Feminist Epistemology

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Feminist Epistemology, Contextualism, and Philosophical Skepticism. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. In favor of their argument that no human belief is justified, philosophical skeptics back up this argument even more by using the Brain-in-vats concept that presumes that the human mind sometimes tends to act as if the brain has been detached from the rest of the body and placed in a vat liquid. Consequently, they continue to argue that since there is no one who will provide evidence or prove that the human brain is not in a vat, this is also another evidence to show that virtually no human belief is justified. As such, Brister regards the philosophical skepticism idea as ludicrous, which can only be saved by the application of common sense.

Some of the controversial arguments that philosophical skeptics have presented, which have continued to storm the heads of other scholars, include the belief in the idea that there was another force behind the course of evolution other than what the general universe perceives as a single intelligent designer. They have therefore been able to have a great influence on the world especially in most school curricula that have been forced to adjust their teaching programs especially when it comes to biological evolution studies.

According to Barristers, the concept of feminist epidemiology is a form of epistemology that generally builds on ideas and information from a feminist perspective. Feminist epistemology aims at providing counterarguments for the skeptics’ general view of the human mind and life as a whole. Brister argues that skeptics have a tendency to base their epistemological arguments from an androcentric and individualistic perspective. As a matter of fact, most skeptics are alleged to have an inclination towards perceiving certain elite individuals as solitary objects or in isolation.

Therefore, this implies that if skeptics could approach epistemology from a different perspective other than perceiving individuals as solitary entities, as is the case with feminist epistemology, then the philosophical skepticism would be less controversial and somehow less strong. Although feminism epistemology seems to be counteractive to philosophical skepticism to some extent, it does not aggressively attempt to object or criticize skepticism since such a move to disprove skepticism would do more than good. The disapproval would serve to popularize the philosophy than expose its controversial parts.