Harris Interactive survey

Description

For multiple choice questions, circle only one answer, unless otherwise directed.  Show work for partial credit.  If R is required, insert the annotated code with the solution after the question for full credit. (Putting all R code at the end of the document will not get full credit)

Section 1:  R is not required for this section, but it may be used for calculations and to show work.

  1. A Harris Interactive survey of 502 senior human resource executives in the Mid-Atlantic Region asked for the best method of finding the best candidates from a list of methods (e.g. referrals, LinkedIn, etc.).  Fifty-eight percent responded that referrals were one of the methods for finding the best candidates.
    1. What is the population?
  1.             502 senior human resource executives in Mid-Atlantic Region
  2.             Senior human resources executives in the Mid-Atlantic Region

                                                    iii.            The methods for finding the best candidates

  1.             Fifty-eight percent responding that referrals were one of the methods used
    1. What is the sample?
  1.             502 senior human resource executives in Mid-Atlantic Region
  2.             Senior human resources executives in the Mid-Atlantic Region

                                                    iii.            The methods for finding the best candidates

  1.             Fifty-eight percent responding that referrals were one of the methods used
  1. All highway bridges in the U.S. are inspected periodically for structural deficiency by the Federal Highway Administration.  Data from the inspections are compiled into the National Bridge Inventory.  Several of the nearly 100 variables maintained are listed: (1)Whether the bridge has a structural deficiency (yes/no) (2) Width (3) Overall bridge rating (categories: Poor (scoring 1-3), Average (scoring 3-6), Excellent (scoring 4-10)) (4) Average number of days under construction per year.
  1. Variable (1) is:
  2.       Quantitative, discrete
  3.       Quantitative, continuous

                                                          iii.      Qualitative, nominal

  1.       Qualitative, ordinal
  1. Variable (2) is:
  2.       Quantitative, discrete
  3.       Quantitative, continuous

                                                          iii.      Qualitative, nominal

  1.       Qualitative, ordinal
  1. Variable (3) is:
  2.       Quantitative, discrete
  3.       Quantitative, continuous

                                                          iii.      Qualitative, nominal

  1.       Qualitative, ordinal
  1. Variable (4) is:
  2.       Quantitative, discrete
  3.       Quantitative, continuous

                                                          iii.      Qualitative, nominal

  1.       Qualitative, ordinal
  1. A researcher at a university in the U.S. collected estimates from 153 different studies about calorie consumption.  He conducted a meta-analysis using the estimates gathered from the studies.  What type of study is this?
  2. Observational Study
  3. Designed Experiment
  4. Secondary Source
  1. A study was conducted to determine the efficacy of a new tutoring method, method A.  Half of the participants were given tutoring method A, and the other half of the participants were given the standard tutoring method.  What type of study is this?
  2. Observational Study
  3. Designed Experiment
  4. Secondary Source
  1. A study of the spending habits of Americans was conducted.  Participants were selected and mailed a survey to complete and return to the researchers of the study.  What type of study is this?
  1. Observational Study
  2. Designed Experiment
  3. Secondary Source
  1. You are interested in finding the probability of at least 5 people showing up at a queue in an hour.  An average rate of people showing up at the queue is provided.  To find this probability, you should use:
  2. Binomial Distribution
  3. Poisson Distribution
  4. Bernoulli Distribution
  5. Normal Distribution
  1. You are interested in the probability of observing at least 8 heads when flipping a standard coin 10 times.  To find this probability, you should use:
  2. Binomial Distribution
  3. Poisson Distribution
  4. Bernoulli Distribution
  5. Normal Distribution
  1. Match the letter of the term below with the correct definition.
  2. Predictive Value Positive
  3. Predictive Value Negative
  4. False Negative
  5. False Positive
  6. Sensitivity
  7. Specificity
  8. Prevalence

_____________The rate at which a disease/characteristic is present in the population.

_____________The probability of a negative test result given that the disease is not present.

_____________The probability of a positive test result given that the disease is present.

_____________A test result indicating a positive status when the disease is not present.

_____________A test result indicating a negative status when the disease is present.

_____________The probability of a disease being present given that the test result was positive.

____________The probability of a disease not being present given that the test result was negative.

  1. A study of 5000 adults with known status for a type of cancer were screened using a newly developed cancer screening test.   A positive result indicates that the test determined that the person has this type of cancer.  Use the contingency table to answer the questions on the next page.

Cancer Status

Test Result

Cancer

No Cancer

Positive

852

348

Negative

23

3777

  1. If a random participant in this study is selected, what is the probability that he or she tests negative for Cancer?
  2. 0.23
  3. 0.49
  4. 0.76

            iii. 0.52

  1. If a random participant in this study is selected, what is the probability that her or she tests negative and does NOT have cancer?
  2.             0.7554
  3.             0.237

                                                          iii.            0.9659

  1.             0.3982
  1. Estimate the sensitivity of the test.
  2. 0.170
  3. 0.710

iii.    0.084

  1. 0.974
  1. Estimate the specificity of the test.
  2. 0.916
  3. 0.710

iii.   0.084

  1. 0.974
  1. The prevalence of a disease is known to be 0.2.  The sensitivity of a test for the disease is 0.85; the specificity is 0.98.
  1. Calculate the predictive value positive.
  1.       0.963
  2.        0.751

                                                          iii.       0.914

  1.       0.869
  2. Calculate the predictive value negative.
  3. 0.963
  4. 0.751

iii.   0.914

  1. 0.869

Section 2:  For this section, use the dataset called iris (available in base R – you do not need to install anything else).  You must use R to find the answers in this section.  Remember to insert code and any plots you are required to produce.

  1. Find the mean of the variable Petal.Length

Calculate the price of your order

Simple Order Process

Fill in the Order Form

Share all the assignment information. Including the instructions, provided reading materials, grading rubric, number of pages, the required formatting, deadline, and your academic level. Provide any information and announcements shared by the professor. Choose your preferred writer if you have one.

Get Your Order Assigned

Once we receive your order form, we will select the best writer from our pool of experts to fit your assignment.

Share More Data if Needed

You will receive a confirmation email when a writer has been assigned your task. The writer may contact you if they need any additional information or clarifications regarding your task

Let Our Essay Writer Do Their Job

Once you entrust us with your academic task, our skilled writers embark on creating your paper entirely from the ground up. Through rigorous research and unwavering commitment to your guidelines, our experts meticulously craft every aspect of your paper. Our process ensures that your essay is not only original but also aligned with your specific requirements, making certain that the final piece surpasses your expectations.

Quality Checks and Proofreading

Upon the completion of your paper, it undergoes a meticulous review by our dedicated Quality and Proofreading department. This crucial step ensures not only the originality of the content but also its alignment with the highest academic standards. Our seasoned experts conduct thorough checks, meticulously examining every facet of your paper, including grammar, structure, coherence, and proper citation. This comprehensive review process guarantees that the final product you receive not only meets our stringent quality benchmarks but also reflects your dedication to academic excellence.

Review and Download the Final Draft

If you find that any part of the paper does not meet the initial instructions, send it back to us with your feedback, and we will make the necessary adjustments.