2018) outlined that patient-centeredness is essential for incorporating patients’ values and preferences into evidence-based practice and decision-making. Every element of a patient’s treatment is decided in collaboration with the patient, and the healthcare team should be sensitive to the individual’s wants and requirements as they make decisions (Melynk & Fineout-Overhold, 2018). Patients actively involved in their care decision-making have better outcomes and perform better in their everyday activities due to their care (Vahdat et al., 2014).

Once during my time working at a hospital in Arizona, I was able to consider patient values and beliefs in a way that ultimately improved the quality of care provided to the patient. A woman in her late twenties presented with dizziness, headaches, and extreme exhaustion. She was scheduled for a heart catheterization, during which her cardiologist established the need for a pacemaker. Upon hearing the news, she was overcome by various conflicting feelings. I, along with her loved ones, tried to convince her that accepting the pacemaker would help save her life. Before making any significant choices in her life, she researched the topic thoroughly and weighed the benefits and risks. I gave her booklets explaining pacemakers and reassured her that her doctors would support her choice. To cut a long tale short, she went through with the operation and afterward expressed her appreciation for the assistance and knowledge she received in making her choice.

People whose heart rates are problematic but have not been diagnosed with heart failure may find this patient decision guide helpful (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2022). In addition, it has a wealth of information on pacemakers, including how to acquire one, what to expect from it, and how to deal with any issues that may arise. In addition, this resource would have been helpful for my patient since it would have prompted her to learn more about pacemakers, reduced her worry, and given her the most trustworthy information from which to make an informed choice. As my career develops, I can provide my present and future patients access to even more valuable learning materials.


N6052 Module 6 Week 11 Main discussion post by Leslie Davis 

Dear Dr. Frazer and colleagues,  

     I work on a cardiac unit and have cared for a lot of patients that are admitted for chest pain. Many of these patients have tests ordered, such as an echocardiogram and a myocardial perfusion test (nuclear stress test). If the patient is found to have a critically low ejection fraction (EF), steps must be taken to protect that patient from life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. It is imperative to include the patient in shared decision-making (SDM) and determine their preferences in order to prescribe the appropriate treatment.  

     Many of the patients I have encountered with low EFs have shown an eagerness to be involved in their plan of care. As Melnyk & Fineholt-Overholt indicate, patient preferences and clinical expertise are essential to making clinical decisions that promote the health and well-being of their patients (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). I believe that an informed patient will be more likely to follow through with the treatment plan. Once it is determined that a patient is at risk due to a low EF, our cardiologists always inform the patient (and family where applicable), thus allowing the patient to become an active participant in the decision-making process. One particular case stands out. A female, in her mid 50’s, with a long history of drug abuse, was found to have an EF of 20%. She was shocked to learn the extent of damage the drug abuse had on her heart. She was very eager to learn all she could about ICD placement and Lifevests, and asked many questions when the physicians made daily rounds. This woman was admitted to my unit for 63 days, because she also required long-term antibiotics for an infection due to IV drug use. She was engaged in her plan of care and always asked questions. She was discharged with a LifeVest and is waiting for an ICD placement. 

     Providing information and education to the patient is essential. Patient decision aids (PDA) are valuable tools that can be used for effective decision-making. I would present these patients with the PDA titled: “Heart Failure: Should I Get an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)?” I have cared for several patients that have needed an ICD and wish I knew about this PDA. Patients are often overwhelmed with information when they are discharged. This PDA would be a good reference to take home.  

     The patients that were waiting for an ICD were sent home wearing a Lifevest. With our cardiologists’ approval, I have used a Lifevest patient education guide from the Cleveland Clinic. This comprehensive guide provides a Lifevest overview and answered many frequently asked questions (Cleveland Clinic, 2022). Using evidence-based medicine with SDM is essential to quality health care. It should begin and end with the patient (Hoffman, Montori, & Del Mar, 2014).  


Shared decision-making (SDM) is a healthcare decision-making model in which clinicians and their patients work together to develop a deeper understanding of the patient’s situation and decide how to proceed (Rabi et al., 2020). In SDM, both the patient and the clinician share information and expertise—the clinician brings to the table medical information about their options, risks, and benefits, and the patient brings to the table their personal preferences and values (Den Ouden et al., 2022). Utilizing both aspects allows for patient-centered care, which is required to integrate patient preferences and values in evidence-based decision-making (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This discussion examines the impact of incorporating patient preferences in values in their treatment plan through shared decision-making to provide quality patient-centered care. 

Personal Experience with Shared Decision Making

A recent situation I encountered was a conversation I had with a 66-year-old female patient regarding her concerns about osteoarthritis of her left hip. She stated that she and her husband try to be fairly active and enjoy bike riding and kayaking often. However, due to the worsening of her condition, it had been very difficult to enjoy the things she had once loved. In addition, she stated she had terrible days where her pain was incredibly intense. After trying multiple therapies and corticosteroid injections, which seemed to help for only a short time, the orthopedic surgeon spoke to her about possibly getting a total hip replacement. Although she was initially agreeable, a few weeks prior to surgery, she grew increasingly concerned. She did not feel like she had adequate support at home during the postop period and preferred to manage her osteoarthritis through continued medication and an alternate physical therapist. In addition, she described her desire to lose weight for the potential improvement of pain and to possibly improve outcomes if she had to go the surgical route in the future. 

The patient verbalizing her preferences and values changed the trajectory of the treatment plan as it was shifted back to medical and therapy management from surgical. The patient stated she initially agreed to the surgery because she did not feel like she had any other choices and felt pressured. After speaking with another healthcare professional and her orthopedic surgeon again before her preop appointment, she made an informed decision she felt comfortable with. Not listening to the patient’s preferences and values in this situation could have led to the patient making an undeveloped decision to get surgery and feeling unsupported during a lengthy postop period.  

Impact of Including Patient Preferences and Values to the Treatment Plan

Patients constantly make decisions throughout their whole healthcare journey. As nurses, we are patient advocates who strive to protect our patients’ rights. This includes the patient’s right to choose their own journey. Nurses are in an excellent position to provide patients with the information and knowledge necessary to make informed decisions regarding care and treatment; ultimately, the decision lies with the patient, who is the central focus of our care. 

Patient Decision Aid

The patient decision aid I would utilize in this situation would be the Arthritis: Should I have Hip Replacement Surgery? Aid which is found on the A to Z Inventory of Decision Aids on the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute page (The Ottowa Hospital Research Institute, n.d.). This was an excellent decision aid, as it was very clear and easy to understand. It allowed the audience to get facts, compare their options, and analyze their feelings to reach a decision. It even allowed the audience to review a brief quiz to test their knowledge (Healthwise, 2022). This helps individuals considering a total hip replacement to make an informed decision that is right for them. 


Recent patient experience
Medication adherence has become as important as a patient’s lab work trends. One of our care management duties at our health center is to follow up on patients who are not getting medications filled as prescribed and evaluate the barriers such as cost, accessibility, understanding of prescription directions, etc. I recently experienced a patient not getting his cholesterol medication filled as prescribed. His fasting lipid panel had not improved on the statin therapy even after a recent increase in the medication strength. The lab work was significantly worse.

I called the patient to inquire about these trends. I started the conversation with the patient by introducing myself and the reason for my call. I then presented the information as stated above. I asked the patient to help me understand, “why do you think your cholesterol has worsened even after your medication was increased?” I noted silence but decided to allow the patient time to respond versus continuing the conversation for him. The patient finally responded and said
you’re the first to ask me what I think. I think it’s not improving because I’m not taking it at all and never have.  I don’t want to be on those medications; they made my brother sick and weak. He no longer goes fishing with me because he can’t walk, and his legs always hurt him. His doctor said he would die if he didn’t take the medications, but he’s not living life taking them. I’m not going to take it, but my doctor keeps refilling it.”

Patient-centered 
I often use motivational interviewing tools when discussing self-management care with patients.  I reflected on what the patient had told me and validated his concerns that he feared the medication would make him sick and he would not be able to fish again. Unfortunately, this case is an example of what happens when shared decision-making is not used. To achieve optimal patient care, evidence-based medicine and patient-centered care must be parallel. (Hoffmann TC, 2014) The patient was encouraged there are other options, and I agreed to talk to his physician for him. Integrating the patients’ preferences and values and enlisting everyone from the care team is a focus of patient-centered care. (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019)

Decision Aid 
A decision-making aid that would be valuable with this patient is Beyond Statins and other LDL Lowering Treatments tools. (Cardio smart, n.d.) This tool would be helpful to review with the patient and to visit options other than statins. There are a lot of patients who are unable to take statins. We need to reassure them it is not the end of the road. There are other options, such as lifestyle changes and different medications that are not statins. We utilize many similar decision-making tools, such as this embedded in the evidence-based protocols of our electronic health records.


Patient involvement drives wise clinical decision-making and subsequent care delivery. One of the key provisions in the definition of evidence-based practice (EBP) is the use of patient preferences along with clinical expertise and academic knowledge to guide decision-making and care delivery processes (Melnyk & Fineout -Overholt, 2018). Therefore, exploiting patient preferences and engaging patients in the healthcare process are credible techniques for achieving EBP outcomes. Analysis of correlations between patient preferences and clinical decision-making will provide essential insights for the implementation of her EBP in clinical practice.

Incorporating the patient’s preferences and values ​​can influence the course of the situation. Reflect positively or negatively on your treatment plan. Patient participation ensures quality and a culturally appropriate, patient-centered approach that improves the quality of life (Ashrafzadeh & Hamdi, 2019). For example, for a diabetes mellitus patient, the inclusion of patient preferences regarding diet, physical activity, and general flexibility resulted in optimal outcomes for patient health. Cultural competence means accepting patient preferences related to their cultural background and using them to improve treatment plans (Jongen et al., 2018). For example, a Muslim patient may prefer halal food in their DM management plan, so the nurse should create a meal plan that favors the patient’s beliefs. Patient values ​​and preferences improve treatment approaches by ensuring that patients are optimally involved in improving their health.

Patient decision support facilitates information delivery and allows patients to reflect on their thoughts and values ​​in the healthcare process. A selected decision aid on the Ottawa Hospital website reads: Taking a Second Medication to Control Blood Sugar—What are the options for adults with type 2 diabetes who are taking a single medication? Other drug options include DPP-4 inhibitors, metformin, pioglitazone, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas (The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, date undated). This decision support is treatment focused and includes patients with type 2 diabetes. Many patients could benefit from learning about other alternatives that support disease management and improve overall health.

Patient decision-making aid and inventory influence my professional practice. They help the patient Make informed decisions about health care, taking into account individual preferences and values ​​(Chenel et al., 2018). Decision support increases patient engagement in healthcare, improves patient knowledge, and increases realistic perceptions of outcomes following informed value-based decisions. Empowered patients work with healthcare professionals to improve health outcomes. Patient decision support improves professional nursing practice. Patient preferences and clinical decisions are directly related to the impact of EBP in the clinical setting. Patient engagement streamlines care delivery through support and a patient-centered approach. The use of decision aids increases patient involvement in the care process and facilitates EBP outcomes.


When I was in nursing school, I had a patient who was 93 years old. She was coming in for heart related issues (can’t remember the specific diagnosis) and her family was very involved in her care. one day, I walked in to take vitals and she was alone with her cardiologist, and he was explaining that she needed to have heart surgery, she was a healthy woman who had never really been sick. Once the physician left, she seemed very upset about their conversation, so I took a moment to speak with her about it. She stated that if it was up to her, she wouldn’t have heart surgery at her age, she was content and said she lived a pretty amazing life. She emphasized that her children would be upset if she did not have the surgery, but she was tired and just wanted to be home in her comforts.

After I left her room, I saw that the cardiologist was sitting at the desk documenting, and I interrupted to speak with him. I explained who I was (just a student at the time) and I shared with him the patients’ concerns. After the conversation the cardiologist went back to her room for further understanding, she explained everything to him, and he eventually agreed especially considering her age. He then called her family and informed them of the patients’ decision to not have the surgery, it seemed like a tough conversation, but they eventually respected their mothers wishes. In this moment I learned the true meaning of advocating for my patient.

A decision aid I found useful is the Ottawa Personal/Family Decision Guides, in this instance the risks we’re too great and the patient found the surgery unnecessary considering her age and other circumstances (Melynk & Overholt, 2018). I realized the need for a further conversation, the patient felt like she did not have say in her own care, but this was based off pressure coming from her family. This tool will help me in the future with conflicts regarding family centered care and  decision making (Spijkers et al, 2022).


A male patient once presented to our clinic complaining of chest pains. This patient was originally from a male dominated culture that did not permit women to be in the workplace but instead should be in the home taking care of the children and family. One of our female nurses attempted to perform the assessment on this particular patient however, the patient refused to have her conduct the assessment. As a male nurse, I had to take over this responsibility and had to complete the patient assessment. I observed that the patient possessed strict values concerning women and their role in society. I had no choice but to respect this patient’s values and interacted with him in a very respectful and sensitive manner (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This interaction allowed my patient to completely communicate his symptoms and issues to me, as I returned sensitivity and respect to him as a patient. This promoted a positive impact on the patient’s care and also on patient outcome. It is important that patients values are respected and patients are treated in a culturally sensitive manner (Kaihlanen et al., 2019). This will promote positive patient outcomes, as the patient feels fully integrated as a part of their own healthcare team.


Ironically enough, a patient recently came in for a procedure in my department, and it was quite clear that she did not want the procedure that she was getting that day. She has a condition called Atrial Fibrillation (AF or A-Fib). We routinely see patients that have AF and perform a varying array of procedures to either get them out of AF and/or get them off of anticoagulation medication. In her case, she is on anticoagulation due to Paroxysmal A-Fib (pAF). PAF is a type of A-Fib that comes and goes on its own. Patients must be anticoagulated to prevent blood clot formation in the heart during episodes of A-Fib. A-fib increases thromboembolic stroke risk by fives times, and 40% of strokes in patients over 80 years old are attributed to A-Fib (Piccini & Fonarow, 2016). The patient that I am referring to was nearly 90 years old and refused to take anticoagulation due to multiple falls. Serious bleeding (internal and external) can occur due to a fall when a patient is on anticoagulation. The procedure that she was having done is referred to as a Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC). This procedure prevents clot formation during episodes of A-Fib and negates the need for anticoagulation. The procedure does have risks, which include death. The risk of major complications is 0.5% per the device manufacturer (Boston Scientific, n.d.)

The patient was with her daughter, and it was obvious that the family wanted her to have the procedure and the patient was against it. I have a strong feeling that the patient had little to no say in the decision to have the procedure. I looked up A-Fib on the decision aid site and found several treatment options, but LAAC was not a treatment option. However, other A-Fib treatments that we commonly perform were on the site. The treatment options on Patient Decision Aids for A-Fib are: Do nothing, treatment with medications, left atrial ablation, and atrioventricular (AV) node ablation with pacemaker implant (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2022). The patient that I am referring to declined all of the treatments and the LAAC, except the “do nothing” option. That was her treatment decision. Nonetheless, due to family pressure she went ahead with the LAAC. The procedure was successful. To my knowledge, the patient spent a complicated-free night in the hospital and went home the next day. Despite the positive results, I cannot help but feel as if the patient was not a part of her own care decision and that is not right. This seemingly took away the right that she has to make her own healthcare decisions.

The decision aid tool has the option to do nothing for a reason. The patient can opt for this, and despite how difficult it might be for the family, this is an option that their loved one can choose. This patient aid tool would have been great for the patient, but in the end, her decision did not matter. I hope this is a situation that I am rarely (if ever) a part of again.


 

Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change.| current problem or opportunity for change| evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP | plan for knowledge transfer of this change,

o Prepare:

  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
  • Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
  • Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
  • Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
  • Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
  • Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
  • Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
  • Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
  • Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
  • Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
    • A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
    • An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)

Alternate Submission Method

You may also use Kaltura Personal Capture to record your narrated PowerPoint. This option will require you to create your PowerPoint slides first. Then, follow the Personal Capture instructions outlined on the Kaltura Media Uploader guideLinks to an external site.. This guide will walk you through downloading the tool and help you become familiar with the features of Personal Capture. When you are ready to begin recording, you may turn off the webcam option so that only “Screen” and “Audio” are enabled. Start your recording and then open your PowerPoint to slide show view. Once the recording is complete, follow the instructions found on the “Posting Your Video in the Classroom Guide” found on the Kaltura Media Uploader page for instructions on how to submit your video. For this option, in addition to submitting your video, you must also upload your PowerPoint file which must include your speaker notes.

Post at least two dissemination strategies you would be most inclined to use and explain why | Explain which dissemination strategies you would be least inclined to use and explain why.| Identify Barriers

Post at least two dissemination strategies you would be most inclined to use and explain why. Explain which dissemination strategies you would be least inclined to use and explain why. Identify at least two barriers you might encounter when using the dissemination strategies you are most inclined to use. Be specific and provide examples. Explain how you might overcome the barriers you identified.


EBP Dissemination Strategies 

According to Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, using research and (EBP) evidence-based practice is the only way to achieve best patient outcomes. There must be a culture of acceptance and readiness to learn about and utilize EBP for implementation to be successful (2018). There are several strategies that can be used to disseminate EBP, but also several barriers.  

Most Likely to Use 

At my organization, “huddles” are held at the start of the 7 am and 7 pm shifts. This is a wonderful time to quickly educate every staff member arriving for their shift. Huddles are also a research-based method to reduce distractions, as they are held away from patient care areas, and have shown to increase overall patient safety and communication among staff members (Kylor, Napier, Rephann, & Spence, 2016). Although this is only reaching a small group at a time, and there are time constraints, the most essential information is reserved for these huddles. This is mostly just an introduction to spread awareness that there will be new policies, procedures, etc. and education will occur later.  

We also have several whiteboards and space for posters, flyers, and printed information to be displayed. Each staff member is responsible for reviewing the information displayed on the huddle boards at their leisure. There are sign-off sheets with education to sign your name once you have read the information. This printed information and sign-off sheets hold each staff member accountable for reviewing the information. Emails are sent to staff who have not completed the required education in a timely manner to remind them to do so.  

Barriers 

As previously mentioned, these beginning of shift huddles are only about five minutes in length. There is not enough time to educate staff but introduce education and display information for staff to review on their own time. It is difficult to evaluate if staff read and understood the information, as the only evaluation is a sign-off sheet. Another major barrier is a culture of “this is the way we have always done things,” which creates a perceived unwillingness to change and resistance to current trends (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). One way to overcome this barrier is to change the culture and ensure staff recognize that EBP (Evidence Based Practice) is grounded in research and has proven to provide best outcomes for patients (Newhouse, Dearholt, Poe, Pugh, & White, 2007). 

Least Likely to Use 

One strategy I would be least likely to use would be a seminar or other form of oral presentation. At my organization, we have had several seminars, talks, etc. cancelled because of staffing constraints. In a survey regarding EBP, staff mentioned feeling overwhelmed with their workloads and expectations, stating they felt a lack of support from their organizations (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Support from administration could include bringing in additional staff on the days these seminars are held so staff do not have to attend educational events on their days off.  

Another strategy I would be least likely to use would be social media. My organization has several social media pages where information and education is posted. There are also weekly updates that are sent via email and other methods like Microsoft Teams with educational information. I have found staff do not have enough time during the workday to read all this information. Staff have also verbalized wishing to “leave work at work” and not have to complete work-related tasks on days off. These lengthy emails and updates are not conducive to the current culture of my personal organization, as staffing and workloads are a major issue. 


There are numerous dissemination strategies that can be used to get information out to staff members. Some dissemination strategies are beneficial however, some strategies are not as welcome and make staff feel less inclined to comply with the change. It is imperative then when a change occurs, the organization needs a plan, to be flexible, and listen to the nurses to make one adaptable for them (Newhouse et al., 2007). One dissemination strategy that my organization has implemented that I feel is the most effective is staff meetings to introduce a new policy/procedure, this allows staff to ask questions and provide feedback on their perceptions and concerns regarding the new policy. Another information outlet to staff that my organization utilizes is hangs up flyers regarding upcoming changes to the organization. I find this dissemination strategy helpful because it gives you the opportunity to become familiar with something new on your own then having it be told you in a demeaning manner. It offers a timeline for staff to be informed on when the change is going to occur and what to expect in the upcoming months and meetings to follow. This allows staff time to process information and produce questions they may want to ask at the staff meetings.  

There are also less effective dissemination strategies my organization uses like sending out mass emails regarding the latest changes that are occurring. This is a poor dissemination strategy because I have witnessed numerous staff members say they did not get the email or see the email. Unfortunately, the organization we work at sends out several emails a day and most of them are ignored because they come every day and staff does not feel the need to read them as frequently because it feels like “junk” mail. Also, receiving an email is impersonal and not everyone has their email to access at home so at times they are blindsided by changes, and it angers them. Another less effective and more dangerous strategy is social media. We all know that with the rise of technology and social media outlets are being used increasingly, however, there is so much room for negative impacts of this. Anyone can write anything on the internet and social media sites, so the reliability of this information outlet is not effective. It is undetermined that you can trust things you see on social media, so to use this platform, you would need to be able to publish information through a reputable source that induvial would be able to trust the information that are receiving on social media. Through the COVID–19 pandemic, we relied heavily on social media to get information spread quickly, but we all have seen that so much misinformation was also spread through social media.  


Dissemination of EBP developments is imperative to the growth of nursing. As research grows and advances practice models, we must grow and advance with them. Dissemination allows us to inform a large population of nurses and ancillary staff about updates and changes to current practice. “The Nursing Ace” endorses that the key to successful dissemination of information is audience engagement (Dissemination of Evidence Based Practice Project Results in Nursing, 2022).

One method of dissemination that I would be inclined to use is the use of pre-shift huddles. My facility holds nursing huddles prior to 7am and 7pm shifts. during this huddle, we go through safety concerns on the unit and review the current census of the unit. I think this would be a prime opportunity to provide dissemination of information. Another method I would use is to hold monthly staff meetings, via web, telephone, or in person, in which we review upcoming changes to practice recommendations. My current facility does not offer this for my unit, but I think it would be very beneficial in aiding professional growth. My previous facility had monthly meetings via Zoom and it was so convenient to be able to attend from home if I was not already at this hospital. This convenience makes it more likely that people will attend. This meeting should also be made available for viewing after the meeting has taken place. This allows staff members who were unable to participate in real time to get the important information shared during the meeting.

A method of dissemination I would not be likely to use is the use of email. Many of the nurses I talk to, myself included, say that they check their work emails once per week or less. Unless it is marked “urgent” it is unlikely that the information contained in the email will be reviewed in a timely manner. This is not substantial enough to justify its use for sharing important, time sensitive information. Another method I would be unlikely to use is just posting flyers in the break room or conference room. So often, we are so busy with patient care during our shifts that we miss these flyers. This leads to staff members missing important information and EBP updates.

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies

There are potential barriers to these chosen dissemination strategies. One of these is limited training time (Corrigan et al., 2001). Pre shift huddles often only last 5 to 10 minutes. This leaves little time for questions should they come up. While monthly staff meetings allow more time for questions, some individuals may need hands-on instruction rather than verbal instruction on upcoming changes. There could also be limited understanding on proposed changes by the charge nurses (Corrigan et al., 2001). This means they will be unable to answer questions promptly and may need to reach out for clarification, resulting in delayed answers for staff. This can waste valuable time when it comes to implementing EBP changes.

Overcoming Identified Barriers

To overcome these barriers there are a few actions we can take. If possible, we can leave the charge nurse out of staffing, or at least give her a lighter assignment so that she will be available throughout the shift to provide hands on instruction and assistance if needed. To do this, there are other barriers with staffing we must overcome, bit I do think that this will be beneficial long term. Additionally, we can have self-explanatory, user-friendly guides available for review on the units. The nurse can review the guide prior to performing the procedure in question. Charge nurses should also attend their own meetings so that they are up to date on all of the most recent and upcoming recommendations for practice so that they may serve as a resource for the staff.


Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

Healthcare is constantly changing. With this change, nurses must be provided with the tools and environment to adapt to this change to continually provide safe and efficient patient care (Melnyk & Overholt, 2018). Healthcare leaders function each day with the ultimate goal of not causing harm to the sick, thus, ensuring that the care provided is supported by current and tested evidence (Caramanica & Gallagher-Ford, n.d.).  The evidence-based practice fosters better patient outcomes and nursing autonomy. Thus, this new information should be available to all clinicians (Newhouse et al., 2007). However, providing information alone will not ensure clinician’s to use EBP (Melnyk et al., 2011). In the dissemination strategy, I will most likely use evidence-based poster presentations. According to Melnyk & Overholt (2018), information about your work is prioritized in posters. Additionally, signs are displayed longer, which will give more time for interaction with colleagues and are less intimidating. Moreover, additional information may be provided through handouts.

Another strategy I prefer is media. Due to increased popularity, this may find funding for future research. Additionally, it is a means to attract the most qualified individuals to work for your institution. Most importantly, increased funding means increased student jobs and further change in public health (Melnyk & Overholt, 2018).

I will least likely use panel presentations and round table presentations. Although panel presentations are advantageous in that clinicians with different backgrounds can share knowledge, it takes a knowledgeable panelist and moderator to make them successful (Melnyk & Overholt, 2018). It needs more work organizing and briefing panelists. On the other hand, round table presentations allow a common topic for discussion and practical application. However, one must consider environment in which round table presentations will take place as too crowded space will cause delays(Melnyk & Overholt, 2018).

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies/ Overcoming Identified Barriers

According to to Melnyk & Overholt (2018), poster needs to be built to catch the attention of the audience. If poorly designed, this will lead to poor format, information too much or not enough. To overcome this, one must learn how to present information that is concise making sure that the information stays relevant. In addition, presenters are expected to be beside the poster to answer questions from participants. However, scheduling the schedule for which the presenter is at the poster may help this issue so much so that interested participants will come together in a specific time. On the other hand, disadvantage of using media will be information overload for those who encounter it. To overcome this, one must make sure that information is clear and easy to understand. Melnyk & Overholt (2018) mentioned that one must use short sentences , and key messages should be summarized.


EBP Dissemination Strategies: Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

I would be most inclined to use two dissemination strategies: small groups and social media. Small group dissemination is beneficial when working in a hospital setting where multiple departments are involved in the care of patients. Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2018) stated that disseminating in small groups can be beneficial in both grand and clinical rounds to provide an opportunity for the provider to discuss evidence-based research for advancing clinical practice. It will be necessary for the presenter to identify the clinical question, conduct evidence-based research, and recommend appropriate measures for patients. It will provide an opportunity for patients to receive informed, evidence-based care.

Another strategy I am most inclined to use is social media. This is an effective way to relay information to many people when change is necessary. Social media allows researchers to a network by connecting them to other researchers, clinicians, policymakers, the public, and stakeholders at a global level (Lee et al., 2021). Providing an opportunity for international networking can expand research efforts and provide valuable insight from other evidence-based researchers for further examination and positive impact.

The strategy I would be least likely to use is through a podium or oral presentations. While this is an effective way to present information, I am not the kind of person who enjoys public speaking in front of a large audience. While I do not enjoy public speaking, some people do, and it can be an effective way to present information to a targeted group. Podium presentations allow individuals to present the evidence-based research conducted, provide opportunities for networking and improve public speaking skills (Stec et al., 2021).

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies and how to Overcome them

Barriers to using dissemination in rounding include the initiation and implementation of change. It can be challenging to convince a healthcare team of change in care. Still, well-educated research can assist in initiating the identified intervention needed for the care of a patient or patient population. To support the argument, it will be essential to conduct evidence-based research before presenting the proposed change to the interdisciplinary group. During the implementation phase, it will be essential to incorporate core nursing staff and educate them on why this intervention benefits the identified patient or group for increased compliance.

Barriers to disseminating in social media include difficulty in filtering peer review and possibly misinterpreting the research presented. Strategies to overcome these barriers include carefully evaluating reviews to identify inaccuracies and correcting or refuting reviews on postings (Dijkstra et al., 2018). When it comes to misinterpretation, it will be important not to simplify or exclude vital information. It will also be important to present information concisely and accurately to avoid misunderstanding and be active in the conversation thread with evidence-based information to refute misconceptions.


Introduction

In healthcare, it is important that dissemination occurs in the workplace so that evidence-based practice can be communicated amongst staff members so that each patient gets the same level of care. Nurses who are competent in evidence-based practice should share this information with other staff members to ensure this. There are many ways that information can be shared, otherwise known as dissemination. The aim of this discussion post is to identify at least two dissemination strategies that I would be most inclined to use and one that I would be least inclined to use, as well as barriers that could be encountered.

Most Used Strategies

There are many strategies as well as reasons to disseminate evidence-based practice amongst staff. When evidence-based practice is implemented, there are reports of higher job satisfaction, lower turnover rate, and improved patient outcomes (Melnyk et al., 2011). To accomplish this, evidence-based practice should be considered the “norm” of the facility. One strategy to disseminate evidence-based practice that I find beneficial is to hold meetings with all staff so that the opportunity to ask questions can occur. Most of the staff could be considered stakeholders in the organization and it is important to make sure that their voices are heard. Strategies to engage stakeholders including building trust, understanding interests, soliciting input, connecting in a collaborative way, and promoting active engagement (Gallagher-Ford et al., 2011). Another strategy to disseminate information is through a change of shift report. Where I work, there is a general “huddle” that is read that applies to all staff before specific change of shift report information is given. This is used to communicate any changes or updates that need to be made aware of. I like this form of dissemination as each staff member is required to sign a log, verifying that they heard the “huddle” so that accountability for changes can be held.

Least Used Strategies

One dissemination strategy that I would be least inclined to use is that of memos in the form of posters. From experience, I find that this form of dissemination is regularly overlooked, even by myself. The facility where I work tends to resort to this form of announcement when there are meetings or required workshops. I find that information needs to be better passed along in this way. I am not sure if this is due to a lack of understanding or willingness. Melnyk et al. (2011) write that it is beneficial to first assess the organization’s or unit’s culture and readiness for evidence-based practice. This could be a reason why this form of dissemination is not effective at my place of work. Regardless, this strategy is one that I would only use after I have tried other techniques.

Barriers

According to Melnyk et al. (2017), barriers to evidence-based practice can include inadequate knowledge and skills of staff, misperceptions, organizational culture and policies, lack of support of leaders, and inadequate resources. The first strategy that I mentioned included staff meetings. One barrier that I have seen with these meetings is inadequate resources. Realistically, for each staff to have the opportunity to attend, there need to be multiple options for dates and times. This is rarely able to be done so there are always a few who miss out on the information. The other strategy that I mentioned is the group “huddle”. A barrier to this method of dissemination is that staff could be late for their shift, therefore missing this information as it is read the first thing at change of shift. Then, it is the responsibility of the charge nurse to relay this information to those staff members. This being said, Gallagher-Ford et al. (2011) write that there is no sustainable change to evidence-based practice with the dissemination of evidence alone, there needs to be reinforcement amongst the unit. So either way, extra effort is needed in the unit to ensure that the evidence-based practice information is implemented.

Conclusion

In conclusion, there are many strategies for dissemination that can be utilized to ensure that evidence-based practice techniques are implemented among organizations. This being said, there are certain strategies that are more favorable and effective than others. Most importantly, the unit and staff need to be willing to incorporate this into their workflow. There is also the issue of barriers that need to be considered when deciding on a strategy. Overall, evidence-based practice needs to be disseminated into practice in an effective way.


Evidence-based practice is an important aspect of healthcare delivery and there is an emphasis to continue implementing EBP in healthcare service provision. The two effective strategies that would be vital in disseminating evidence-based practice include the use of implementation guides and training (Dang et al., 2021). The implementation guides are handy in providing concise and clear instruction on the implementation of evidence-based practice including the pros and cons of implementation. For this reason, the guides ensure that the EBP is effectively implemented. Besides, the implementation guides may also provide strategies for overcoming barriers that may be encountered during the implementation process. The second strategy is training. The training may take the form of lectures, workshops, or seminars and may be tailored to the interest of the audience. Training may increase awareness of EBP among healthcare professionals and hence improve attitudes toward the implementation process.

Among the two strategies, I would incline more toward implementation guides. As stated in the paragraph above, the implementation guides provide clear instructions on how to implement EBP including the challenges that may be faced and how to overcome the challenges. Besides, implementation guides may be readily available for healthcare professionals wherever there is a need to refer to the instructions (Dang et al., 2021). Additionally, the implementation guides may further be used to train professionals who are new to the practice.

Implementation guides can be a useful tool for disseminating EBP and ensuring that they are implemented consistently and effectively. However, several potential barriers may arise when using implementation guides. One barrier is the availability of resources. Implementing EBP often requires additional resources such as training, equipment, or materials, and these resources may not always be readily available (Alatawi et al., 2020). This can make it difficult to implement the EBP as intended. For example, when dealing with a large number of professionals, it would be expensive and difficult to equip each individual with a copy of the implementation guide. For this reason, there would be a need to conduct training using the guides for information to reach many.  Another potential barrier is the complexity of the practice. Some EBP guides may be complex or require a significant amount of training or support to implement. This is true with the eldest professionals who may find it an uphill task to use the guides (Li, Ciao & Zhu, 2019).

To overcome these barriers that may arise when using implementation guides, it is important to identify and address resource needs, build support and buy-in from key stakeholders, provide training and support, and regularly evaluate and adapt the implementation plan as needed. By taking these steps, it can be easier to ensure that the EBP is implemented effectively as recommended.


Two dissemination strategies that l will use to communicate EBP will be the use of podium presentations and the use of poster presentations. I feel like this is one of the more effective ways to get across to a lot of people at the organizational level. The dissemination strategy that l would be least inclined to use will be publication in peer reviewed journals, this is because not everyone is open to reading peer reviewed journals. Effective presenters go beyond content expertise to connect with audiences through various technique, format and presentation and styles (Wood et al., 2017).

Two barriers one might encounter using the podium presentation and poster presentation might be a lack of feedback immediately. Another barrier might be poor eye contact if one is focused on looking at the notes the whole time, which might lead to a lack of connection with the audience. They also learned that it’s critical to have an organizational culture that supports EBP (such as evidence-based decision making into performance expectations, up-to-date resources and tools, ongoing EBP knowledge and skills-building workshops, and EBP mentors at the point of care) in order for clinicians to deliver evidence-based care (Melnyk et al., 2011).

How these barriers can be overcome by allowing more time during the presentations for questions and feedback whether positive or negative. The goal of scientific meetings is to share research findings and offer a podium for scientific debate. Preferably, research findings that are not published (yet) are presented and discussed. This not only serves as a platform for researchers to update their knowledge on several topics, but it also offers the presenting authors some kind of ‘peer-review’ prior to preparing the results for publication (Janssen et al, 2016).


Evidence-based research results become useful when proper dissemination and communication are done, and stakeholders are adequately informed about their benefits. Researchers can use several dissemination strategies to share their results with stakeholders (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018; Melnyk, 2012). The dissemination strategies that will most likely be used in the planned research are oral organizational-level presentations and poster presentations. According to Swathi (2017), oral presentations allow the presenter to emphasize the presented information. When well-structured, oral presentations make it easier for the listeners to follow.  As Arcila et al. (2022) explain, poster presentations improve communication experiences and enhance collaboration between researchers and the audience. Oral organizational-level presentations and poster presentations will enable the researchers to effectively share the results of implementing barcode medication administration (BCMA) technology with stakeholders.

The two dissemination strategies the research team will be less inclined to use are podium presentations at the national level and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Although these two strategies are effective dissemination strategies for reaching a large audience in different locations, they are costly to implement. It will take a long time for the desired audience to receive and use the information in practice (Chua et al., 2022). However, it is essential to note that the research team might still experience some barriers when using oral organizational-level presentations and poster presentations. For example, the team might face resistance from some audience members who may fail to attend the meeting, and it might be unable to include detailed information in the posters to enhance understanding (Swathi, 2017; Arcila et al., 2022). The best strategies to overcome the identified barriers include informing the audience about the importance of the presentation in advance and developing short but precise posters that contain clear and relevant information.


Evidence-based practice involves the integration of clinical expertise with evidence derived from research, while taking into account the resources available and the preferences of patients (Renolen et al., 2019). It is essential to utilize evidence-based practice to disseminate information in the clinical setting. Dissemination in healthcare organizations involves distributing information and evidence-based resources or interventions to a group of people in clinical practice. Dissemination is an active approach to spreading evidence-based interventions to the target audience via predetermined channels using planned strategies (Knoepke et al., 2019). The purpose of dissemination is to communicate essential healthcare information to enable healthcare professionals to make effective clinical decisions based on evidence-based practice and improve healthcare outcomes.

There are a number of effective dissemination strategies that can be used to communicate vital information to target audiences in order to improve healthcare. Dissemination of data can be done in different ways, including publications, in-person or virtual meetings, webinars, and online resources. In order to determine the dissemination strategy that should be used, it is important to understand the target audience. The in-person meeting would be one of the strategies I would use in my clinical area. I find this strategy to be very useful in that it facilitates an interactive session and allows for feedback to be received from the audience. By using this strategy, the target audience is able to ask questions and gain a greater understanding of the information presented. In my role as an infection prevention specialist at my workplace, I have had opportunities to schedule meetings with different departments to discuss infection prevention strategies that can help mitigate the spread of infections. By using this strategy, the staff and patients are able to ask questions to clarify the information received. In this COVID-19 outbreak, my infection prevention team and I have successfully disseminated vital evidence-based information regarding how to protect employees and patients from the virus, proper use of personal protective equipment, and proper hand hygiene and disinfection techniques in order to prevent the spread of the virus. The use of posters and other essential publications is another effective dissemination strategy. Posters providing information about effective clinical practices are displayed in strategic locations throughout the facility in order to make sure that patients and employees are aware of the most vital information. Both staff and patients can access the information displayed on these posters in the units. Due to the fact that not everyone has access to social media or online resources, I am less likely to use social media or online dissemination strategies. This strategy reduces the progression of the dissemination of information and defeats its purpose.

There are several barriers that can prevent dissemination strategies from being effective. Lack of continuing education and unsupportive culture are significant barriers to dissemination (Owoade, n.d.). Sometimes the management does not provide adequate supports for the dissemination process by sponsoring the production of materials and resources needed for the meetings and posters to be displayed. When this situation occurs, the dissemination process can be delayed, which can have a negative impact on the outcome. It is also important to acknowledge that one of the barriers to the dissemination of evidence-based practices is a lack of knowledge among healthcare professionals about them. Some clinicians find it challenging to participate actively in information dissemination due to a lack of research and understanding of EBP. In my opinion, to enhance the dissemination of evidence-based practice, the organization must develop a supportive culture and system to facilitate the process.


Change is a good thing, but it is hard to get people to practice change without supporting evidence, especially in healthcare. Getting people to buy into what you’re promoting is the key to facilitating change based on evidence-based practice (EBP). The main goal in the dissemination of evidence is to promote the transfer and adoption of research findings into clinical practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Evidence-based practice changes need to be supported by the dissemination of evidence.  

     There are many ways to present research evidence findings. My favorite in the hospital-based setting is a poster presentation. I am a member of the Pressure Injury Prevention (PIP) team and Wound Care team and have made several posters and presented them regarding the prevention of pressure injuries and care of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). I prefer poster presentations because they offer direct and concise information. I also like the posters because I include pictures as a visual representation. Another way to disseminate evidence is through small groups in clinical rounds. This could be accomplished during a shift huddle by presenting a brief and detailed outline and oral presentation. This method allows for the meaningful involvement of the clinical staff (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).  

     Dissemination is an art, just as nursing is. Careful communication of clinical, research, and theoretical findings are needed to transition new knowledge to clinical practice (Dudley-Brown, 2019). One barrier of poster presentations is getting information presented to all staff. Several meetings will need to be scheduled in order to accommodate all shifts and employees. Another barrier is where should the poster be placed after the presentation to gain the most viewers. I have found near the time clock to be an effective place, if approval is gained by management. Barriers to the small group clinical rounds is a lack of engagement by staff members and time constraints. Some staff members are just not interested in learning new information, no matter what the evidence indicates.  

     The dissemination route that I would least be inclined to use is evidence through a published article. I lack knowledge and confidence in this arena and feel that I can better affect change at the clinical, hands-on level. Research that lacks dissemination may be considered useless in influencing positive health outcomes. One strategy to avoid barriers to EBP change is to identify and involve key stakeholders during the research design and discussion (Derman & Jaeger, 2018). When looking to affect change in the healthcare setting, always do your research and know your audience.  


EBP Dissemination Strategies:  Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use
Dissemination can be described as getting information to the public covering a large area (MeInyk & Overholt, 2018). There are many ways of dissemination strategies. Some common ones are policy briefs, journal articles, press releases, presenting to stakeholders, building a flyer or DVD, submitting information to a newspaper, and health fairs. I am not a public speaker, so I would be least likely to speak at a press release or create a DVD. I am visual, so creating a flyer or hosting a health fair would be more of my forte and, I believe, more informative to learners. But in the end, I believe it would depend on what you were trying to accomplish and how widespread you were trying to make it (Rural Health Information Hub, n.d.).

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies
Barriers associated with a flyer and health fair could be the geographical location, how can I get people to come from afar to my health fair, and how can I get my information out there, widespread to just more than my town, county, community, etc. How do I get people to travel from a distance to receive this information? Another barrier would be the resources, such as funding for the health fair and the supplies needed. One should also take into consideration workers for the project of flyer development and getting it out there to the public. Funding would also be needed to advertise the health fair (Rural Health Information Hub, n.d.).

Overcoming Identified Barriers
One way to overcome the barriers would be to know my audience and whom I am trying to reach and get this information. It is essential to know the benefits and risks of the projects as well. There is also a need to ensure that the information provided is attractive and attention-seeking to the population (Brownson, Eyler, Harris, Moore, & Tabak, 2018). Connecting with people from afar to help get information, such as the flyer out there, and spreading the word for advertisements relating to the health fair would be beneficial. Lastly, stressing the need for funding to stakeholders for flyers and health fairs to present the information is another key to success.


Two dissemination strategies that would be most inclined to use

When effectively disseminating articles effective communication and transdisciplinary teamwork have been shown through evidence-based research to improve quality care. If management and staff are communicating effectively and are focused on the same goals the organization can identify potential risks, and errors, and prevent them before they occur. When organizations are listening effectively and responding to their staff’s insights, this will improve safety and quality (Melnyk, 2012).

The second strategy that has shown to be effective is training organizations and stakeholders about the importance of evidence-based training and implementing it. There will be times when staff does not agree and do not want change. When you start at the top of an organization, and you train; stakeholders must be engaged (Gallagher-Ford et al, 2011).  Stakeholders must understand the objective and logic behind it. You need to have someone who knows the research and is trustworthy when educating. Staff must feel they can ask questions and have honest feedback.

Least inclined dissemination strategies to be used.

To facilitate change in an organization there needs to be a well-formulated strategic plan along with vision and belief. Two dissemination strategies that can be detrimental to an organization are allowing change efforts to fail due to focus and energy being placed on the late majority and laggards. This needs to be focused on the stakeholder that is excited about the change. Another dissemination strategy that would like less to be used would be a podium presentation for training. These usually have time limits of 15 to 20 minutes and public speaking can be uncomfortable for some presenters (Melnyk & Fineout- Overholt, 2018)

Barriers to be encountered and overcoming these barriers

A major barrier in evidence-based practice among facilitators and healthcare organizations is a lack of knowledge to change health behaviors. To overcome these barriers different strategies, need to use such as coaching, training, and text messages. The effectiveness of these interventions included frequency, follow-up time, and intensity (Chapman, et al. 2020). If uninterested staff is a barrier, then look at the audience and see what presentation would involve them and involve them in the presentation.


Developing A Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

            The evidence-based practice (EBP) enhances healthcare quality, improves patient outcomes, reduces costs, and empowers clinicians. This is also known as a quadruple aim in healthcare. (Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). 

EBP Dissemination Strategies: Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

The dissemination strategies are categorized into two types: internal and external. The internal dissemination takes the form of a brief project summary in a newsletter, blog, or the internet, where other clinicians get updates on their practice. External dissemination includes a poster, podium presentation at conferences, or publication in a journal. Social media is also included in this category. The central social media platforms include Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. I’m inclined to use external dissemination rather than internal, mainly social media. Because I use social media as a stress-relief mechanism, I have almost zero barriers to approaching this platform. What I like about this platform is that I can open up my apps, scroll down on the pages, and get immediate updates. The immediate feedback on the most incredible restaurants, updates from my friends, and updates on healthcare professionals and organizations I follow are genuinely pleasurable. It makes work more enjoyable. This leaves internal dissemination to be least inclined to use. Internal dissemination requires efforts on my end, the steps to log in to a newsletter and follow up on blogs or professional organization websites to get an update. This effort is a barrier to getting quick updates on recent practice updates. (Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018).

 Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies

Nurses should practice the EBP process as care that is not evidence-based is likely unethical and incompetent. Incorporating EBP into practice has been shown to promote optimal patient outcomes, stimulate innovation in clinical practice, and promote the value of the nursing profession in the healthcare system. However, there remains to be a gap and barriers to EBP in nurses. The overwhelming amount of evidence findings in the research is one factor to the barrier, but also human factors, including lack of knowledge about EBP and skills needed to conduct EBP, nurses’ negative attitude toward research, and evidence-based care make up other barriers. Last but not least, the barrier of lack of organizational systems or infrastructure to support clinicians using EBP. Causes for barriers in this category include lack of authority for clinicians to make changes in practice, lack of time during the workday, lack of administrative support, and conflicting priorities between unit work and research. (Milner., K. (n.d.).

Overcoming Identified Barriers

           The three main components of evidence-based practice include utilizing the best external evidence, drawing on individual clinical expertise, and considering patient values and expectations. (The Role of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing. (2020, August 19). Implementing the EPB requires interdisciplinary professionals to collaborate as a team. The healthcare organization should provide a culture and environment to build and promote EBP. For example, by giving clinicians ladders and performance evaluations incorporating EBP. Another way to resolve the barrier includes the Federal funding of EBP centers and task forces to appraise evidence to screen and manage clinical practice guidelines. They could address the issues posed by the barriers and help resolve the problem. (Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018).


EBP Dissemination Strategies:  Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

I believe the most effective and realistic approach to educating nursing staff on evidence-based practice is to present a topic in a combination of shift change huddle presentations using narrative pedagogy, along with self-instructional mandatory modules related to the topic. Narrative pedagogy is an approach used by a speaker who is using a personal story to present a topic that triggers the audience’s empathy and interest (Walter, 2022). To ensure that the information was properly communicated, a mandatory module containing the most important details of the presentation should be assigned to staff, as self-instructional modules are proven to increase the knowledge of evidence-based practice in nursing (Nandaprakash et al., 2019)

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies

Unfortunately, shift change huddles are very short (Approximately 20 minutes). It is possible to implement a narrative pedagogy presentation to trigger empathy and interest from the audience, however distractions such as staff coming in late due to a grace period of a clock-in would stand in a way of fully achieving the goal. Without the audience’s full interest and empathy, educational modules tend to be met with resistance from the audience (Walter, 2022).

Overcoming Identified Barriers

Informing the staff of the scheduled presentation by the speaker to ensure all staff is present at a specific strict time at the start of the grace period for clock-in. Short and interesting storytelling which includes evidence-based practice can be easily done during a 20-minute huddle without distractions, therefore staff participation and respect for the speaker are necessary to overcome this barrier of lack of time for education (Schneider, 2023). It is extremely important for the speaker to prepare the presentation for the audience with objectives triggering audience interest in order to effectively use the narrative pedagogy technique in such a short amount of time. Effectively capturing the audience’s interest would prompt a positive attitude to read and comprehend information from the module ensuring effective evidence base practice education has been successfully implemented.


EBP Dissemination Strategies: Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

           Culture and technology are two areas of healthcare that makes healthcare to be constantly changing. Culture is defined as learned patterns of behavior and values ​​practiced through social interaction, shared by members of a particular group, and transmitted from generation to generation (Baker, 2020). Cultures are diverse, and healthcare professionals must be open to the values ​​and beliefs of others in order to provide the best possible care for each patient. A person’s culture influences their life experiences and, therefore, their perceptions of health, illness, and treatment (Baker, 2020). One of the things I have learned during my long career as a nurse is that as a nurse, you need to learn and understand the cultural contexts of others which helps to facilitate communication and helps create an effective nurse-patient relationship (Baker, 2020). We learn about cultures through education and training, but the best way to learn is from patients as we work with them to determine the best course of treatment and care.

Along with culture, the technology significantly impacts the healthcare sector, increasing opportunities to provide the best possible care to patients. Not only does it help patients learn more about their health, but it also facilitates care collaboration between providers and medical professionals. Increasing culture and technology in everyday life, along with evidence-based medicine, has put the patient in the treatment plan; because the treatment plan is about the patient and must continue after discharge, it makes sense to let them participate. Optimal patient care requires a combination of evidence-based medicine and patient communication (Hoffman et al., 2014).

           At my current job, we seek to incorporate all patients’ values and beliefs into treatment plans by asking for their input, making it difficult to describe an experience. I work in a crisis stabilization center. Many patients are in a mental health crisis when they come to the hospital, and many of them are not at a level where they can decide on a treatment policy at the time of their visit, so the staff begins to develop a treatment plan themselves. It is best not to include the patient in the treatment plan because they are mentally unstable at this time. When the patient is more stable, we bring them in and include them in the planning process. Research shows that patients who participate in health care decisions are more likely to continue to make those decisions after they leave the hospital, which is our facility’s belief. A Nurse Practitioner sees each patient on the care team daily to review the patient’s medications, general condition, and post-discharge care plan. They involve patients in discussions about medication regimens that help or may help improve their mental health, which is reasonable to follow. Ask the patient to create a safety plan to refer to if they are in crisis again. We do not decide for the patient but let them choose the best for their life. Another part of the treatment plan that includes them is the treatment follow-up plan. We assisted them in looking for the phone number of providers in their local area, but they chose which provider to call and book a follow-up. I have seen that this brings better results. Their participation helps us understand their values ​​and beliefs along the way. Patients have the right to be involved in their treatment plans, and we, as providers, try to involve them in all decisions as much as possible.

     The least dissemination strategy used is posters. This is because many of the patients admitted to the center are in mental crisis and might not fully understand the poster. For example, schizophrenia patients might interpret the poster as people trying to get them or even someone watching them, which might hinder their treatment and thus defeat the poster’s purpose.

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies

           Incorporating patient preferences and values ​​does not always lead to the best results. What the provider feels is the right course of action to treat someone, together with clinical expertise, has been effective (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). A patient may disagree with this course of treatment. For example, schizophrenia patients do not believe in drugs for some reason, which may lead to frequent readmission due to the return of symptoms. When discharged, they stop taking medication, against medical advice, thus ending up in another hospitalization. Therefore, when planning a treatment plan, we need to think outside the box and find ways for patients to seek help before they are hospitalized, like symptoms or clues to watch out for. I chose Patient Decision Support for Panic Attacks (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2019). Besides schizophrenia, there are often patients who do not want to take medicine. This help provides information about the disease and the medicines needed to treat it. It explains what to expect and what will happen if you do not take medication to treat it. It also explains why healthcare provider recommends medications, what medications are available, and what medications are

used as treatments, and shares other patient personal stories about their thoughts and decisions on medication. Patients’ thoughts and decisions about taking these aids give you a complete view of all aspects of the disease so that you can make an informed decision about any issue. 

 Overcoming Identified Barriers

As nurses, we know and are taught that patient education is one of the most important things we do as nurses. These aids can be used as educational tools to present facts to patients. This helps patients to be informed about their care and make confident decisions. This tool can be used in our personal life to deal with our health care and the problems of loved ones. The website provided by The Ottawa Hospital Decision Support Resources has a lot of valuable and educational information to share with others.


Introduction 

Evidence dissemination aims to inform and spread a comprehensive understanding of the best available research to motivate the uptake of evidence-based practice by increasing people’s ability to use and apply the best available evidence across geographical locations, healthcare settings, and social networks (AHRQ, 2019). The targeted population includes healthcare consumers, professionals, and policy developers. Therefore, it is essential to interpret evidence into a comprehensible language that meets the targeted population literacy level. Delivering concise, timely, relevant information that is accessible keeps the targeted population engaged for a more effective translation of information (Ashcraft et al., 2020; Chapman et al., 2020). According to the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (2019), a multifaced approach is the most effective.

EBP Dissemination Strategies: Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

           I am most inclined to use two strategies: infographics/posters and presentations. Infographics can be printed and posted anywhere and provide timely and concise information; it also provides generalizable images and statistics that reach a broader audience and are still valuable for individuals with impairments. Presentations are good because it is multifaced. Presentations and meetings allow for audience interaction and able to answer questions or concerns. Presentations and meetings can also assist in communicating decision-making facilitation strategies regarding evidence. 

The least likely strategies would be emailing communication and social platforms. Emailing communications are often overlooked, misplaced, or never received due to connectivity and storage issues per experience. For example, organizations send multiple emails daily, which can be overstimulating and causes information overload. Social platforms can also be overstimulating as information is added 24/7, and individuals are always utilizing bits and pieces of information, making it difficult for the audience to decipher between facts and misleading information (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt,2019).

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies

Barriers would include having individuals with different literacy levels and needing help to tailor the information for everyone. Other issues with presentations and meetings would be technical issues, and not all individuals being able to attend.     

Overcoming Identified Barriers

One way to address the previously mentioned barriers would be to provide presentations for a specific audience to meet their characteristics and make it relatable. For example, presenting to healthcare providers, then a different day for healthcare consumers to avoid medical jargon. For presentations and meetings ensuring to have a backup plan for incase of any technical issues (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). To ensure everyone gets the meeting’s exact information, a meeting information email can be sent or provide flexibility for multiple days for individuals to attend. To conclude, to be successful in disseminating evidence-based research one must be knowledgeable of the pros and cons or each strategy to prepare for barrier ahead of time. Another thing one must consider is the setting and guidelines to follow for each strategy.   


Introduction

Groundbreaking clinical breakthroughs and new evidence will only be able to reach their maximum potential and value to practice if it is communicated to other healthcare professionals and properly disseminated. There are many strategies of dissemination that can allow the communication of evidence-based findings (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This discussion will review the most and least inclined dissemination strategies, potential barriers, and how to overcome them. 

Dissemination Strategies Most Inclined to Use

One dissemination strategy I would be most inclined to use would be poster presentations. In addition to printed posters, poster presentations have evolved to include electronic poster presentations, which can be displayed via wide-screen monitors or computers (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Being a visual person that is not accustomed to public speaking, I like the idea of creatively presenting the information on a visual poster, allowing participants to review and process the information at their own pace and being available if they have any questions or want to discuss any key points. 

Another dissemination strategy I would be inclined to use would be through small group formats, such as clinical or grand rounds. These presentations include a small oral presentation with audiovisual slides or videos and a question-and-answer period. Internet-based grand rounds are interesting to me because it is a smaller amount of people vs a podium presentation, and internet-based rounds can enable participants to attend the presentation remotely. In addition, participants can email questions or comments (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

 Dissemination Strategies Least Inclined to Use

One dissemination strategy that I am least inclined to use is panel presentations. A moderator coordinates panel presentations, directs the discussions, and asks questions to panelists to elicit their opinions on topics. Questions from the audience can be taken (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). I would not choose this type of dissemination strategy because I do not prefer public speaking, and many factors can change the presentation’s direction. In addition, there are many things to consider while being a panelist, such as time limitations, interruptions, and possible tangential remarks, which seem stressful to me. 

Another dissemination strategy that I am least inclined to use is podium presentations. Podium presentations, otherwise known as oral presentations, can be an excellent way to disseminate information. Generally, podium presentations have time limits and vary from 10 minutes to up to an hour and can include visual slides (Redulla, 2023). Although podium presentations can be a benefit, public speaking can be very uncomfortable for me, which is why I am least inclined to select this method of dissemination. 

Recognizing and Overcoming Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies

The design of poster presentations should be well thought out. Content-dense posters can be ineffective and difficult to read; on the other hand, too little information can also be damaging as it can limit the study’s potential. Poorly designed posters can be detrimental and lead participants away. One strategy to overcome this issue is considering bullet points instead of much solid text, ensuring text is as concise and clear as possible, and focusing on key points (Saver, 2021).  

Barriers to dissemination through small groups, if done in the hospital, can be time constraints. One strategy mentioned by Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2018) to overcome this issue is to do a internet-based rounds, which enable participants to attend at their convenience. 


EBP Dissemination Strategies:  Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

The dissemination of research-specific practices to clinical settings or public health is integral to the evidence-based practices (EBP) that nurses are responsible for implementing. However, the most current evidence-based practices (EBPs) will be successfully applied once they are widely disseminated and conveyed (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). The term “evidence-based practice” (EBP) refers to a problem-solving approach to healthcare delivery that integrates clinical expertise, patient values and preferences, and the most up-to-date scientific data (Gallagher-Ford et al., 2011). However, the most up-to-date evidence-based practices (EBPs) will be widely adopted once they are widely shared and conveyed (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). According to Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2018), dissemination makes knowledge widely available or circulated. Several context-specific measures may be used to assess the efficacy of efforts to disseminate evidence-based practice.

Dissemination Strategies

If I were to disseminate knowledge, I would prioritize two methods: a unit-level presentation and a poster presentation. Using unit-level presentations, advocating for possibilities, and including challenges in practice are made more manageable, casual, and cost less. Every week, we have meetings to discuss updates with the facility or any updates in healthcare. New rules and procedures, anticipated surveyor visits, administration follow-ups, and HAI-related indicators for our unit will all be discussed during these meetings. Nurses often cite knowledge, skills, time, and resources as barriers to evidence-based practice (EBP) (Hagedorn-Wonder & York, 2017). By coming together in these meetings, we can discuss any issues that may arise, learn from each other’s experiences, and improve our unit and the care we provide to our patients.

Disseminating evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge via poster presentations is another low-cost, casual way. Healthcare providers, clinicians, and nursing students of varying educational levels, experience levels, and specializations may collaborate via a poster presentation (Humbles, 2019). When presented on a poster, material may be read and absorbed at the participant’s own pace, which can be very beneficial. Most people in the healthcare industry are visual and kinesthetic learners; therefore, they prefer to know what is shown graphically instead of hearing it spoken orally. Unlike a unit-level presentation, a poster on spreading EBP allows for a wide range of concerns to be covered. For instance, in the facility where I used to work, we have a communication board that posts updates on CLABSI data (CLABSI). Recently, a poster was created to illustrate how the biopatch may be used effectively to prevent skin organisms from accessing the insertion site and causing blood infections. Staff attention was drawn to the importance of this process in reducing preventable CLABSIs by demonstrating the patch’s continuous antisepsis and correct application.

Dissemination Strategies Least Likely to Use, Why

Among the strategies available, a national-level presentation is the one I use the least. Since I am not presently engaged in any programs or research at the national level that would entail generating new evidence-based practices, this is the level of the presentation I am least likely to undertake.

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies and How to Overcome

Participation and time constraints are potential obstacles to utilizing a poster and giving presentations at the unit level. Although presentations at the unit level are often given at the weekly meeting, they take place at the start of the meeting. Having many well-advertised presentations at the unit level at different times of the day might help overcome this obstacle. Providing the demonstration as an ePoster through email or a necessary learning assignment would be a barrier to overcoming the time restrictions and lack of employee involvement in a poster presentation. While the ePoster would allow employees to study the presentation at their convenience, the anticipated learning assignment would ensure and recognize that they had done so. As a result, the ePoster would serve as a magnet to draw people in and encourage engagement via the further discourse of information sharing that forms the foundation of community debate (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

Conclusion

Spreading EBP may be done via several different methods. Technology may have made healthcare delivery more efficient, but that does not mean doctors and nurses cannot still share evidence that helps their colleagues and the community give better treatment. Although challenges may arise, presenters must always be well-prepared and aware of the demands of their audience if they want their study to be accepted and put into practice. 


EBP Dissemination Strategies

The conundrum of healthcare today is based on the quality of patient care, costs of care for patients and facilities, staff satisfaction and positive outcomes for the patients. One of the most important ways to positively effect these issues is best practice measures through evidence-based practice (Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Ellen Fineout-Overholt &, 2018). In a large facility setting, making sure everyone is on board for the best outcomes is a difficult task. It is the job of the executive team down to the staff on the front lines to disseminate the EBP in a manner that is well received by all.

Most Likely Dissemination Strategies Inclined to Use 

Electronics and people are almost inseparable. We are on our phones for directions, scrolling through social media, utilizing electronic medical records for ourselves and at work, it is in our cars with the push of a button. Social Media is the first dissemination strategy that I believe to be useful to communicate evidenced-based practice to our teams. “The percentage of US adults who use at least 1 social media tool has grown from near 0% in 2005 to 69% in 2016,62 and there is little difference in social media use by race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, or community type” (Brownson et al., 2018). We use a platform called Crew to communicate between our five surgical services units. When we initially started utilizing this platform there was push back from several staff members. Many stated they did not want to be bothered when they were not at work with work issues. We held a class to teach those who were skeptical about the platform how to silence notifications. We set boundaries and expectations for what this should be use for. It has turned out to be a great place for our educators to post information about practice change and outcomes. It gives the teams the opportunity to discuss and discover together on their own times. This has been a positive way for our educators and leaders to get our EBP in a timely fashion.

Everyone seems to be busy and always on the go. Adding one more mandatory meeting to learn about a new EBP roll out really brings down staff morale and helps to increase burnout. Another creative way we have found to disseminate EBP is with a what’s new at the facility HealthStream. There is no test at the end, and it cannot be more than five slides. When there is a practice change that requires a check off, we have a skills lab set up that is staffed with an educator during the day for questions and concerns. The staff can do a self-check off and the educators are there to assist if needed. Durning the evening hours, if a staff member cannot complete the skill or has questions or concerns, they may set up an appointment with an educator. This process has been a win for the staff and educators.                                                                       

Barriers to Strategies

There are many barriers to get nurses to utilize evidence-based practice including lack of knowledge about what EBP actually is, fear of not understanding and working differently than their co-workers, too much information and time constraints (Melnyk, 2002). The time constraint barriers with the strategies I utilize are the ability for the staff to learn on their own time. They also have access to the educators to answer questions and assist with any new techniques in private without having to feel less than in front of their peers.

                                                     

EBP Dissemination Strategies

The conundrum of healthcare today is based on the quality of patient care, costs of care for patients and facilities, staff satisfaction and positive outcomes for the patients. One of the most important ways to positively effect these issues is best practice measures through evidence-based practice (Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Ellen Fineout-Overholt &, 2018). In a large facility setting, making sure everyone is on board for the best outcomes is a difficult task. It is the job of the executive team down to the staff on the front lines to disseminate the EBP in a manner that is well received by all.

Most Likely Dissemination Strategies Inclined to Use 

Electronics and people are almost inseparable. We are on our phones for directions, scrolling through social media, utilizing electronic medical records for ourselves and at work, it is in our cars with the push of a button. Social Media is the first dissemination strategy that I believe to be useful to communicate evidenced-based practice to our teams. “The percentage of US adults who use at least 1 social media tool has grown from near 0% in 2005 to 69% in 2016,62 and there is little difference in social media use by race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, or community type” (Brownson et al., 2018). We use a platform called Crew to communicate between our five surgical services units. When we initially started utilizing this platform there was push back from several staff members. Many stated they did not want to be bothered when they were not at work with work issues. We held a class to teach those who were skeptical about the platform how to silence notifications. We set boundaries and expectations for what this should be use for. It has turned out to be a great place for our educators to post information about practice change and outcomes. It gives the teams the opportunity to discuss and discover together on their own times. This has been a positive way for our educators and leaders to get our EBP in a timely fashion.

Everyone seems to be busy and always on the go. Adding one more mandatory meeting to learn about a new EBP roll out really brings down staff morale and helps to increase burnout. Another creative way we have found to disseminate EBP is with a what’s new at the facility HealthStream. There is no test at the end, and it cannot be more than five slides. When there is a practice change that requires a check off, we have a skills lab set up that is staffed with an educator during the day for questions and concerns. The staff can do a self-check off and the educators are there to assist if needed. Durning the evening hours, if a staff member cannot complete the skill or has questions or concerns, they may set up an appointment with an educator. This process has been a win for the staff and educators.

Barriers to Strategies

There are many barriers to get nurses to utilize evidence-based practice including lack of knowledge about what EBP actually is, fear of not understanding and working differently than their co-workers, too much information and time constraints (Melnyk, 2002). The time constraint barriers with the strategies I utilize are the ability for the staff to learn on their own time. They also have access to the educators to answer questions and assist with any new techniques in private without having to feel less than in front of their peers.

 

Least Likely to Use Dissemination Strategies

There are several outdated practices to disseminating EBP. Two strategies that I am least likely to utilize include staff meetings and having poster boards in the break room. Staff meetings are once a month. We do not require staff to come to the meetings in person. They have the option to call in and are only required to attend seventy percent of the meetings. The meetings are usually before a shift given time constraints to rolling out the new practice. The posterboard technique is a disservice to the person that makes it and the team. It is usually in the way or shoved in the corner of a breakroom, and with staffing shortages most do not want to read and learn on their breaks.

Least Likely to Use Dissemination Strategies          There are several outdated practices to disseminating EBP. Two strategies that I am least likely to utilize include staff meetings and having poster boards in the break room. Staff meetings are once a month. We do not require staff to come to the meetings in person. They have the option to call in and are only required to attend seventy percent of the meetings. The meetings are usually before a shift given time constraints to rolling out the new practice. The posterboard technique is a disservice to the person that makes it and the team. It is usually in the way or shoved in the corner of a breakroom, and with staffing shortages most do not want to read and learn on their breaks.


Strategies for effective dissemination of evidence-based practice models            

                A successful evidence-based practice (EBP) program requires dedication and commitment. Staff must have structured time to develop the EBP skills and competencies they plan to implement. Some ways to disseminate EBP skills and information are rapid cycle training, one or two-day seminars, multidisciplinary groups, and team mentoring. (Newhouse, 2011) Other practical tools are job descriptions and performance evaluation tools. When onboarding, make the evidence-based practice goals known in the job description. Write performance evaluations and weight merit increases based on EBP competencies. (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019) There is a need for managers and leaders to have accountability for EBP. You will have more followers leading by example versus verbal statements.

Most inclined to use barriers

                I have taught American Heart Association courses for nearly 20 years. The material is evidence supported and reviewed annually.  The courses use video resources, but I enjoy presenting the material in small group settings. It is engaging to allow the class to ask questions and present scenarios staged in their current practice settings. It allows the learner to relate to an event, and then it is easy to incorporate evidence-based guidelines in their day-to-day practice. The teamwork and collaboration between the different disciplines are positive. One of the barriers to this type of dissemination is always someone trying to hijack the training. They know more and have done more, and of course, “this is how we have always done it.”  To overcome this mentality, I always have a current peer or committee-reviewed studies available for discussion.
Speaking from a director of the nursing viewpoint, I like the leadership strategies of using job performance evaluation tools. I disseminate EBP material monthly in a webinar team meeting for the 50-plus nursing staff within our organization and then follow the interactive meeting with a team web post of the written materials. A barrier to this method is getting staff to read and review the materials. The specific competencies are outlined in the material, and a verbal or visual demonstration of the outlined competency is required with a scoring system between one and four, with one being the lowest rating and full retraining of the skill needed and four showing full independent competency. Adding a rating scale and having a verbal or visual demonstration reduces the barrier that staff will read the material.

Least inclined to use
I would be least inclined to use a library source or lengthy seminar to disseminate the material. It would be difficult to hold the staff’s attention for a lengthy period. I think most people learn by more than one method, and the combination of verbal, visual, and hands-on learning aid in retaining the material.

Sustainability of EBP
An organizational-level EBP model can aid in the job satisfaction of staff and better patient outcomes. (Melnyk et al. 2011) Many like the comfort in best practice guidelines to support decisions.


EBP Dissemination Strategies:  Most Inclined to Use

Distribution refers to the act of distributing, delivering, distributing, spreading, or dispersing. Broadcasting information to the general public in the medical field is important. Dissemination is a key information strategy designed to raise awareness of some evidence-based interventions to increase their effectiveness. Among the many recognized dissemination strategies, I would rather use social media. In today’s modern world, the use of social media to disseminate health research is increasing exponentially. With this tool, you can expand your reach, drive engagement, and have easy access to authoritative health research.

EBP Dissemination Strategies:  Least Likely to Use

The least utilized dissemination strategy is leaflets and posters. Presentations and PowerPoint presentations. While these methods are recognized as being particularly effective in disseminating information, they may not be effective in disseminating some important information to different audiences. For example, posters and brochures can be difficult to correct and adjust as needed. Its inflexibility can be misleading to the audience because it cannot be changed or adjusted (jog). Methods, on the other hand, are meant to be visually prominent. In this case, the audience may select the wrong information instead of the intended information, therefore they may be inappropriate.

Overcoming Identified Barriers

While social media may be my preferred strategy for disseminating evidence-based information and practical information, there are obstacles related to the process. For example, the effectiveness of your social media distribution depends on how many followers your page has.  Dissemination is effective when the audience is large enough and information can be shared and re-shared. On the other hand, using social media dissemination strategies can be problematic depending on the type of audience receiving the information. Since the platform has a large number of random users, it is not known whether the information will reach the target audience (Bhatt et al., 2021).


EBP Dissemination Strategies:  Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

Throughout this course, we have learned a lot about research and how evidence is derived from research. In our daily work as nurses, we use evidence-based interventions to care for our patients. The missing link: How does the evidence obtained from research gets disseminated and implemented into regular practice? Disseminating is described as “The process of distributing or circulating information widely.” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018, p. 752). When a change in practice is implemented, its success is built upon the initial dissemination of the new practice guidelines and why the new practice is being implemented. I have done several projects in my healthcare career that involved implementing a practice change. One project was a change to bedside handoff when I was an Emergency Room nurse. To implement the practice change, the team that I was a part of creating an information board that highlighted why the change was being implemented, including evidence that showed that it is a safer practice. The change in practice was also discussed in staff meetings and in the morning staff safety huddle. At the time that I worked on this project, I was a relatively newer nurse. It was rewarding to be a part of a practice change that improved patient safety.

When I was an ER Tech (my first job in healthcare), I was on a team that was made up of various ER staff members that were attempting to increase patient satisfaction in our department. Our team met monthly to discuss how our implemented strategies were working, and to plan new interventions. Members of the team volunteered to make presentations that would introduce the new interventions to the staff. I was the speaker at a ceremony that highlighted the increased patient satisfaction numbers that were achieved during the first year of the new patient satisfaction team. It was rewarding to be a part of this team and the one that implemented bedside handoff in the ER. I enjoyed collaborating with members of our ER staff, nurses, and management.

In the first project I mentioned, the team used presentation boards, face-to-face interactions, smaller meetings, and larger staff meetings to disseminate information about the new practice. The second project that I mentioned incorporated presentation boards that we displayed in our staff break room, information posted on staff communication boards, email communication, and staff meetings to disseminate a new strategy to improve patient satisfaction. The changes that each of these groups implemented were for one unit in the hospital, and not the entire hospital or health system. The meetings and presentations that we used to disseminate information seemed to work well for the type of changes that we were making.

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies

The main barrier that I encountered with both of these projects was resistance from my colleagues. Another issue was time constraints. In the ER there is not usually much free time to have meetings, develop presentations, and talk with the staff about the practice change(s) that are occurring.

Overcoming Identified Barriers

 Resistance to change seems to be a common human trait, and healthcare is no exception. For both of the projects I mentioned, it was important to have the support of the leadership team in the department. Leadership is an important factor in the success of a practice change (Newhouse et al., 2007). Management supported the changes that were being made and helped to reinforce the importance of the new practice(s).

The other barrier that we had to overcome was time. Change takes time to plan and implement. The teams that I was a part of met mostly during work hours. Then, implementing change in a busy ER has many challenges as well. This added to the time that it took to fully roll out practice changes. This is where leadership helped, but taking any opportunity (such as morning huddles) to discuss the changes that were being made was important. Also, patience and flexibility with the time it took to implement change were key. Melnyk (2015) says that even in the best-case scenario, it can take years to implement a practice change. I learned this lesson when attempting to implement bedside shift reports in the ER. That change began when I was new to that ER, and by the end of my two and half years there, bedside shift report was part of regular practice.


EBP Dissemination Strategies 

Evidence based practice has the potential of improving patient care if the stakeholders are well informed and are receptive to the changes, this is emphasized well by Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2018), when healthcare providers use research and evidence based-practice to guide patient care as opposed to tradition and outdated hospital policies and guidelines, patients tend to get the best care. Being able to disseminate and ensure that all healthcare providers are on the same page with the latest EBP is what makes the big difference. Some dissemination strategies tend to work better than others and, in this discussion, I am going to dwell on both. 

Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use Dissemination Strategies 

I will use an example of implementing a new fall assessment tool to an organization. A combination of system wide emails and daily hurdles done by unit managers and charge nurses to disseminate the new fall assessment tool, this can further be reinforced by having training modules assigned to each staff with room for staff to meet with educators to illustrate or answer any questions that staff may have. 

The strategy that I will not likely use is just posting the new assessment tool on the company website alone expecting staff to be able to discover and read with no room for in person clarification. 

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies 

Depending on the size of the organization, some staff members work off shift schedules or are part time and do not get to benefit from daily hurdles especially due to their brief nature or the time they are done. Sometimes lack of good leadership as within organizations requires strong infrastructure, including nursing leadership and human and material resource 

Overcoming Identified Barriers 

To overcome some of the barriers, organization leaders need to engage in better communication strategies, collaborate with staff members, identify that human is to err but patient safety is paramount. Melnyk. (2012). To effectively disseminate EBP requires, strong infrastructure, including nursing leadership and human and material resource. For healthcare organizations to change and embrace EBP, they nature the culture of EBP and have mentors who can help guide the rest of staff in navigating and embracing EBP. (Melnyk et al, 2011). 


It is important that one shares their findings from evidence based practice (EBP) research, with the rest of the scientific and medical community. Sharing and disseminating one’s research findings should go beyond just publishing in peer-reviewed journals (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). The practitioner should have a strategy to disseminate their research findings. One effective strategy may include conducting workshops and trainings to demonstrate this new research finding. These training workshops are most effective for research findings that can be contrasted with previous methodologies and can be proven to be more effective in clinical practice (Ross-Hellauer et al., 2020). In addition, leaders in the field specific to one’s research findings, should be invited to participate in these workshop training sessions. Another effective strategy is to present one’s research findings at a national conference, frequented by leaders in the field. Demonstrating one’s findings by presenting, as a speaker or in a poster presentation, at conferences can be very fruitful. Leaders in the field specific to one’s findings, may decide to adopt and utilize such EBP findings in their own organization and clinical practice. In addition, when other practitioners integrate the EBP findings in their respective organization and clinical practice, this will amplify the dissemination of EBP research findings, as the new findings are passed on to other colleagues.


Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is used in clinical settings and occurs when a solution needs to be found concerning a clinical based issue; EBP can also be used for educational research and teaching. EBP goal is to use scientific evidence along with hands on evidence to find the best solution (Newhouse et al., 2007, p. 556).

 

One of the many things I like to see when I’m working at a hospital and on a particular unit is what they’ve done to improve their patient care and the patients’ experience. One strategy that I like the most that I see throughout hospitals are posters displayed throughout the unit (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018) There’s usually a bulletin board with a specific evidence-based topic,  for example, foley care and preventing uti’s, Etc. Sometimes this is a unit-based activity or even done by a committee, to put these posters together; And sometimes these posters these bulletin boards are put together by new graduates joining the floor just so they can get an understanding on how to prevent certain things and how evidence-based practice is established, which I think is a great idea. I don’t really see any barriers to this strategy, although I do think this should be something that’s done for all staff not just new grads. I know different hospitals do things differently but my hospital in particular these bullets and boards and posters are mainly done by the new grads coming on to the floor.

 

Another strategy that I like is the use of committees, in my hospital we have a fall prevention committee and just different types of committees surrounding patient care and concerning staff/ workplace issues like diversity and bullying. Meetings are held on a weekly or biweekly basis to talk about issues that have happened that week or within that time frame, the issue is then investigated to see what we could have done better things that we need to work on how we can provide safety for patients and staff etc., and then kind of decisions are made based on the best suggestions that we’ve come up with. A barrier to this would be that this is more suggestive, and objective based on people within the committee, everyone’s input is it involved and it isn’t necessarily evidence based practice, it can be research based but sometimes it isn’t.

 

Lastly one of my favorite strategies to use to disseminate info quickly are the use of morning huddles (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Typically, at my main hospital huddles are only done during change of shift at 6:00 AM, that way night shift and day shift get the same information and it’s not done twice unless something critical pops up. The use of daily huddles allows staff to know and understand what’s happening throughout the unit on that particular day. Some of the things we usually review during daily huddle are number of falls if any,  how many days we’ve gone without falls, new policies and procedures that are effective,  mandatory education that needs to be competed, if JACHO is coming (lol), critical patients’, critical lab values on certain patients’,  what patients to look out for if they are a flight risk or combative,  number of staff that’s on the unit that day, who the resource is, and any other pertinent information that is needed. A barrier to this would be it’s only limited to the staff that joins the huddles unfortunately sometimes everyone isn’t able to make it to the huddle due to various reasons such as them being in their room with their patient etc.


EBP Dissemination Strategies 

 

     Evidence-based practice has proven to be the most effective way to provide quality care to patients and improve patient outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This is an essential factor in improving care. It has become how healthcare professionals worldwide practice medicine based on evidence-based research that supports how care is used. Research to find the most valid evidence to change how patients benefit. As medical professionals, it is up to us to keep this evidence up-to-date to provide and educate our patients about the best possible care.

  Most Likely to Use

       To provide the best care, we must continue to educate about what is proven. Teaching others is also helpful. Assuming people don’t know where the available resources are, they don’t know what to look for. We have to be there. We must teach evidence-based practices to others and help spread the knowledge gained after that. There are many strategies to disseminate EBP to others, but I am looking for ways to reach more people simultaneously. Nowadays, technology, especially social media, has become very pervasive. Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter have billions of users, making them popular research sites (Cooper, 2014). You can submit your EBP, videos, photos, and resource information to spread the word about evidence-based practice and how to find and apply best practices. Another EBP Dissemination Strategies is to create and use PowerPoint live. Presentations because I love PowerPoint. Presentations can be made at the organizational, regional, or national level. In PowerPoint presentations, you can find out how to get people’s attention through the content of the slides and group participation. Some people (myself included) have trouble learning by listening to someone talk, but seeing something and even how to join a group might help you figure it out.

Least Likely to Use 

             Different learning styles should be considered and explored when teaching others, as everyone learns in different ways. The best way to reach more people is to incorporate as many learning styles as possible into your teaching methods. One strategy I do not use is handouts or presentations that contain much material. Printed materials are the primary method of communicating important information about EBP (Williams, Casada-Castro, Dusablon, & Stipa, 2016). People lose focus when the speaker talks too much or the content is long. Studies show that most people can concentrate for 20 minutes when learning something new or difficult to remember. Another strategy I have been unable to use is to present on podiums at the regional and national levels. I do not mind speaking in front of a small group, but when it comes to a large group, I tend to get nervous and say “hmm” a lot or speak quickly and breathlessly. I’m nervous; many people will find it challenging to learn from me.  

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies

      Barriers that may be encountered when using PowerPoint presentations or social media are that technology is not perfect. Systems can crash, electronic devices fail, accounts get hacked, and presentations accidentally deleted. Social media use attracts younger age groups. They may not care or be ready to learn the evidence or what I have to say and teach. Prepare your presentations and information materials to engage all ages and learning styles, and have a backup plan in case the unexpected happens.


EBP Dissemination Strategies

Most Inclined and Least Likely to Use

Healthcare is constantly changing. With this change, nurses must be provided with the tools and environment to adapt to this change to continually provide safe and efficient patient care (Melnyk & Overholt, 2018). Healthcare leaders function each day with the ultimate goal of not causing harm to the sick, thus, ensuring that the care provided is supported by current and tested evidence (Caramanica & Gallagher-Ford, n.d.).  The evidence-based practice fosters better patient outcomes and nursing autonomy. Thus, this new information should be available to all clinicians (Newhouse et al., 2007). However, providing information alone will not ensure clinician’s to use EBP (Melnyk et al., 2011). In the dissemination strategy, I will most likely use evidence-based poster presentations. According to Melnyk & Overholt (2018), information about your work is prioritized in posters. Additionally, signs are displayed longer, which will give more time for interaction with colleagues and are less intimidating. Moreover, additional information may be provided through handouts.

Another strategy I prefer is media. Due to increased popularity, this may find funding for future research. Additionally, it is a means to attract the most qualified individuals to work for your institution. Most importantly, increased funding means increased student jobs and further change in public health (Melnyk & Overholt, 2018).

I will least likely use panel presentations and round table presentations. Although panel presentations are advantageous in that clinicians with different backgrounds can share knowledge, it takes a knowledgeable panelist and moderator to make them successful (Melnyk & Overholt, 2018). It needs more work organizing and briefing panelists. On the other hand, round table presentations allow a common topic for discussion and practical application. However, one must consider environment in which round table presentations will take place as too crowded space will cause delays(Melnyk & Overholt, 2018).

Potential Barriers to Inclined Dissemination Strategies/ Overcoming Identified Barriers

According to to Melnyk & Overholt (2018), poster needs to be built to catch the attention of the audience. If poorly designed, this will lead to poor format, information too much or not enough. To overcome this, one must learn how to present information that is concise making sure that the information stays relevant. In addition, presenters are expected to be beside the poster to answer questions from participants. However, scheduling the schedule for which the presenter is at the poster may help this issue so much so that interested participants will come together in a specific time. On the other hand, disadvantage of using media will be information overload for those who encounter it. To overcome this, one must make sure that information is clear and easy to understand. Melnyk & Overholt (2018) mentioned that one must use short sentences , and key messages should be summarized.

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.
  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
  • Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest | Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
  • Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
  • Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
  • Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
  • Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Post a brief description of your clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question.

Post a brief description of your clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question. Describe your search results in terms of the number of articles returned on original research and how this changed as you added search terms using your Boolean operators. Finally, explain strategies you might make to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search on your PICO(T) question. Be specific and provide examples.


The PICOT framework was designed to break down clinical questions into keywords that are searchable in databases, leading directly to related scholarly articles. The abbreviation of PICOT is Patient or Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Timeframe.  As an emergency room nurse dealing with patients going for elective procedures, such as orthopedic surgeries, or colonoscopies is quite stressful due to strict NPO after-midnight guidelines. As a nurse, I always wondered why a specific rule pertains to every patient expecting a procedure, regardless of what time the procedure is scheduled. I was wondering WHY DOES EVERYONE HAVE TO BE NPO AFTER MIDNIGHT? Using the PICOT framework, I developed a question asking whether it’s necessary to adhere to a standard NPO after midnight, or if there is another way to make patients more comfortable by decreasing hunger, thirst, dehydration, and risk for other health issues.

 

P – Patients needing procedures

I –   Intervention: Relaxing Strict NPO Guidelines

C – Comparison: Timeframe from NPO and procedure start

O – Outcome: Decrease Discomfort and other health issues

T- NPO time to Procedure time.

Using the PICOT framework, it was easier to find 1 more specific article in the Walden University databases, showing important evidence that lethal complications of aspiration pneumonia are rare when not adhering to NPO after midnight, making the whole strict guidelines need to be reconsidered (Sharma, et al. 2022). Before discovering the PICOT framework, I had issues connecting keywords and typing them into the search toolbar to find evidence-based related articles. From now on, I will now use the PICOT framework throughout my master’s degree career to find articles needed to find credible information and prove the research I’ve done.


My clinical issue of interest for this PICOT discussion is pressure ulcers in inpatient care facilities. My interest in pressure ulcers is driven by the high number of cases recorded annually in care facilities. The disease affects approximately 2.5 million people in hospitals annually (Borojeny et al., 2020).  A pressure ulcer is an injury on the skin and underlying tissues due to prolonged pressure on the skin. The condition affects patients who lie on their beds for a long without repositioning.

I used PICOT questions for easy searching of the relevant research resources. PICOT is a mnemonic made of initials for; patient, interventions, comparison, and objective/time (Duquesne University School of Nursing, 2020).  In my PICOT question, P is for the patients getting pressure ulcers in clinical settings, I represents repositioning, C is for comprehensive skin assessment, while O represents preventing pressure ulcers in hospitals.

I searched my question in the Walden University Library using the keywords ‘pressure ulcer prevention’ under the PubMed database, where 8,870 results appeared. After filtering sources within the last five years, I remained with 1,690 results. I further used the Boolean operator ‘and’ to search ‘pressure injury repositioning and comprehensive skin assessment,’ and received 6 results. Only one source was found to be published between 2017 and 2022 (Walden University Library, n.d.).

I also searched the question, ‘pressure ulcers prevention and management using the TRIP database, and received 1,768 results. After searching ‘Pressure ulcer repositioning and comprehensive skin assessment,’ I received 79 results. I filtered to get the sources within the last 5 years and received 28 results.

In the two databases, I used the filter option to increase the effectiveness and rigor of the database search on my PICO question. I chose the sources that have been authored from 2017 to 2022 to minimize the number of results from the database. I also used more specific keywords in searching (Walden University Library, n.d.).


Research Techniques

Clinical Issue

The clinical issue I chose was to evaluate the effects animal-assisted therapy (AAT) has on elderly dementia residents living in a nursing home setting. Of the four articles I found, they all indicated that allowing pet therapy with residents improved depressive symptoms, anxiety, feelings of isolation and behaviors associated with dementia in residents by promoting positive social interactions.

PICOT Question

Does animal-assisted therapy reduce behaviors associated with dementia in patients living in care facilities?

Research Method

My research method was through the nursing research page and the Boolean search bar. The first term I searched was ‘animal-assisted therapy’ which generated 3,215 results. I then added the word dementia and narrowed the publication dates from 2018-2022. I also limited the journals to peer-reviewed and full text which reduced the number to 152 results. One article that populated indicated that behaviors during the AAT study showed improved behaviors associated with aggression and irritability (Baek et al., 2020).

How to improve

To increase effectiveness and rigor in my searching strategies I plan to use key-word searching, subject heading searching, and title searching. Combining all three of these strategies will promote the best evidence available and increase results (Melnyk & Fineout-Overhold, 2018). Organizing and planning my strategy is another way I can improve research methods as I am, at times, quite disorganized. I can also utilize truncating, which is searching part of a word to identify similar words to increase results (Timmins & McCabe, 2005). Implementing these strategies will greatly improve my ability to identify appropriate articles in future researching.


Clinical Issue

My clinical issue in question is the presence of family members at the bedside in adult Intensive Care Units during cardiac arrest and resuscitation efforts. At my personal organization, it is not often considered or offered. I have been present during a handful of cardiac arrests in which family was offered the opportunity to be present. I felt that it was distressing for everyone involved, however it did offer families the chance to see the resuscitation efforts, know that the healthcare team did everything possible to save their loved one, and end resuscitation efforts in a timelier manner, reducing potential patient suffering and reduce use of unnecessary resources.

The most important part of a PICO(T) question is whether it is an answerable question (Davies, 2011). I feel that this question is complex, but indeed answerable. What may not be best for one family may be acceptable for another, but guidelines and best practices should be in place, even if the guidelines are simply to offer family presence during every cardiac arrest and resuscitation effort in Adult Intensive Care Units.

PICOT Question

Patient population/disease: Critically ill adults in Intensive Care Units suffering cardiac arrest and undergoing resuscitation efforts.

Intervention/issue of interest: Allowing family members to be present at the bedside during cardiac arrest and resuscitation efforts.

Comparison intervention or issue of interest: Not allowing family members to be present at the bedside during cardiac arrest and resuscitation efforts; asking family to leave the room if patient begins decompensating.

Outcome: Discover best practices and initiate standards of practice for allowing/not allowing family to be present during cardiac arrest and resuscitation efforts; surveying those present regarding their experience and perspectives.

Time: Survey families three, six and twelve months after cardiac arrest/resuscitation events to determine their perspectives and initiate standards of practice after at least one year for Intensive Care Units.

Database and Search Terms

I utilized CINAHL & MEDLINE Combined Search through the Walden Library. First, I searched “family presence during resuscitation” and that yielded 493 results. I narrowed my search years from 2018-2022, and this reduced results to 108. I added “intensive care unit” and this decreased results to only seven. It is clear from the number of results more research should be conducted on this topic to determine best practices. 

Database Strategies to Increase Rigor and Effectiveness

It is difficult to find resources if research is unavailable or has not been conducted, which seems to be the issue with the lack of resources for my specific clinical issue. Many articles are from studies conducted outside of the United States. I find this interesting as the priorities and practices in healthcare throughout the world differ than those in the United States. Many sources found are also literature review of older research, which falls outside of the date range of 2018-2022 that I utilized for my search to narrow relevant results. Testing out different search terms, adding, or removing certain words may help. 


Introduction

The PICOT framework was created so that complex clinical questions could be broken down into searchable terms that assisted researchers with the discovery of data (Davies, 2011). The framework is an acronym that is as follows, P is for patient/problem, I is for intervention, C is for comparison, O is for outcome, and T is for time (Davies, 2011). This framework guides researchers to format clinical questions into simple, searchable terms. The purpose of this discussion assignment is to describe the clinical issue that I have selected and how I searched for it, as well as how to effectively narrow down and choose relevant, factual articles to use for my research.

PICOT Question and Search

My PICOT question is as follows, do adult patients experience fewer medication errors when at a facility that uses a Barcode Medication Administration (BCMA) system compared to those who do not during their hospital stay? Medication errors most commonly occur during prescribing, distributing, and administering of medication (van der Veen et al., 2020). BCMA is a technology that is used to reduce medication errors by providing higher accuracy in identifying the correct patient, drug, and dose (Barakat & Franklin, 2020). I chose this clinical question because I worked as a medication nurse for a few years and experienced different facilities with different medication administration systems. I noticed that there was a lot more consistency when a barcode system was used as opposed to paper MARs. To search this topic I used the Walden Library and found numerous articles supporting my theory that BCMA systems improve effectiveness and patient safety. I found that the NIH National Library of Medicine has the most relevant and applicable research and data. To search for my topic, I started with the search for “barcode scanning medication administration”. This led me to find out that barcode medication administration is shortened to BCMA. This was helpful as it assisted me to use the correct term to search for more accurate and targeted articles. I used a few more techniques to be able to find exactly what I was looking for that I will discuss below.

Strategies for Effectiveness

An effective search is important when researching peer-reviewed articles, especially when we will be focusing on the same clinical issue that we chose for the entire semester. It is important that there is enough research and evidence that provides us with numerous studies to look at. After I discovered that BCMA was the correct term for my clinical issue, I refined my search. First, I changed the dates shown to only show me articles that were published within the last five years. This ensures that I am only looking at the most current research. I always do this first because I do not want to accidentally find a perfect article and then realize later on that it falls outside of this timeframe. I also make sure that I am only looking at peer-reviewed articles. The Walden Library makes this easy as we only have to check a box for this feature. Then, I utilize the “and” search box the most. I added “patient safety” and “medication errors” to my search and it made all the difference when narrowing down articles. After all of this, I was left with a decent amount of articles that were directly related to my clinical issue about BCMA systems and how they can reduce medication errors therefore also improving patient safety.

Conclusion

In conclusion, PICOT questions are an important aspect of research and it is vital that we know how to format them correctly. When this occurs, data gathering is made simple which saves time and energy that can be used elsewhere. I look forward to continuing to research my clinical question regarding BCMA systems and their effects on patient safety and medication errors. Overall, learning how to research clinical issues through the PICOT framework has improved my research abilities.


The process of making clinical inquiry entails the identification of the clinical practice problem followed by searching databases. It is essential to search databases to locate best practice evidence to address the clinical practice problem (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018; Stillwell et al., 2010). High rates of medication errors among hospitalized adults have become a concern in healthcare facilities. The hospital intends to implement a barcode medication administration (BCMA) system to reduce the rates of medication errors. It can only do so when there is evidence that supports the use of BCMA in medication error prevention (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). The population, intervention, comparison, and time period (PICOT) question related to this issue is that:

“In hospitalized adult patients (P), how does the implementation of a barcode medication administration (BCMA) technology (I) compared with the lack of the technology (C) affect rates of medication errors (O) within a period of six weeks (T)?”

The database search involved two major nursing databases from the Walden library: MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect. I selected the MEDLINE database from the Walden university library A-Z databases page and typed the keyword ‘barcode medication administration’ (Walden University Library, n.d.). The search initially yielded 58 results. I added the Boolean operators, limited my search to the peer-reviewed article, and within 5 years of publication. The search yielded 39 results. Two of the articles was about the impact of barcode medication administration on patient safety. Also, I selected the Science direct database and typed the key phrase ‘The effect of implementing bar-code medication administration’. It initially yielded 3,365 results. I limited my search again to the peer-reviewed and 5 years of publication. My result came down to 284 articles. Luckily, the first three articles aligned with my topic of interest.  Adding Boolean operators reduced the number of articles developed from the databases (Library of Congress, n.d.). The strategies the researcher can use to increase the effectiveness and rigor of database search include using the limiters, incorporating indexing terms, and using synonyms. Using abbreviations can help the researcher refine and locate suitable articles from a database.


Telehealth vs. Face-to-Face and Patient Outcomes

PICOT

            PICOT can be defined as P- What is the patient population? I- What is the interest or intervention? C- Comparing the intervention, O- What is the Outcome? T- What is the timespan for the outcome (MeInyk & Overholt, 2018)?  The PICOT for this assignment and our four-part assignment is P- Patients of all ages I- receiving telehealth services C- vs. in person/face to face O- affect patient outcomes (safety, costs, satisfaction, ER/re-hospitalization) T- over a year.

Description of Topic

The topic of choice for this discussion and our four-part assignment was telehealth vs. face-to-face and patient outcomes. We have all seen an increase in the use of telehealth services, especially since the pandemic went through the country. I know that in the clinic I work in, we have embraced this change and keep getting more and more providers and services done via telehealth. Since 2010, the use of telehealth in hospitals has grown from 35 to 76%. The use of telehealth has many positive aspects, such as being a time saver, reducing costs, reducing ER visits, and providing fewer costs for payers (American Hospital Association, 2022).

Search Results

            When beginning to research, I went to the Walden Library, typed in my PICOT question, and did not change any filters to the left, such as the year or peer-reviewed articles. From this, it took me to EBSCO and brought up 10,800,625, which I felt was interesting because when I was searching for part one of the assignment, I felt like I had somewhat of a difficult time. Some of the articles pulled from the search were about partial hospitalization treatment, physical therapy services, and telehealth vs. in-person (Walden University Library, 2022). Without clicking on them, they looked like ones that I may have dug deeper into researching. I then narrowed the search one step further to the time range of 2017-2022, and it decreased the number of articles to 3,707,814. I then narrowed it even more to peer-reviewed articles and decreased it to 3,304,643. The Walden Library has many databases and options and is a great resource, and in fact, most of my articles were found in this database and Google Scholar in part one of our assignment. Boolean operators are the words and, or, and not (University of Leads, 2022). If I wanted more specific information on each topic, such as safety, costs, and satisfaction, I changed my question to include just that topic, such as patient satisfaction and telehealth. This brought up a narrowed search regarding patient satisfaction levels with telehealth.

Database Strategies to Increase Rigor and Effectiveness

            I feel that when you are searching for information, you first must choose a topic that you know you can find enough information on. I knew that telehealth was a hot topic, especially since the pandemic. Second, I feel you must start off broad and work your way to a more specific topic when researching. For part one of the assignment, I found articles when I started off broad and then had to be more specific throughout. Third, we must narrow our searches by adding the year ranges and ensuring we can find current information. Full text and peer-reviewed articles are also needed to complete these assignments effectively. In the end, it was not that hard to find information, I just had to be patient and take the time to find what I needed.


There seems to be a lot of depression in our community lately. Here in Minnesota, it is cold. There are people who enjoy gardening, going for walks, sitting outside, and being a bit more active. In the winter months, people are not as active and find themselves sitting inside more. There are adults who do not want to go to the doctor due to the cost of the visits and the cost of medication. There are links between depression and exercise, with people feeling better after physical activity (Schuch et al., 2016). The question arises, what if you could educate on an intervention instead of prescribing medications that could save people money? What is the research on exercise and depression? The PICOT question is as follows:

In a population of adults, does physical activity compared to not exercising at all help to decrease symptoms of depression over a year time?

The databases that I searched for PICOT keywords were Ebsco, ProQuest, CINAHL, PubMed, and BMC psychiatry. To get the best evidence, the PICOT question must be well-built (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2009). During the search, Walden University Library was used to search for different research articles. I search the different databases and in the first search, the keywords used were exercise, depression, and geriatrics. I found 437 articles and after filtering to peer-reviewed and dated 2018 to the present, 87 articles were found. (Walden University Library, n.d.). I did change my question at this time and changed my population to adults, as I wanted to have a broader range. The other keyword that I used after needing more articles to review was “physical activity”. I reviewed so many articles and found that there are many trials going on. After accidentally reviewing and writing many trial articles that ended with no results, I learned to start checking on this prior to spending the time. Using adults and physical activity as keywords did give me some more research to focus on.


Clinical Issue of Interest

Miscommunications occur daily between the communicator and the recipient, especially among healthcare providers in acute care settings. An estimated 4,000 plus handoffs occur daily in hospitals (The Joint Commission, 2017). Literature determined that the transition of care is where most of these miscommunications occur. Whether it is between the off going or incoming nurse, patients, family members, or when transitioning care, this gap in communication affects the quality-of-care patients receive as it affects the nurses’ awareness of the situation and their decision-making, ultimately affecting patient safety. According to the Joint Commission (2017), inadequate handoffs are responsible for 30% of malpractice claims, almost two billion in malpractice costs, and 1744 lives coming to an end in a year. By examining stakeholders’ perspectives, I aim to answer this PICO question: In acute care settings, does bedside reporting improve communication between stakeholders and the quality of care of patients compared to nurse station reports?

Research Strategies and Results 

           Research began by utilizing a common and reliable database such as CINAHL, which I was comfortable using. In the initial search, keywords used included synonyms for shift reports such as handoff, change of shift, and bedside report while utilizing “OR,” one of the three Boolean terms (AND, OR, and NOT), which produced 1,984 options (Walden University, n.d.). Utilizing synonyms and Boolean terms such as OR helps produce a more flexible question that produces more results (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2022). Another tool used was truncation for the term report so that it can find this term with any ending that expands the search (Walden University, n.d.). To get more updated information, I narrowed the search by utilizing advanced search tools or filters to find literature between 2017 and 2022, decreasing the results to 615 articles. Filtering out non-peer-reviewed journals reduced results by 65. I added quality of care as it was my outcome in the PICO question, a measurement for care being rendered, reducing results further to 83 articles. A different strategy for finding other key terms and relevant articles was using cited referencing. The databases searched were PubMed, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health database, and MEDLINE.

Improving Rigor and Effectiveness

           To improve rigor, I will identify additional concepts related to my clinical issue PICO question to expand the results. Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2019) suggests using subject headings to help locate all materials on a topic regardless of terms used by the author to broaden the search. Another strategy I intend on using is the reference manager to help keep track of relevant information found if Walden offers it. 


My clinical issue of interest will be about hand hygiene compliance among health care workers. I have always enjoyed talking about this with my supervisors at work. I noticed often healthcare workers are too busy and sometimes don’t take handwashing seriously. Hand hygiene among professionals plays a crucial role in preventing healthcare-associated infections, yet poor compliance in hospital settings remains a lasting reason for concern. Nudge theory is an innovative approach to behavioral change first developed in economics and cognitive psychology, and recently spread and discussed in clinical medicine (Elia et al., 2022). 

My Picot question is among healthcare workers, how do hand hygiene compliance compared with noncompliance affect hospital infections. The purpose of a PICOT question is simple: It is the mechanism to identify the terms to be used to search for the best evidence to answer a burning clinical question. In other words, the PICOT question is the search strategy. The search strategy leads to an unbiased and effective search. The unbiased and effective search leads to the evidence (Gallagher & Melnyk, 2019) .

P(patient or population): Population is health care workers

I (Intervention): The use of hand hygiene

C (Comparison): The ability for health care workers to comply or not comply

O (Outcome):  From this Picot Question, we hope to see a reduction in hospital infections and see more compliance among health care workers.

In searching for my research articles, I focused on using the Walden Library website and the various resources provided by it. I used mainly CINAHL plus with full text. I enjoy their collection of journal articles and topics focused on nursing. I was able to get some informative articles on here.


My clinical issue of interest is researching how nursing burnout affects the quality of patient care. My interest in exploring nursing burnout started as a personal experience as an inpatient nurse. I have witnessed fellow nurses leaving their job firsthand, and the frustration and Burnout branch out to affect nurses and patient care. 

PICOT Question

Well-written PICOT question is fundamental to the evidence-based practice process. PICOT question has five components, and they are as follows: (Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). 

Patient population/disease- include age, gender, ethnicity, and specific disorder.

Intervention or Issue of interest- therapy, exposure to disease, prognostic factor A, risk behavior

Comparison intervention/issue of interest- alternative therapy, no disease, prognostic factor B, absence of risk factors

Outcome- outcome expected, risk of disease, the accuracy of diagnosis, rate of occurrence of adverse outcome

Time- the time involved in demonstrating an outcome

The clinical interest of choice for this research paper was How do inpatient nurses(P) with Burnout (I) impact patient outcome (O) during patients’ hospitalization(T)?

The PICOT question I have formulated doesn’t contain “C” as the question presented doesn’t require a comparison with nursing burnout and the impact of patient outcomes during patients’ stay at a hospital.

Method

As instructed, my research method was through the nursing research page provided by the Walden University library. The terms I’ve picked to start my research were “nursing” and “burnout.” I received numerous articles by simply putting in these two terms. I have selected four dated papers within the last five years to keep my research current. The four pieces chosen indicated that a better support system improved the nursing work environment and improved patient outcomes (Carthon., M., B., & Hatfield., L., & Brom., H., & Houston., M. & Kelly-Hellyer., E., & Schlak., A., & Aiken., L., H. (2021). However, most nurses either have Burnout or are at high risk of Burnout (Qedair, J., T., & Balubaid, R., & Almadani, R., & Ezzi, S., & Qumosani, T., & Zahid., R & Alfayea., T. (2022) the nursing workload, work-family conflict, job control, and social support didn’t seem to impact the quality of nursing service provided to patients. (Agustina & Tahlil, T., & Manina. (2022), yet, nursing burnout was positively associated with turnover rate. (Al Sabei., S., & Labrague., L., J., & Al-Rawajfah., O., & Abualrub., R., & Burney., I., A., & Jayapal., S., K. (2021).

Conclusion 

For a rigorous evidence-based practice research paper, the best levels of evidence are suggested for each type of clinical question. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, single RCTs, and well-controlled, nonrandomized experimental studies were presented for intervention questions. For prognosis questions, case-control or cohort studies were suggested as the best level of evidence. In future research, I plan to expose myself to as many articles as possible and look for the methodology section in each piece to search for different levels of evidence used for each article.


Clinical Issue 

The clinical issue I chose is the benefits of implementing bedside and what barriers exist to proper implementation of this process. Recently, the organization I work for had a big push to implement bedside shift report and audit the compliance from nursing. After implementing bedside shift report, we have seen slight improvement with patient satisfaction and patient safety. Although bedside shift report is beneficial, if not done correctly, patient safety measures are missed. The goal is to see what barriers are faced with implementing bedside shift report and if patient satisfaction and safety are improved with implementation of bedside shift report. 

Searching for evidence is easier by utilizing the PICOT process because it helps develop a careful and thoughtful question (Duquesne University, 2020). The question I chose has multiple components, but the research goes hand in hand with the topic selected. There are positive benefits to patient satisfaction and patient safety if bedside shift report is implemented correctly, however, barriers are faced while attempting to implement this process.  

PICOT Question 

Patient Population: Inpatients in acute care settings. 

Interventions/Issues of interest: Implementation of bedside shift report while nurses communicate hand-off report to one another.  

Comparison issue of interest: The positive impact on patient satisfaction and patient safety when proper implementation of bedside shift report occurs. 

Outcome: Discover barriers that exist to inpatients units implementing bedside shift report.  

Time: Survey nurses and supervisors in inpatient units and discover barriers that exist to bedside shift report. Reevaluate the same nurses 3-6 months post bedside shift report implementation.  

Database and Search Terms 

I utilized the Walden Library and used CINAHL & Pubmed as my database. I searched “bedside shift report” on CINAHL with advanced search criteria of “peer reviewed” and within years 2008 to current, which yielded twenty results. Unfortunately, not much research has been done regarding barriers to bedside shift report and further data needs to be collected. Due to the lack of studies performed on this topic, research articles were limited and made finding specific data difficult. Some articles were not relatable because they were performed outside of the United States or did not pertain to barriers faced by nurses. Hopefully in the future, with increased drive to implement bedside shift report within organizations, more research will be performed. 


PICOT Question

The United States has millions of adults living with diabetes, a chronic disease that has an adverse impact on the body’s ability to control blood sugar levels. Studies have shown that there is a genetic component associated with type 2 diabetes that leads to a decline in the ability of the pancreatic beta-cells to function, resulting in insulin resistance and hyperglycemia (Zappas & Granger, 2017). Further, Young et al., 2016 have described diabetes as a complex disease that is largely self-managed and requires the patient to monitor his blood glucose levels, take medication, eat a healthy diet, and engage in physical activity to keep well. Diabetic patients must take medication, modify their diet, and modify their lifestyles to manage diabetes, which can be a challenging task. PICOT question: In people with type 2 diabetes (P), how does lifestyle modification and diet (I) compare to medication use (C) in terms of reducing diabetes complications (T) during the first year after diagnosis (P)?

Database Search

Following the formulation of my PICOT clinical question, I refined my search by using Boolean operators and combining keywords such as diabetes, lifestyle changes, diet, and medications into a single search query. I used a variety of databases, including ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source, PubMed, CINAHL Plus with full text, and MEDLINE with full text. To ensure that I received the most recent, evidence-based literature, I limited my search to peer-reviewed articles published within the last six years. According to studies, recent research articles are preferred since they contain the most recent evidence-based practices and are more current (Wolf, 2019). A number of peer-reviewed articles were found to be relevant to my clinical question during the search.

One method I find extremely useful when searching databases during clinical research is combining keywords or concepts with Boolean operators. With this method, one is able to successfully combine relevant research keywords so that only articles that pertain to the keywords appear in the search results.


PICOT question 

The key to rigorous, evidence-based research lies in the development of a well-defined PICOT question. A PICOT question is formed as follows: P = patient population; I = intervention; = comparison intervention or group; O = outcome; and = time frame. Using the PICOT method has proven to be effective in providing relevant information as well as saving time (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). My clinical area of interest is treatment interventions for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). My PICOT question is, “In diabetic foot ulcers, how does debridement therapy compared to hyperbaric oxygen therapy affect healing within six months?”  

Search terms 

The keywords/phrases that I used for my searches were “diabetic foot ulcer”, “debridement”, and “hyperbaric oxygen therapy”.  

Databases Utilized for search 

I used three databases from the Walden library in my search – CINAHL Plus with full text, Medline with full text, and TRIP.  

Search results, articles returned, and changes from the boolean operators 

CINAHL: diabetic foot ulcers = 1,413 results. Diabetic foot ulcers AND debridement = 123 results. Diabetic foot ulcers AND debridement AND hyperbaric oxygen therapy = 5 results. 

Medline: diabetic foot ulcers = 3,126 results. Diabetic foot ulcers AND debridement = 263 results. Diabetic foot ulcers AND debridement AND hyperbaric oxygen therapy = 10 results.

I also used the TRIP database PICO format with the keywords “diabetic foot ulcer”, “debridement”, hyperbaric oxygen therapy”, and “healing”. This search yielded 8 results. 

Database strategies to increase rigor and effectiveness 

I always use the nursing category, boolean phrases, select peer-reviewed, and set the time frame published between 2017 and 2022. PubMed has a PICO tool and is a comprehensive database that can be used when conducting an exhaustive literature review (Brown, 2019). I have used PubMed many times and always find quality, peer-reviewed articles that support the research I am conducting. I found a great article about the importance of evidence-based practice (EBP) and clinical inquiry. This article by JoAnn Mick summarizes and simplifies the EBP process: Step 1: Ask (the PICOT question). Step 2: Gather (information). Step 3: Appraise (the evidence). Step 4: Act (propose changes). Step 5: Evaluate (the effect of the changes). Step 6: Disseminate (share results) (Mick, 2017).  


Working in cardiology, we have a lot of “repeat offenders,” patients that are frequently readmitted to the hospital. Specifically, we see patients with heart failure frequently. One study showed a 18.2 % 30-day readmission rate and a 31.2% 90-day readmission rate (Khan, et. al, 2021). As a new nurse, this always intrigued me. I would wonder, “Why does this specific patient population have high readmission rates?” Now, as a more experienced nurse, I have realized some of the pitfalls within our system that make it harder for cardiology patients to adhere to post-admission care and instructions. Being said, it is incredibly important for these patients to get adequate follow up care to ensure the best patient outcomes. We can try to identify ways to help these patients through research and using clinically applicable questioning. For me this question is, “For heart failure patients (P), does early post hospital admission follow up (I), when compared to no hospital follow up (C), make a significant difference in readmission rates (O)?”

The use of PICO(T) format is imperative when performing research. It allows us to “find the needle in the haystack” by identifying the clinical issue at hand (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). The use of PICOT leads to a more effective search, thus leading to more appropriate search results. using key works from my PICO question resulted in 6 relevant articles on pubmed. I could use the advanced search tool to specify what years I wanted the results to be from and I will, of course, consult other databases in my continuing effort to answer this question. These will increase the rigor and effectiveness of my database searches.


Questions are the chief reasoning behind evidence-based practice (EBP). EBP helps to answer clinical questions and inquiries which focus on real-world, practical problems and issues (Davies, 2021). Articulating clinical inquiries and questions is an essential and beneficial skill. Every clinician must be able to formulate a clinical question to maximize the amount of pertinent information retrieved with the least amount of time invested. To develop a research question, the PICOT format is known to be the best approach. The PICOT format stands for P: population of interest; I: intervention or issue of interest; C: comparison of interest; O: outcome expected; and T: time for the intervention to achieve the outcome (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This discussion will address the clinical issue of nursing bedside shift report and assess barriers to its successful implementation. 

Clinical Issue

Nursing shift report, is the process in which vital patient information, responsibility, and accountability are exchanged between off going and oncoming nurses. This has typically been done at various places in the unit. However, recent literature shows the importance of bringing this key handoff to the bedside and involving the patient and/or family in this process. In addition to patient satisfaction, nursing bedside shift report is known to minimize errors and improve nursing quality of care and patient safety. There has, however, been reluctance and obstacles to its successful implementation (Dorvil, 2018). 

PICOT Question

In the initiation phase of implementing a nursing bedside shift report initiative, are there any barriers that nursing staff and nurse leaders face that prevent consistency of nursing bedside shift report within the first 12 weeks?

P- Population of Interest: Nursing staff involved in bedside shift report

I- Intervention of Interest: Consistent performance of nursing bedside shift report by nursing staff during handoff

C- Comparison of Interest: Inconsistent or limited nursing bedside shift report performed, shift report completed in places other than at the bedside.

O- Outcome Expected: Identifying barriers to successfully implementing nursing bedside shift report initiatives.

T- Time: 12 weeks

In answering this clinical question, this insight has the potential to minimize barriers and provide improvements to make implementing nursing bedside shift report in clinical areas successful.  

Search Results

I searched for information regarding this clinical question using CINAHL Plus with Full Text through the Walden University Library’s A-Z databases page. I limited the search to selecting only full-text and peer-reviewed scholarly journals. I typed in the words “nursing bedside shift report” in the search bar to generate results. In addition, I made sure the publication date only ranged within five years. This yielded 13 articles. To increase findings, I utilized the Boolean operator AND, searching bedside AND shift report, generating 45 results. Using the same filters, I also utilized ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database through the Walden University Library. This generated 15 articles. In utilizing the Boolean operator AND, and searching beside AND shift report, the results increased to 40. 

Strategies to Increase Rigor and Effectiveness

           A strategy to increase the rigor of the database search toward the clinical question would be utilizing Boolean operators. In my experience, using Boolean operators increased the number of results yielded from the databases. According to Walden University (n.d.), Boolean operators help to create more exact and powerful searches, yielding a higher percentage of relevant results. Additionally, using filters to limit results can help the user tailor the results to their specifications which can be a strategy to increase the effectiveness of the database search. In using filters, the user can limit the search to only full-text articles, peer-reviewed articles, and publication dates within a specified time frame. 


My clinical interest is an evaluation of face-to-face visits compared to telehealth visits in managing chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Investigating how telehealth can best be utilized in primary care and rural health.
My health center steers away from telehealth visits in acute care situations. Acute care is unpredictable and often requires an in-depth physical exam and evaluation to develop a diagnosis and differential diagnosis. There is a greater risk in using telehealth with acute care. For example, a patient presents via telehealth visit with abdominal pain and vomiting. A telehealth consultation with this patient may lead a clinician to treat it as a viral illness; however, if the same patient presents in a face-to-face encounter and a full physical exam is completed with findings such as rebound tenderness and guarding, it will lead to a differential diagnosis of appendicitis which may need emergent intervention.
My health center is still trying to define the best use of telehealth in chronic care associated with conditions such as diabetes, dementia, hypertension, etc. Can we effectively or better manage chronic health conditions with telehealth or remote patient monitoring in rural areas?  When barriers such as transportation and limited mobility due to age, loss of vision from diabetes, total care due to dementia, oxygen therapy due to lung disease, etc., decrease compliance to follow-up visits due to the many challenges of just accessing care.
The PICOT format is a systematic approach to developing a clinical question. (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019) Using this format based on my area of interest, the patient population (P)= patients with chronic conditions; the intervention (I) = telehealth or telemedicine in addition to face-to-face encounters, the comparison (C)= face-to-face encounters only; the outcome (O) = improved outcomes in chronic conditions, and the time (T)=over one year. My formulated PICOT question: Do patients with chronic care conditions such as diabetes and hypertension have better outcomes over a year if telehealth is used in conjunction with face-to-face encounters versus only face-to-face encounters?
I utilized databases CINAHL Plus, Cochrane, and Medline. I applied a Boolean phrase that utilizes connecting words such as and, or, and not to produce a more specific search phrase. (Walden University Library, n.d.) Telehealth, telemedicine, or remote patient monitoring in the phase yielded 58,617 results. I applied additional limitations using filters such as peer-reviewed, full text, publication dates 2018-2023, and journal articles; this narrowed search down to 123. I then added specific topics such as hypertension, diabetes, and chronic health and narrowed it to 47 articles.


My PICOT research question:

In hospitalized patients, how do healthcare workers and patients washing their hands with soap and water compare with not washing or using hand sanitizer affect infection transmission during hospital stay?

To find a suitable clinical problem for research, one must determine the goal one has in mind first. We are taught in school that patient safety always comes first. This could mean preventing harm, reducing medication errors during patient care, or keeping patients safe from infectious diseases through policies and protocols. I chose this question because hand hygiene is necessary to protect ourselves and others from dangerous situations that could have been avoided. Hand hygiene is one of the essential measures to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2, which causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19) (Haston et al., 2020). The PICOT is used to form a clinical research question and covers all areas for an efficient search with accurate information (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This type of question format falls under the foreground question because it is a specific question (Stillwell, Fineout-Overholt, Melnyk & Williamson, 2010) and helps narrow down what you need to focus on and saves valuable research time.

I began my search using the keywords “Hand Hygiene” and “Hand Hygiene Compliance” in the Walden Library’s default Thoreau database. Using them is the first step because the main key points of the question should be searched separately (Stillwell et al., 2010). There were 37,039 results on hand hygiene, which was a broad number and was different from what I needed. On the other hand, there were 6,426 results on hand hygiene compliance, most of which I saw were related to healthcare workers. Playing around with wordings in this database while using the keyword in my question helps to refine it even more. I added “Patient” and “Healthcare Professional,” adjusted the filter settings to change the date to the last five years and checked the peer-reviewed box. It produced 87 articles about healthcare workers, patients, and hand hygiene. Another database I decided to search was CINAHL, and when I started using the exact keywords and filters, the search went from 1,963 to 23 results. All focused on just healthcare and hand hygiene compliance. This second database has narrowed the search significantly. The last database I checked was the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and I used the exact keywords and filters as the other two. There were only 22 articles in the database this time, but when I tried to use more words, I eventually had none. I did not find this helpful for my question. The only Boolean operator I used was “AND.” This is because many helpful journal articles are displayed in this way. One strategy to expand my research is to try more keywords from my PICOT question and play with more Boolean operators to try different combinations of them. There are also many database options for searching articles. You must look for something that fits your theme.


The clinical topic I have chosen for this week’s discussion is “Is the combination of two or more antipsychotics more effective and safer than the use of one antipsychotic in individuals with psychotic disorders?” I decided to search for “mental disorders” and selected databases recognized by the Walden University Libraries.

I started my search from the Cochrane database of systemic reviews. This is considered “the strongest evidence for the intervention question because it has the best study design and is generally the most rigorous” (Stillwell, S.B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B.M. & Williamson, KM, 2014). An unfiltered search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews yielded 9 results. Most of them were related to drugs and their effects. Then I added two more databases: CINAHL and full-text and psych information. Just adding those two gave us 31,509 unfiltered results. From here, I’ve added additional search terms and identifiers to narrow my search. I selected psychotic disorders and single antipsychotics and combination therapy as search terms. In my search expander, I selected a boolean expression containing full-text, peer-reviewed scientific papers from 2014 to 2022. For the Cochrane database, we selected Cochrane reviews from 2015 to 2022. The specific limiters used for psych information were peer-reviewed journals from 2015 to 2022, and in CINAHL plus I used evidence-based practices in psychiatry/psychology. This search yielded 7,259 results, which is a lot. From there, adding the Boolean search term “medicine” yielded 783 results. Then, adding the Boolean search term “safe” yielded 35 results from the main article discussing specific medications for psychotic disorders. Removing the two Boolean search terms and adding combination therapy to the search returned 36 articles.

I selected specific keywords from PICOT questions and used database-driven vocabulary to further narrow the results. Something specific that might help is to select “Nursing” from the Topic Resource drop-down box on the Walden University Library home page. On this page, you can choose from various databases where research material is available (Walden University, n.d. a).


PICOT Question

In evidence-based practice (EBP), the PICOT format is used to formulate a clinical question (Mazurek Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). PICOT is an acronym that stands for P is for population, I is for intervention, C is for comparison, O is for the outcome, and T stands for the timeframe (Mazurek Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).  My PICOT question is in regard to an intervention, and is as follows:

In patients who have undergone coronary artery stenting, what is the optimal length of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) before transitioning to monotherapy to decrease the incidence of in-stent restenosis and other related events in the one-to-two-year period after coronary artery stenting?

In regard to the clinical question, Davies (2011) says, “One of the most challenging aspects of EBP is to actually identify the answerable question.” (p. 75). PICO is first mentioned in the text in 1995 by Richardson, Wilson, Nishikawa and Hayward, and in 2005, Fineout-Overholt & Johnson suggested adding the “T” for the timeframe (Davies, 2011).

Search Terms

I utilized the search terms “dual antiplatelet therapy”, “monotherapy” and “coronary intervention”. I also set the date range from 2016 to 2023, and in the CINAHL and Medline combined database, I was able to select a search option that returned randomized control trials (RCT’s) only.

Databases Utilized for Search

  For my search, I used the CINAHL and Medline Combined, the ProQuest Health and Medical, and the Google Scholar databases to find the articles for my research. I accessed these databases through the Walden University Library.

Search Results, Articles Returned, and Changes from use of Boolean Operators 

  I received a lot more results than I expected, even with the date range being relatively small. I had to make several changes to the search terms to find the best articles. I kept the Boolean Operator to “AND” to get results that included my search terms. Boolean Operator can also be referred to as a Boolean Connector, and are the words “AND” and “OR” (Hartzell & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). I also had to sift through them to find primary research. I eventually settled on these articles related to recent primary research:

Chichareon, P., Modolo, R., Kawashima, H., Takahashi, K., Kogame, N., Chang, C.-C., . . . Serruys, P. W. (2020, March). DAPT Score and the Impact of Ticagrelor Monotherapy During the Second Year After PCI. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 13(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.018

Hahn, J.-Y., Song, Y., Oh, J.-H., Chun, W., Park, Y., Jang, W., . . . Gwon, H.-C. (2019, June 25). Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 321(24), 2428-2437. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.8146

Hong, S.-J., Kim, J.-S., Hong, S., Lim, D.-S., Lee, S.-Y., Yun, K., . . . Hong, M.-K. (2021, August). 1-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Aspirin Monotherapy After Polymer-Free Drug-Coated Stent Implantation: One-Month DAPT Trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 14(16), 1801-1811. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.003

Koo, B.-K., Kang, J., Rhee, T.-M., Yang, H.-M., Won, K.-B., Rha, S.-W., . . . Kim, Y. (2021). Aspirin versus clopidogrel for chronic maintenance monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (HOST-EXAM): an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. The Lancet, 397(10293), 2487-2496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01063-1


I chose the clinical issue of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). In my facility, we have a new urologist working in surgery. She would like catheters placed prior to some of her surgeries. It has been pounded into nurses’ brains for the past few years that catheters should be a last resort. When I was tasked with picking a topic, I chose CAUTI. In hopes of finding out the ins and outs protecting patients from getting an infection as we are increasing our catheter usage. PICO is a model used to assist in starting with the right questions when starting research (Davies, 2011).  The acronym PICO stands for patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome (Davies, 2011). I found a template on-line that lays out PICO nicely and thought I would share (Claude Moore Health Sciences Library, n.d.) the link is below in my references. My initial search using the acronym CAUTI and search returned three thousand nine hundred and seventy-one results, returned seven thousand one hundred and twenty-six results. That decreased by about six hundred when I searched only peer reviewed articles. I used a Boolean operator by using the full term, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and it returned seven thousand one hundred and twenty-six results. I plan to dig deeper into CAUTI’s and find best practices. I will work with my educator to make sure we are utilizing best-practice to assure patient safety.


As an inpatient dialysis nurse working with different institutions, it has been brought to my attention that one facility has had skyrocketing CLABSI rates while the others have not. Both facilities enforce different CVC dressing policies, which raises my curiosity as to whether these practices are more beneficial—maintaining current trends and best practices vital for providing optimal patient care (Melnyk & Overholt, 2018).

For this discussion, my area of interest focuses on adult patients with CVC and how their engagement and nurse compliance in CLABSI prevention guidelines affect this highly preventable healthcare-associated infection. To help improve processes and patient outcomes, clinical questions must be made in a way that searches for solutions that are as efficient as possible (Stillwell et al., 2010). To make this possible with my inquiry, I utilized the PICOT format, which stands for Population of interest, Intervention or issue of interest, comparison of interest, the outcome expected, and time for the intervention to achieve the result (Melnyk & Overholt, 2018).

PICOT QUESTION

P – Adult patients with CVC

I – patient engagement and nurse compliance

C- no or low patient engagement and nurse compliance

O – affect CLABSI rates

T – within 12 months

In searching for articles related to my PICOT question, I learned I could use Boolean terms. Using Boolean terms, I used similar terms in another terminology to increase yield results (Walden University Library, n.d.). I searched for CLABSI, or Central Line-Associated Infection while adding patient engagement and nurse compliance. I also searched for CLABSI or Central Line-Associated Infection and hemodialysis or haemodialysis patients. All said terminologies yielded high volumes of recent articles as CLABSI has been an ongoing problem in hospitals globally. I then select articles that I found to relate to my topic.


PICOT

P- What type of patients are in this population? I – What is the intervention or the interest? C – Contrasting the intervention, and O – determining the outcome. T – How long will it take for the result to become apparent? (MeInyk & Overholt, 2018)?  The PICOT for this assignment and our four-part assignment is P– People of every age I – getting services through telehealth C– vs. face to face/in person O– affect patient outcomes (safety, costs, satisfaction, ER/re-hospitalization, etc.) T– more than a year.

Topic Description

Our four-part assignment’s chosen subject was telemedicine vs face-to-face care and patient outcomes. Since the nation was hit by the epidemic, we have all seen a rise in the usage of telehealth services. I am aware that at the clinic where I work, we have welcomed this transition and continue to use telehealth to access an increasing number of doctors and services. Hospital telehealth use increased from 35% to 76% since 2010 (Hoare et al., 2013). The use of telehealth has various benefits, including time savings, cost savings, a decrease in emergency room visits, and lower expenses for payers.

Search Results

I went to the Walden Library to start my research and put in my PICOT query without changing any of the criteria on the left, like the year or peer-reviewed papers. This led me to EBSCO and produced the result 10,800,625, which I found intriguing since I felt like I struggled a little bit while looking for part one of the homework. Physical therapy services, telemedicine vs. in-person health care, and partial hospitalization treatment were some of the topics covered in the search results articles (Hoare & Hoe, 2013). They seemed to be ones that I may have looked into more thoroughly had I not clicked on them. When I further restricted the search to the years 2017–2022, there were 3,707, 814 less articles to choose from. I then reduced it to 3,304,643 by further limiting it to peer-reviewed literature. In reality, the majority of my papers for the first portion of our project were discovered in this database and Google Scholar, which is a terrific resource that the Walden Library offers. The terms and, or, and not are known as Boolean operators. I updated my inquiry to include just that issue, such as patient satisfaction and telehealth, if I needed more detailed information on each subject, such as safety, costs, and satisfaction. This led to a more focused inquiry on telehealth patient satisfaction rates.

Database Strategies

When looking for information, I believe that the first step should be to decide on a subject about which you are certain that you can obtain a sufficient amount of data. I was aware that telehealth was becoming an increasingly popular issue, particularly after the epidemic. When doing research, I believe it is important to begin with a wide subject and then narrow down to one that is more focused as you go. The first section of the project required me to find articles by beginning with a wide focus and then narrowing it down as I progressed through the task. Third, we need to refine our searches by include year ranges and checking to see if we can locate material that is up to date. In order to successfully complete these projects, you will also need to consult publications with both full texts and peer reviews. In the end, locating the information I need was not nearly as difficult as I had anticipated; nonetheless, I did need to exercise patience and put in some effort before I was successful (Walden University Library, n.d.-a).


PICOT

PICOT is used to help condense research questions and examine interventions. The (P, population) represents your sample size. The (I, intervention) references the treatment options  that may be provided to the sample size. The ( C, comparison) is used for comparing the interventions. (O, outcome) refers to the results you measure to examine the effectiveness of your intervention, and the (T, time) is based on the duration of your data collection (Stillwell, 2010) .

Clinical Issue

The clinical issue I chose to research for this PICOT discussion is: How does hourly rounding decrease falls in hospitals (all ages)? I chose this topic because prevention is key in healthcare, if patients fall during their hospital stay it greatly impacts their overall health. Depending on the age and condition of the patient sometimes things such as falls can lead to longer hospital stays, other serious issues and may even be fatal (Spano, 2019).

Database and Search Terms

The search terms I used we’re: “Benefits to hourly rounding”. The database I utilized was Medline in Full Text. The search results came back with only one article from 2022 titled: Nurses’ perceptions of hourly rounding in Jordanian hospitals: A national survey. I used the Boolean (and) search option “hourly rounding AND fall prevention” and received 10 results back. The results had publishing dates from 2013-2021  (Walden University Library, n.d.).

I also used CINAHL Plus with Full Text and searched “fall prevention interventions”. It came back with 1,275 articles, I further searched limiting the texts to “scholarly (peer reviewed)” and the results and back with 571 articles from 2018 to 2022. Using the Boolean option, I searched “fall prevention AND interventions or strategies or best practices”, peer reviewed. The results came back with 2095 articles also ranging from 2018 to 2022 (Walden University Library, n.d.).

Strategies for Effectiveness

I found that filtering my search options was the most effective strategy I could implement when researching this topic. Making sure I checked off the box for peer reviewed articles, only searching specific dates was helpful, and using the Boolean search option and, and or. When I’m really trying to filter out my search options, sometimes I also use location as far as US or out of country  and particular state etc; Especially when it comes to laws and regulations.


Nosocomial infections or hospital acquired infections (HAI) continue to be a major problem in many hospitals. Combatting nosocomial infections require implementing stringent and routines strategies. Nosocomial infections affect approximately 3.2% of all hospitalized patients in the United States and approximately 6.5% of all hospitalized patients in Europe. Nosocomial infection is the most common adverse event that affects patients (Dasgupta et al., 2015). This is a clinical issue of interest to my practice, as we occasionally battle this issue. I completed a comprehensive search using the Boolean operator “or” to search for “nosocomial infections” and “hospital acquired infections” search parameters. I decided to search the ebscohost database, as this is one of the most comprehensive and complete databases for scientific and clinical research articles (Bramer et al., 2017). My initial general search yielded over 20K returned articles. I then did a more refined search by using the above criteria with the Bolean operator “and” along with the search term “prevention strategies”. This more refined search yielded approximately 8900 returned articles (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2020). I then used a more stringent means to obtain more specific articles. I requested only articles that were published in the last five years. I also requested only peer-reviewed articles. Finally I requested articles that we full text articles that contain a link to the entire article. The final search yielded approximately 1600 articles. I will choose from this final set of articles for subsequent PICOT report. The most appropriate stringencies to promote the rigors of article searches involve selecting peer-reviewed articles. Selecting peer–reviewed article is one of the most basic stringencies in conducting a database search. In addition, selecting articles that were published in the last five years, is another stringency. Articles that were published in the last five years more than likely will contain a cumulative understanding of the subject matter from prior research studies. In addition, one nay desire to select articles that contain the full text, as it may be important to peruse areas of the article, such as methods and materials, to get a firm understanding of the research study. References Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 6;6(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. Dasgupta S, Das S, Chawan NS, Hazra A. Nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit: Incidence, risk factors, outcome and associated pathogens in a public tertiary teaching hospital of Eastern India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;19(1):14-20. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.148633. Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

Homelessness or people experiencing homelessness (PEH) while also having mental health illness and or substance use disorder continues to be a recurring problem in adult inpatient psychiatry unit frequent readmissions. According to Tsai et al 2017, “People with severe mental illness who experience homelessness are an especially vulnerable group worldwide.” In recent global studies, there is a significantly higher rate of psychotic disorders among people experiencing homelessness with elevated levels of suicidality and a heavy burden of some comorbid physical health and substance use disorders. (Tsai et al 2017). 

To better search for the best available evidence-based practice, I will develop a PICOT question that will among other things guide me in conducting a systematic search of healthcare databases to be able to find the best available evidence. (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt 2018) 

The components of a PICOT question, which is a mnemonic with each letter making part of the question according to Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2018), is as follows: 

  • P –Patient population/disease 
  • I -intervention or issue of interest. 
  • C –Comparison intervention or issue of interest 
  • O -Outcome 
  • T -Time  

Based on the above information my PICOT question will be, in patients with mental health illness and or substance use disorder, how does being homeless compared to having stable housing affects readmission rates in an adult inpatient psychiatric unit within 30 days of discharge. 

My search was done using Walden university library resources, I used the EBSCO advanced search engine, my key word was homelessness then my additional words were, AND mental illness AND substance use. The search yielded 1044 results. To improve the rigor of the search, I limited the research to full text, peer reviewed scholarly journals only and publications between 2017 to 2022. Walden university (n.d.). 


 

Identifying Research Methodologies – The Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.