D022 TASK 3

COMPETENCIES

2045.5.3 : Evaluation of People and Talent

The graduate evaluates faculty and staff performance to create a productive work environment that supports a school’s mission, vision, and values, and adheres to human resource law, policy, and ethical practice.

INTRODUCTION

School principals are responsible for evaluating and supporting faculty and staff performance to create a productive work environment. This work environment should support the school or district’s mission, vision, and beliefs (or values) while also adhering to human resource law, policy, and ethical practice. This task will give you the opportunity to demonstrate competency in performing a classroom observation and using your observations to create a professional growth plan (PGP).

SCENARIO

In this task, you will act as West Oak Cove’s principal to conduct a classroom observation using the attached “Classroom Observation Form” and one of the videos from the “List of Classroom Observations” attachment. Then you will use the results from the classroom observation to draft a professional growth plan. This plan is designed to help the teacher improve instructional practice and better align to the mission, vision, and beliefs, which are as follows:

Mission

At West Oak Cove, we prepare all students to prosper in a rapidly changing and diverse world. In addition to rigorous academics, our students are taught to value diversity, use critical thinking for solving real-world problems, and develop a growth mindset.

Vision

Our vision is to be a model of progressive education by incorporating new and evolving evidence-based pedagogical practices that support our students’ innate curiosity, compassion, and courage.

Beliefs

•  Education is learning how to learn.

•  All students are capable of learning when a growth mindset is reinforced.

•  Diversity makes a community strong.

•  Everyone is deserving of kindness.

•  Integrity is the foundation of academic excellence.

REQUIREMENTS

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A.  Using the attached “Classroom Observation Form,” conduct a classroom observation of a recorded lesson in the “List of Classroom Observations” attachment.
B.  Using the attached “Teacher Professional Growth Plan,” create a professional growth plan with two areas for professional growth that aligns to the mission, vision, and beliefs. The professional growth plan must be designed to help the teacher improve an aspect noted from the classroom observation.
C.  Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
D.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

RUBRIC

GENERAL TEACHING DISPOSITIONS AS INDICATED IN THE WGU TEACHERS COLLEGE CODE OF ETHICS:

NOT EVIDENT

The submission demonstrates consistently unprofessional or unethical behavior or disposition as outlined in the WGU Teachers College Code of Ethics.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission demonstrates behavior or disposition that conflicts with the professional and ethical standards outlined in the WGU Teachers College Code of Ethics.

COMPETENT

The submission demonstrates behavior and disposition that align with the professional and ethical standards outlined in the WGU Teachers College Code of Ethics.

A. CLASSROOM OBSERVATION:NELP 7, PSEL 6

NOT EVIDENT

An observation form is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The observation form does not identify which video from the “List of Classroom Observations” attachment was used or does not indicate that a full instructional lesson was observed. Or the evidence for 1 or more rating categories is not based on an example from the video or corresponding commentary or instructional materials.

COMPETENT

The observation form identifies which video from the “List of Classroom Observations” attachment was used, indicates that a full instructional lesson was observed, and provides evidence for each rating category that is based on examples from the video or corresponding commentary or instructional materials.

B. PGP PART I: PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AREAS AND RATIONALE:NELP 7, PSEL 6

NOT EVIDENT

2 target areas for professional growth and a rationale for each area are not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

1 or more target areas or rationales do not align with the scenario. Or 1 or more rationales do not align with their corresponding target area or do not provide a logical basis for selection.

COMPETENT

Each target area and rationale aligns with the scenario. Each rationale aligns with its corresponding target area and provides a logical basis for selection.

B. PGP PART II: PROFESSIONAL GROWTH GOALS AND ACTIVITIES:NELP 7, PSEL 6

NOT EVIDENT

2 professional growth goals and a growth activity for each goal are not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

1 or more professional growth goals do not align with their corresponding target area or rationale or do not adhere to SMART criteria. Or 1 or more professional learning activities do not align with their corresponding goal.

COMPETENT

Each professional growth goal aligns with its corresponding target area and rationale and adheres to SMART criteria. Each professional learning activity aligns with its corresponding goal.

B. PGP PART III: DOCUMENTING GOAL PROGRESS AND ATTAINMENT:NELP 7, PSEL 6

NOT EVIDENT

2 methods for documenting goal progress and 2 methods for goal attainment are not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

1 or more methods for documenting goal progress or goal attainment do not align with their corresponding goal or activity or would not provide evidence of progress or attainment.

COMPETENT

Each method for documenting goal progress and goal attainment aligns with its corresponding goal and activity and would provide evidence of progress and attainment.

B. PGP PART IV: PGP AND THE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION:NELP 7, PSEL 6

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how the professional growth plan addresses teacher improvement is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation does not identify an aspect noted from the classroom observation or does not make a logical argument for how the professional growth plan helps the teacher improve the aspect.

COMPETENT

The explanation identifies an aspect noted from the classroom observation and makes a logical argument for how the professional growth plan helps the teacher improve the aspect.

C. SOURCES:

NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.

COMPETENT

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.

D. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION:

NOT EVIDENT

Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.

COMPETENT

The candidate provides an adequate response.

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

Calculate the price of your order

Simple Order Process

Fill in the Order Form

Share all the assignment information. Including the instructions, provided reading materials, grading rubric, number of pages, the required formatting, deadline, and your academic level. Provide any information and announcements shared by the professor. Choose your preferred writer if you have one.

Get Your Order Assigned

Once we receive your order form, we will select the best writer from our pool of experts to fit your assignment.

Share More Data if Needed

You will receive a confirmation email when a writer has been assigned your task. The writer may contact you if they need any additional information or clarifications regarding your task

Let Our Essay Writer Do Their Job

Once you entrust us with your academic task, our skilled writers embark on creating your paper entirely from the ground up. Through rigorous research and unwavering commitment to your guidelines, our experts meticulously craft every aspect of your paper. Our process ensures that your essay is not only original but also aligned with your specific requirements, making certain that the final piece surpasses your expectations.

Quality Checks and Proofreading

Upon the completion of your paper, it undergoes a meticulous review by our dedicated Quality and Proofreading department. This crucial step ensures not only the originality of the content but also its alignment with the highest academic standards. Our seasoned experts conduct thorough checks, meticulously examining every facet of your paper, including grammar, structure, coherence, and proper citation. This comprehensive review process guarantees that the final product you receive not only meets our stringent quality benchmarks but also reflects your dedication to academic excellence.

Review and Download the Final Draft

If you find that any part of the paper does not meet the initial instructions, send it back to us with your feedback, and we will make the necessary adjustments.